ers though. (thats why we use webhop)maybe we should petition dyndns
to
>>> allow the domains they hand out to be linked to an IPADDRESS:PORT
instead
>>> of
>>> just an IP. That would elminate any workarounds like webhop and suffice
>>> to
>>> say solv
s though. (thats why we use webhop)maybe we should petition dyndns to
>>> allow the domains they hand out to be linked to an IPADDRESS:PORT instead
>>> of
>>> just an IP. That would elminate any workarounds like webhop and suffice
>>> to
>>> say solve the port 80 issue w
even with a business account blocks port 80.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Brian Mearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 3:40 AM
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Running Multiple Windows Services on port 8080
>
>
&g
William,
I installed three separate Windows services, with each using its own config
file, doc root and logfiles. Within each config file I specified one of
three IP addresses at port 8080 and specified the Virtual Host, doc root,
logfiles, etc. I tested it out and when I started one of the ser
jwberger wrote:
> I did that but it still seemed like if I had only one windows service it
> started all three sites no matter what. I install a new service that used
> one of the ip:8080 for its listening address. It used a different logfile,
> error file and document root. However, when I star
Okay, I figured out what I was doing wrong. For the Listen Address, I only
had the port number. Therefore, when I started the service it would
listening on port 8080 at any IP address the server had bound to it. "Stupid
Me" When I changed it to be IP:port only the website that was configured in
I did that but it still seemed like if I had only one windows service it
started all three sites no matter what. I install a new service that used
one of the ip:8080 for its listening address. It used a different logfile,
error file and document root. However, when I started the service I could
riginal Message - From: "Brian Mearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Running Multiple Windows Services on port 8080
How are you "redirecting" to the IP address? I used to use dyndns.com
for my subdomai
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Running Multiple Windows Services on port 8080
>
>
>> How are you "redirecting" to the IP address? I used to use dyndns.com
>> for my subdomain na
suffice to
say solve the port 80 issue with ISP's.
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Mearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Running Multiple Windows Services on port 8080
How are you "redirec
enjoy it while you can.
Jay
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Mearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Running Multiple Windows Services on port 8080
Some ISPs don't block port 80 for residential
How are you "redirecting" to the IP address? I used to use dyndns.com
for my subdomain name, and I was able to append the port number with
no problem. E.g., my subdomain was something like bmearns.homeip.net,
so I just went to http://bmearns.homeip.net:8080.
Do you not want users to see your IP ad
r it to work. Now
>> users see the ip address in the browser address bar. not good. not good at
>> all.
>>
>> Apache 2.2.9
>> Linksys Gateway/Router WCG200
>>
>> Jay
>>
>> ----- Original Message - From: "jwberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
Linksys Gateway/Router WCG200
Jay
- Original Message - From: "jwberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Running Multiple Windows Services on port 8080
They are bound to one interface. I did see all
good at
all.
Apache 2.2.9
Linksys Gateway/Router WCG200
Jay
- Original Message -
From: "jwberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Running Multiple Windows Services on port 8080
They are bound to one i
Well look at that. Thanks for correcting me, even if you did it rather
unpleasantly. It's always nice to learn something new. That's why I
try to preface my comments with soft phrases like "to the best of my
knowledge".
-Brian
>
> You seem to be getting quite a bit of incorrect advise, so I'll hi
jwberger wrote:
> I am novice when it comes to Apache. I have installed 2.2.9 on a Windows
> 2003 server and can get it to run fine. The server has one NIC with three
> IP addresses bound to it. In installed Apache as a Windows service and
> edited the httpd.conf file so that the server listened
We may be able to get by with the short time Apache restarts, but I wanted to
exhuast all options before going down a certain path.
Thanks for all the help.
John
Brian Mearns-2 wrote:
>
> I see your issue. To the best of my knowledge, it just isn't possible.
> Like I said, a port maps a conne
I see your issue. To the best of my knowledge, it just isn't possible.
Like I said, a port maps a connection on an interface to a process:
the OS has no way of knowing how to pick a process other than that.
The only possible workaround I can think of would be a bit of a
doozie: you could write your
They are bound to one interface. I did see all the info on the Virtual host
and got it working. My issue is that since they are different sites, if I
do maintenance on one site and have to stop the service then all sites are
down and I cannot have that. This is why I was trying to setup differen
You /can/ run multiple sites from different IP addresses on the same
or different ports, using virtual hosts, which are well documented in
apache. It basically just allows you to use custom configurations
depending on which IP address is accessed. So for instance, you could
have a different Documen
I am novice when it comes to Apache. I have installed 2.2.9 on a Windows
2003 server and can get it to run fine. The server has one NIC with three
IP addresses bound to it. In installed Apache as a Windows service and
edited the httpd.conf file so that the server listened on port 8080. I
would
22 matches
Mail list logo
