Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with NAT, Public IP's and SSL cert

2007-11-02 Thread Krist van Besien
On Nov 2, 2007 11:33 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think that it is some limitation of Apache that it > > > cannot listen on virtual public IP, but only on IP's which host directly > > > uses. > > On 01.11.07 13:10, Krist van Besien wrote: > > This is not a limitatio

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with NAT, Public IP's and SSL cert

2007-11-02 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> On Nov 1, 2007 11:14 AM, Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have one main VIP 65.65.65.65 for vhosts which share that IP, and if > > customer needs(like in the case of ssl) he will get another IP e.g. > > 65.65.65.66. I always thought that for ssl is important public IP not > > private on host

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with NAT, Public IP's and SSL cert

2007-11-01 Thread Krist van Besien
On Nov 1, 2007 11:14 AM, Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have one main VIP 65.65.65.65 for vhosts which share that IP, and if > customer needs(like in the case of ssl) he will get another IP e.g. > 65.65.65.66. I always thought that for ssl is important public IP not > private on host. I think

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with NAT, Public IP's and SSL cert

2007-11-01 Thread Hans
Krist van Besien wrote: On Nov 1, 2007 10:36 AM, Krist van Besien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Nov 1, 2007 8:38 AM, Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So in your config you have only or . No. In your config you have: Several of either or (After "VirtualHost" you need to put ex

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with NAT, Public IP's and SSL cert

2007-11-01 Thread Krist van Besien
On Nov 1, 2007 10:36 AM, Krist van Besien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 1, 2007 8:38 AM, Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So in your config you have only or > > . > > No. In your config you have: > Several of either > > or > > (After "VirtualHost" you need to put exactly the same thin

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with NAT, Public IP's and SSL cert

2007-11-01 Thread Krist van Besien
On Nov 1, 2007 8:38 AM, Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So in your config you have only or > . No. In your config you have: Several of either or (After "VirtualHost" you need to put exactly the same thing you've put after your NameVirtualHost statement.) And you can have one blockt or one

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with NAT, Public IP's and SSL cert

2007-10-31 Thread Hans
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 10/27/07, Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In last week our customer requested to put new ssl cert for him with his own IP. I created VIP and forwarded to ports:80 and 443. But I have problem with configuration. Before few words about my future conf, during

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with NAT, Public IP's and SSL cert

2007-10-31 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> On 10/27/07, Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In last week our customer requested to put new ssl cert for him with his > > own IP. I created VIP and forwarded to ports:80 and 443. > > But I have problem with configuration. > > > > Before few words about my future conf, during next few weeks I

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with NAT, Public IP's and SSL cert

2007-10-29 Thread Krist van Besien
On 10/27/07, Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > I 've checked many websites and forums as well as books but I cannot > find solution for my problem. > I have one server behind NAT(pfsense firewall), until last week I was > using one IP for all virtual hosts. > My conf was: > Namevirtualhost *:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with NAT, Public IP's and SSL cert

2007-10-27 Thread Hans
Hi! I 've checked many websites and forums as well as books but I cannot find solution for my problem. I have one server behind NAT(pfsense firewall), until last week I was using one IP for all virtual hosts. My conf was: Namevirtualhost *:80 Namevirutalhost *:443 In last week our customer r