AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error

2008-01-08 Thread BjoernArne.Ramann
13:29 À : users@httpd.apache.org Objet : [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error Hello together, i try to make apache 2.2.6 (i368) under 10.3. my configure: ./configure --disable-ldap When i start make, i get the following error (the same without --disable-ldap) file included from /root/src/httpd-2.2.6/include

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error

2008-01-08 Thread Axel-Stephane SMORGRAV
pache.org Objet : [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error Hello together, i try to make apache 2.2.6 (i368) under 10.3. my configure: ./configure --disable-ldap When i start make, i get the following error (the same without --disable-ldap) file included from /root/src/httpd-2.2.6/include

[EMAIL PROTECTED] make error

2008-01-08 Thread BjoernArne.Ramann
Hello together, i try to make apache 2.2.6 (i368) under 10.3. my configure: ./configure --disable-ldap When i start make, i get the following error (the same without --disable-ldap) file included from /root/src/httpd-2.2.6/include/util_ldap.h:31, from exports.c:38: /usr/i

[EMAIL PROTECTED] make error code 2

2007-07-19 Thread Steve Cimbalo
Trying to run "make" command with AIX 5.2 and Apache 1.3.37 Environment is set as follows: _=/usr/bin/env LANG=en_US LOGIN=d47cs PATH=.:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/vacpp/bin:/usr/bin:/etc:/usr/sbin:/usr/ucb:/usr/bin/X11:/sbin:/usr/java131/jre/bin:/usr/java131/bin:/home/d47cs/apache_1.3.37:/home/d47cs/apa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error (embryo state user)

2007-01-29 Thread herauthon
problem solved - or no errors did /configure without --enable-so ?? - Original Message - From: "herauthon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 8:42 PM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error (embryo state user) > Before i send a load of snipp

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error (embryo state user)

2007-01-29 Thread herauthon
From: "Sander Temme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 7:57 PM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error (embryo state user) > > On Jan 29, 2007, at 10:12 AM, herauthon wrote: > > >> - On what OS you are trying to compile. > > ** Net

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error (embryo state user)

2007-01-29 Thread Sander Temme
On Jan 29, 2007, at 10:12 AM, herauthon wrote: - On what OS you are trying to compile. ** NetBSD 3.1 i386 on P-II MMX 333 Unfortunately, I haven ever had the chance to try compiling Apache on netbsd. - What options you gave the "configure" command. ** --enable-so When you run ./confi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error (embryo state user)

2007-01-29 Thread herauthon
- Original Message - From: "Krist van Besien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 5:57 PM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error (embryo state user) > On 1/29/07, herauthon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This happens for me a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error (embryo state user)

2007-01-29 Thread Sander Temme
On Jan 29, 2007, at 7:45 AM, herauthon wrote: include/apr_portable.h:46:23: #if with no expression Looks like APR_HAVE_PTHREAD_H is not set, and it's all pear-shaped from there. This should not happen as it is defined in include/ apr.h, which is generated from include/apr.h.in by ./config

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error (embryo state user)

2007-01-29 Thread Krist van Besien
On 1/29/07, herauthon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This happens for me after make Please tell us: - Which version of apache you are trying to compile. - On what OS you are trying to compile. - What compiler you are using. - What options you gave the "configure" command. that would be a start...

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error (embryo state user)

2007-01-29 Thread herauthon
This happens for me after make ___ include/apr_portable.h:46:23: #if with no expression include/apr_portable.h:151:43: operator '&&' has no right operand In file included from strings/apr_snprintf.c:23: include/apr_portable.h:285: error: parse error before '*' token incl

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error --with-dbm=gdbm, version 2.0.59

2006-12-15 Thread K. Clair
On 12/14/06, K. Clair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/14/06, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:04:01AM -0600, K. Clair wrote: > > I don't think it has anything to do with the installed libraries: > > httpd-2.0.55 with the same configure options compiles with no er

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error --with-dbm=gdbm, version 2.0.59

2006-12-14 Thread K. Clair
On 12/14/06, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:04:01AM -0600, K. Clair wrote: > I don't think it has anything to do with the installed libraries: > httpd-2.0.55 with the same configure options compiles with no errors > on the same machine. > > I also tried to compile

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error --with-dbm=gdbm, version 2.0.59

2006-12-14 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:04:01AM -0600, K. Clair wrote: > I don't think it has anything to do with the installed libraries: > httpd-2.0.55 with the same configure options compiles with no errors > on the same machine. > > I also tried to compile httpd-2.0.57, and I got the same make error as > w

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error --with-dbm=gdbm, version 2.0.59

2006-12-14 Thread K. Clair
I don't think it has anything to do with the installed libraries: httpd-2.0.55 with the same configure options compiles with no errors on the same machine. I also tried to compile httpd-2.0.57, and I got the same make error as with 2.0.59. Again, all of this was done on the same system. Has any

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error --with-dbm=gdbm, version 2.0.59

2006-12-13 Thread Yvo van Doorn
What version of gdbm is installed? Was it perhaps removed in a clean up of the machine? I know under Debian deborphan always wants to remove libgdbm-dev On 12/12/06, K. Clair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'm trying to upgrade apache from 2.0.55 to 2.0.59. We have a standard configure line t

[EMAIL PROTECTED] make error --with-dbm=gdbm, version 2.0.59

2006-12-12 Thread K. Clair
Hi, I'm trying to upgrade apache from 2.0.55 to 2.0.59. We have a standard configure line that we have been using for the entire 2.0.x release of apache: ./configure --enable-maintainer-mode --enable-proxy --disable-proxy-connect --disable-proxy-ftp --enable-mods-shared=all --with-dbm=gdbm --wi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error with apache 2.2.3 --with-ssl

2006-09-29 Thread cristopher pierson ewing
Sander, I just managed to get the whole thing to make and make install without error. What changed? I used fink to install the latest package available for openssl on Mac that it had available, the one you cite below, 0.9.7i. The one that was on this box originally was 0.9.6m. The one I ins

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error with apache 2.2.3 --with-ssl

2006-09-29 Thread Sander Temme
On Sep 29, 2006, at 2:24 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Well it seems autoconf is borked on your box, because it should be test compiling to determine if X509_STORE_CTX_set_depth is exported from OpenSSL. Apparently not, on your build, but autoconf decides it is successful. Note that the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error with apache 2.2.3 --with-ssl

2006-09-29 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Well it seems autoconf is borked on your box, because it should be test compiling to determine if X509_STORE_CTX_set_depth is exported from OpenSSL. Apparently not, on your build, but autoconf decides it is successful. You can try forcing the ac_cv_ flag for HAVE_X509_STORE_CTX_SET_DEPTH, I don't

[EMAIL PROTECTED] make error with apache 2.2.3 --with-ssl

2006-09-29 Thread cristopher pierson ewing
Howdy, trying to build apache 2.2.3 on a Mac G4 (old, and slow) with OS X 10.4. I'm trying to build with mod_ssl and a number of other modules, and ran into the following error: /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols: _X509_STORE_CTX_set_depth collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [httpd]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error while installing apache 2.0.55 on Solaris 2.8 sparc

2006-05-09 Thread Jon Snow
Krishna, Use GNU make. Set your path so the GNU make is before the solaris make. Having said that the much better option would be to download gcc from www.sunfreeware.com and the latest source from apache.org and compile with your specific options in configure. Of course use GNU make for this a

[EMAIL PROTECTED] make error while installing apache 2.0.55 on Solaris 2.8 sparc

2006-05-08 Thread Krishna Mondal
Hi,   I am trying to install apache2.0.55 on Solaris8 sparc machine. These are the steps i followed. 1. FTPed the httpd-2.0.55-sparc-sun-solaris2.8.tar.gz at /export/home/netiq/apache55inst2. >cd /export/home/netiq/apache55inst>gunzip httpd-2.0.55-sparc-sun-solaris2.8.tar.gz . (Got the httpd-2.0.5

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error

2006-02-02 Thread Jonathan Mangin
> I did find that RM and AWK needed their definitions added > in httpd-2.0.55/build/config_vars.mk. I'm using gawk-3.1.4 > and getting: > > awk -f > /export/home/jman/download/src/apache/httpd-2.0.55/srclib/apr/build/make_var > _export.awk > /export/home/jman/download/src/apache/httpd-2.0.55/srcli

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error

2006-02-01 Thread Jonathan Mangin
> I've upgraded gcc to 3.3.2 on Solaris 8x86, and most > other build tools.(?) I'm now getting: > I did find that RM and AWK needed their definitions added in httpd-2.0.55/build/config_vars.mk. I'm using gawk-3.1.4 and getting: awk -f /export/home/jman/download/src/apache/httpd-2.0.55/srclib/

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error

2006-02-01 Thread Jonathan Mangin
I've upgraded gcc to 3.3.2 on Solaris 8x86, and most other build tools.(?) I'm now getting: Undefined first referenced symbol in file ap_mpm_run server/.libs/libmain.a(main.o) ap_send_error_response server/.l

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error

2006-02-01 Thread Dave Floyd
Hi Jon, I suspect the base cause of your problems is the gcc version. when I last installed apache on solaris8 x86, I used gcc 3.4.2 and had no problems. 2.9.5 is very old. rgds I'm now trying to install 2.0.55 and receiving the error below. I'm not using the ksh. Found newer headers. Wi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error

2006-01-31 Thread Joshua Slive
On 1/31/06, Jonathan Mangin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are these kinds of problems too vague or is > there a better place to ask? You need to wait a little more than 5 hours before starting to complain about a lack of response. It looks to me like you have poorly-installed build tools (a common

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error

2006-01-31 Thread Jonathan Mangin
Are these kinds of problems too vague or is there a better place to ask? - Original Message - From: "Jonathan Mangin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 10:31 AM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error > > I've worked around th

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error

2006-01-31 Thread Jonathan Mangin
Tuesday, January 31, 2006 9:38 AM Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error > I'm now trying to install 2.0.55 and receiving the > error below. I'm not using the ksh. > > Found newer headers. Will rebuild apr.exp. > -f apr.exp exports.c export_vars.h > /bin/ksh: -f: n

[EMAIL PROTECTED] make error

2006-01-31 Thread Jonathan Mangin
I'm now trying to install 2.0.55 and receiving the error below. I'm not using the ksh. Found newer headers. Will rebuild apr.exp. -f apr.exp exports.c export_vars.h /bin/ksh: -f: not found make[3]: *** [delete-exports] Error 127 make[3]: Leaving directory `/export/home/jman/download/src/apache/ht