Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Win32DisableAcceptEx

2005-09-02 Thread Grønn Demon
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Double check - FYI the AV products which do inject a filter into the socket stack don't automagically 'remove' themselves when they are turned off... they just don't do scanning. Well... I right-clicked the system-tray icon and selected "exit control program", which

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Win32DisableAcceptEx

2005-09-02 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Grønn Demon wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: I don't think there is any network protection... I use http://www.free-av.com. Turning it off completely didn't help either. Double check - FYI the AV products which do inject a filter into the socket stack don't automagically 'remove' themselves

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Win32DisableAcceptEx

2005-09-02 Thread Grønn Demon
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: And although you don't mention it, XP SP2 borked the localhost provider AGAIN. FYI - only 127.0.0.1 on XP SP2 works, although on every modern OS you can use any 127.n.n.n address to perform a local loopback. I've heard about that, but both OpenSSH and Apache are bou

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Win32DisableAcceptEx

2005-09-01 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Grønn Demon wrote: Hello, I have both OpenSSH (using the Cygwin port from sshwindows.sf.net) and Apache 2.0.52 installed on my Windows XP SP2 system and don't use them very frequently (I guess a new Apache version's already been released). That's ok - .54 hasn't changed much in this respect

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Win32DisableAcceptEx

2005-09-01 Thread Grønn Demon
Hello, I have both OpenSSH (using the Cygwin port from sshwindows.sf.net) and Apache 2.0.52 installed on my Windows XP SP2 system and don't use them very frequently (I guess a new Apache version's already been released). Anyway, after some time I wanted to login to my box using SSH again, but