On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Karthick P
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It works as expected. An other query is that which option would be best to
> set this expiration, or .
I think that is explained pretty well here:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/sections.html#file-and-web
under "What t
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 9:22 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_expires in Apache 2.0.54
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Karthick P
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Karthick P
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hello everyone,
>
>
>
> We have been using Apache 2.0.54 on SLES as our hosting standard for all our
> applications. We have enabled the mod_expires in apache to set the
> expiration settings for the static content li
Hello everyone,
We have been using Apache 2.0.54 on SLES as our hosting standard for all our
applications. We have enabled the mod_expires in apache to set the
expiration settings for the static content like JPEG, GIF, JS, etc. There is
a requirement that the expiration settings should be set a
