On 9/11/08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/10/08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 09.09.08 21:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > 5000 reqs/sec @ 20 KB/req = 100 MB/sec = 1Gbps. One gigabit network1
> > > it's even 800, not 1000 Mbits pe
> On 9/10/08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 09.09.08 21:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > 5000 reqs/sec @ 20 KB/req = 100 MB/sec = 1Gbaud. One gigabit network1
> >
> > please don't mess bauds and bits per second. it's something very different.
> > http://en.wikipedia
On 9/10/08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 09.09.08 21:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > 5000 reqs/sec @ 20 KB/req = 100 MB/sec = 1Gbaud. One gigabit network1
>
> please don't mess bauds and bits per second. it's something very different.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ba
On 09.09.08 21:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 5000 reqs/sec @ 20 KB/req = 100 MB/sec = 1Gbaud. One gigabit network1
please don't mess bauds and bits per second. it's something very different.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baud
it's even 800, not 1000 Mbits per second...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hardware for proxy
I plan to implement a proxy server for apache. The idea is to act like
a
firewall, proxy , load balancer and cache. It must serve around 2000
sites. The backend servers I don't know for now how many will be, but I
am prepare to start with 2 or 3 and in case of
d.apache.org
>>> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] hardware for proxy
>>> I plan to implement a proxy server for apache. The idea is to act like
>>> a
>>> firewall, proxy , load balancer and cache. It must serve around 2000
>>> sites. The backend servers I don&#x
Ben Spencer wrote:
Ther is no SSL involve what so ever.
The sites are very active (it is a share hosting environment and this
is
the reason why I wanna try the proxy) and beside that we plan to
expand.
We have between 50~300 reqs/sec (depend on time of the day) with around
10~20 kb/reqs and this
> Ther is no SSL involve what so ever.
> The sites are very active (it is a share hosting environment and this
> is
> the reason why I wanna try the proxy) and beside that we plan to
> expand.
> We have between 50~300 reqs/sec (depend on time of the day) with around
> 10~20 kb/reqs and this is not
riginal Message-
From: Alexandru David Constantinescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 3:20 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] hardware for proxy
Hello to all
I plan to implement a proxy server for apache. The idea is to act like
a
firewall, proxy
> From: Alexandru David Constantinescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 3:20 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] hardware for proxy
>
> Hello to all
>
> I plan to implement a proxy server for apache. The idea is to act
Evert Lammerts wrote:
Why would you start out with implementing a single point of failure?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Alexandru David Constantinescu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello to all
I plan to implement a proxy server for apache. The idea is to act like a
firewall, proxy , load bal
Why would you start out with implementing a single point of failure?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Alexandru David Constantinescu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello to all
>
> I plan to implement a proxy server for apache. The idea is to act like a
> firewall, proxy , load balancer and cache. I
Hello to all
I plan to implement a proxy server for apache. The idea is to act like a
firewall, proxy , load balancer and cache. It must serve around 2000
sites. The backend servers I don't know for now how many will be, but I
am prepare to start with 2 or 3 and in case of heavy load , increase
13 matches
Mail list logo
