Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirecting /foo//bar to /foo/bar without creating a loop

Krist van Besien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/14/06, Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Using *? results in a server error and I have no better idea how > > to make * ungreedy. > > > > Now I use: > > > > RewriteRule ^([^/]*)/{2,}(.*$) http://www.fabiankeil.de/$1/$2 > > [R=Permanent,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirecting /foo//bar to /foo/bar without creating a loop

Krist van Besien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/12/06, Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like to redirect /foo//bar (and /foo///bar etc.) > > to /foo/bar. So far I failed and I'm not sure if I did something > > wrong or if it's impossible with the Redirect directive. > > > > At

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirecting /foo//bar to /foo/bar without creating a loop

On 2/12/06, Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to redirect /foo//bar (and /foo///bar etc.) > to /foo/bar. So far I failed and I'm not sure if I did something > wrong or if it's impossible with the Redirect directive. > > At the moment my Apache server answers /foo//bar with 200 a

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirecting /foo//bar to /foo/bar without creating a loop

I would like to redirect /foo//bar (and /foo///bar etc.) to /foo/bar. So far I failed and I'm not sure if I did something wrong or if it's impossible with the Redirect directive. At the moment my Apache server answers /foo//bar with 200 and sends the document /foo/bar without letting the user know