Please fix your autoresponder so it doesn't respond to every message
from this group. I can only imagine you're responding to every
message from every group you're subscribed to.
At 05:25 PM 8/22/2009, you wrote:
pfTicket: 10099526
Dear Customer,
Thank you for your enquiry. This is an automa
pfTicket: 10099526
Dear Customer,
Thank you for your enquiry. This is an automatic reply to acknowledge receipt
of your recent e-mail.
We have received your email and tracking number is noted in this auto reply.
Our customer services team will respond to your enquiry. If you require an
immedi
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:50:17 +0200, Krist van Besien wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 4:19 AM, Mike -- EMAIL
> IGNORED wrote:
>
>> One additional but important point. When things slowed substantially
>> after adding SSL to part of my tree, everything slowed, even the parts
>> that were not doing
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 4:19 AM, Mike -- EMAIL
IGNORED wrote:
> One additional but important point. When things slowed substantially
> after adding SSL to part of my tree, everything slowed, even the parts
> that were not doing SSL at all. Again, the slowness was caused by the
> DNS, not the encr
On 07.08.09 15:27, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
> Please read my recent thread "excessive DNS slows httpd".
> The bottom line: I recently introduced SSL to part of my
> web site, and it slowed considerably. Using iptables
> (on a Linux system),I blocked all DNS, and speed of
> response is better t
On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 01:59:34 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:46:35 -0400, Josh Gooding wrote:
>
>> Mike,
>>
>> If it was up to me, I wouldn't use a Windows based server either,
>> however, what the client bought is what I had to use. KWIM? I can't
>> block DNS on th
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:46:35 -0400, Josh Gooding wrote:
> Mike,
>
> If it was up to me, I wouldn't use a Windows based server either,
> however, what the client bought is what I had to use. KWIM? I can't
> block DNS on this server due to it having a .com tied to it. I looked
> this afternoon and
Mike,
If it was up to me, I wouldn't use a Windows based server either, however,
what the client bought is what I had to use. KWIM?
I can't block DNS on this server due to it having a .com tied to it. I
looked this afternoon and no dice. I can look into it more in depth on the
httpd site. What
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:08:27 -0400, Josh Gooding wrote:
> No, my understanding is login's weren't encrypted unless SSL was used.
>
> Scott, I'm not a sysadmin, but does win2k3 server have something like
> iptables? That MIGHT be a little more helpful, I'll have to research it
> more, however, I
I had an idea... what about putting the domain in the configuration file and
doing a "hard" redirect upon proper authentication? Would this be
feasible? Doable in httpd?
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Josh Gooding wrote:
> No, my understanding is login's weren't encrypted unless SSL was used.
No, my understanding is login's weren't encrypted unless SSL was used.
Scott, I'm not a sysadmin, but does win2k3 server have something like
iptables? That MIGHT be a little more helpful, I'll have to research it
more, however, I still need to figure out how to drop SSL after the login
screen. L
On 08/07/2009 11:27 AM, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
Additionally, I thought sign-in is encrypted even when
SSL is not in use. Is this not true?
That is not true. Sign-in is not encrypted unless you use SSL.
--
Dan Poirier
---
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 08:40:55 -0400, Josh Gooding wrote:
> Thanks for the reply Krist,
>
> Let me give you a little background on what I did (and still doing). I
> created a video training software that is now internet based. Nothing
> inside of the training needs to be across HTTPS, except the
13 matches
Mail list logo
