Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2.3 and load balancing

2008-06-01 Thread Eric Bowman
Sander Temme wrote: On Jun 1, 2008, at 1:05 AM, Eric Bowman wrote: I'm in a situation (RHEL 5.1) where the only "supported" version of Apache is 2.2.3. We are wishing to avail of the session affinity load balancing features in mod_proxy_balancer, and I'm wondering what the general consensus

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2.3 and load balancing

2008-06-01 Thread Sander Temme
On Jun 1, 2008, at 1:05 AM, Eric Bowman wrote: I'm in a situation (RHEL 5.1) where the only "supported" version of Apache is 2.2.3. We are wishing to avail of the session affinity load balancing features in mod_proxy_balancer, and I'm wondering what the general consensus is on how suitabl

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2.3 and load balancing

2008-06-01 Thread Travis Sidelinger
We have been running 2.2.6 in a production environment doing session balancing. It has been working great. Eric Bowman wrote: Hi, I'm in a situation (RHEL 5.1) where the only "supported" version of Apache is 2.2.3. We are wishing to avail of the session affinity load balancing features in

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2.3 and load balancing

2008-06-01 Thread Eric Bowman
Hi, I'm in a situation (RHEL 5.1) where the only "supported" version of Apache is 2.2.3. We are wishing to avail of the session affinity load balancing features in mod_proxy_balancer, and I'm wondering what the general consensus is on how suitable that version is regarding that feature. Can