Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl

2007-12-11 Thread Hiep Nguyen
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Vincent Bray wrote: On 11/12/2007, Hiep Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: should i change to apache user or something else? i'll have couple people in this office upload files (.pdf, .php, .js, .doc, .xls, etc...) to /var/www/html/ folder and i don't want to give root pass

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl

2007-12-11 Thread Vincent Bray
On 11/12/2007, Hiep Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > should i change to apache user or something else? i'll have couple people > in this office upload files (.pdf, .php, .js, .doc, .xls, etc...) to > /var/www/html/ folder and i don't want to give root password to them. Don't use the apache use

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl

2007-12-11 Thread Hiep Nguyen
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Vincent Bray wrote: On 11/12/2007, Hiep Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: thanks. couple more questions: how do i install/enable mod_status so i can use apachectl status? I don't remember exactly. There's either going to be a specific config file for it in /etc/httpd/co

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl

2007-12-11 Thread Vincent Bray
On 11/12/2007, Hiep Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > thanks. couple more questions: > > how do i install/enable mod_status so i can use apachectl status? I don't remember exactly. There's either going to be a specific config file for it in /etc/httpd/conf.d or else you should search /etc/httpd

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl

2007-12-11 Thread Hiep Nguyen
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Vincent Bray wrote: On 11/12/2007, Vincent Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/12/2007, Hiep Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: yum install links, but only elinks package return. elinks should do fine. I should also mention that this status option relies on mod_status

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl

2007-12-11 Thread Vincent Bray
On 11/12/2007, Vincent Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/12/2007, Hiep Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > yum install links, but only elinks package return. > > elinks should do fine. I should also mention that this status option relies on mod_status being configured at the usual /server-

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl

2007-12-11 Thread Vincent Bray
On 11/12/2007, Hiep Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yum install links, but only elinks package return. elinks should do fine. -- noodl - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl

2007-12-11 Thread Hiep Nguyen
hi list i do a minimal install centos 5, then install apache using yum and apachectl start and the test page worked. now i try apachectl status and i got: The 'links' package is required for this functionality. how do i install this package? i tried: yum install links, but only elinks package

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl startssl returns "assertion 'rv == APR_SUCCESS" failed'

2007-12-04 Thread Axel-Stephane SMORGRAV
se one is configured for DNS resolution, and the other not. This is a known bug in Apache 2.0.x. I believe it was solved in Apache 2.2.x -ascs -Message d'origine- De : mikeporter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mercredi 5 décembre 2007 05:30 À : users@httpd.apache.org Objet : Re: [

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl startssl returns "assertion 'rv == APR_SUCCESS" failed'

2007-12-04 Thread mikeporter
I think this is caused by Apache trying to bind to an IP that does not have a PTR record or other way to turn the IP into a name. I ran into this a bit ago when booting a server that has an interal IP used to communicate with its platform controller. This IP did not have a name. I temporarily

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl startssl returns "assertion 'rv == APR_SUCCESS" failed'

2007-03-29 Thread Mark Drummond
he.org Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 1:08:22 AM Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl startssl returns "assertion 'rv == APR_SUCCESS" failed' Hello everyone, This is probably better directed to the mod_ssl folks but their majordomo is using SORBS and SORBS is blocking Yahoo mail a

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl startssl returns "assertion 'rv == APR_SUCCESS" failed'

2007-03-29 Thread Mark Drummond
Hello everyone, This is probably better directed to the mod_ssl folks but their majordomo is using SORBS and SORBS is blocking Yahoo mail accounts. I have Apache 2.0.59 binaries (and required supporting components) from sunfreeware installed on two Solaris 9 9/04 servers. The two systems ar

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl starssl failed

2007-02-07 Thread m-kuriyama
Hi all, I configured Apache/2.0.53 with SSL on Solaris9 platform. After I generated server secret key and certification by openssl 0.9.7e and modified ssl.conf to use above, #apachectl startssl was executed, I encoutered the following message. -

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl and multiple daemons

2006-02-22 Thread Richard de Vries
Thanks to everyone who responded to my inquiry. I indeed wanted process isolation. The server I am currently building out needs to support several development groups; all which require their own webserver instance. Initially I was wanting to go with IP based virtual hosting, but this would not all

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl and multiple daemons

2006-02-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Nick Kew wrote: On Wednesday 22 February 2006 21:23, Richard de Vries wrote: I have the need to run multiple daemons off of the same apache base install. Erm, why? Why not? Each daemon will have it's own configuration file of course, but since they are all configured pretty much the same

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl and multiple daemons

2006-02-22 Thread Oliver.Schaudt
Hi Richard, >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Richard de Vries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Gesendet: Mi 22.02.2006 22:23 >An: users@httpd.apache.org >Betreff: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl and multiple daemons >I have the need to run multiple daemons off of the >sam

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl and multiple daemons

2006-02-22 Thread Nick Kew
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 21:23, Richard de Vries wrote: > I have the need to run multiple daemons off of the > same apache base install. Erm, why? > Each daemon will have it's > own configuration file of course, but since they are > all configured pretty much the same (same modules etc) > I

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl and multiple daemons

2006-02-22 Thread httpd2
they are not. On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Joshua Slive wrote: > To: users@httpd.apache.org > From: Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl and multiple daemons > > On 2/22/06, Richard de Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl and multiple daemons

2006-02-22 Thread Joshua Slive
On 2/22/06, Richard de Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have the need to run multiple daemons off of the > same apache base install. Each daemon will have it's > own configuration file of course, but since they are > all configured pretty much the same (same modules etc) > I don't see a need to

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl and multiple daemons

2006-02-22 Thread Jerold McAllister
I have the need to run multiple daemons off of the same apache base install. Each daemon will have it's own configuration file of course, but since they are all configured pretty much the same (same modules etc) I don't see a need to have several apache installs. So, I'd have one install, i.e

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl and multiple daemons

2006-02-22 Thread Richard de Vries
I have the need to run multiple daemons off of the same apache base install. Each daemon will have it's own configuration file of course, but since they are all configured pretty much the same (same modules etc) I don't see a need to have several apache installs. So, I'd have one install, i.e.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl trivia question

2005-11-06 Thread alfredo
Ashley Gould wrote: If I make changes to httpd.conf to activate an unused module, would the new module be available by running apachclt graceful, or do I need to do a full stop start? apachectl gracefulGracefully restarts the Apache daemon by sending it a SIGUSR1. If

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl trivia question

2005-11-04 Thread Aman Raheja
That should do it http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/stopping.html#graceful Aman Raheja http://www.techquotes.com On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 15:05:02 -0800, Ashley Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > If I make changes to httpd.conf to activate an unused module, would the > new module be available by runn

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl trivia question

2005-11-04 Thread Ashley Gould
If I make changes to httpd.conf to activate an unused module, would the new module be available by running apachclt graceful, or do I need to do a full stop start? -- -ashley Did you try poking at it with a stick? - The o

[EMAIL PROTECTED] PROBLEM RESOLVED: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl startssl --need to start without entering password

2005-08-15 Thread James, Denise
e.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl startssl --need to start without entering password -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, James, Denise wrote: > Please point me to where I can find documentation on starting apache > with ssl and NOT having to enter t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl startssl --need to start without entering password

2005-08-15 Thread Mark H. Wood
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, James, Denise wrote: > Please point me to where I can find documentation on starting apache > with ssl and NOT having to enter the password. I am new to managing > this web server and was recently asked to setup a new certificate

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apachectl startssl --need to start without entering password

2005-08-14 Thread James, Denise
    Hello,   Please point me to where I can find documentation on starting apache with ssl and NOT having to enter the password.  I am new to managing this web server and was recently asked to setup a new certificate which expired.   I did that, but now whenever apache is restarted, o