--provides openssl-0.9.8a-11.18 | grep libssl
> > Than you shoudl know where it is.
> >
> > bye
> >
> > Oliver
> >
> >
> >
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: JM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
HI Jerome, Do Step by Step. 1:-We need the following software: openssl, apache (1.3.x), mod_ssl We will install the software from the /tmp directory. cd /tmpwget http://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-0.9.7c.tar.gzwget http://www.apache.de/dist/httpd/apache_1.3.29.tar.gzwget ht
.18")
> > make
> > rpm -q -l --provides openssl-0.9.8a-11.18 | grep libssl
> > Than you shoudl know where it is.
> >
> > bye
> >
> > Oliver
> >
> >
> >
> > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> > Von: JM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Gesende
a-11.18")> make> rpm -q -l --provides openssl-0.9.8a-11.18 | grep libssl> Than you shoudl know where it is.>> bye>> Oliver>>>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-> Von: JM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gesendet: Do 23.02.2006 13:20> An: users@httpd.apache.or
PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Fr 24.02.2006 09:24
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Cc: Schaudt, Oliver
Betreff: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Apache1.3.33 with mod_ssl compilation error
Hi,
rpm -q -l --provides openssl-0.9.7a-20.2 | grep libssl
libssl.so.4
/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7a
# SSL_BASE=/lib/
[EMAIL PROTECTED
now where it is.
>
> bye
>
> Oliver
>
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: JM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Do 23.02.2006 13:20
> An: users@httpd.apache.org
> Cc: Joost de Heer; ziwei ds
> Betreff: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Apache1.3.33 with
On Thursday 23 February 2006 14:46, Ricardo Stella wrote:
> Nick Kew wrote:
> > Is there a good reason for installing a server version that's been
> > obsolete for four years? Especially given the complexity of adding SSL
> > to it.
>
> Sometimes, yes
Indeed. But commonly people have very ba
Nick Kew wrote:
> Is there a good reason for installing a server version that's been obsolete
> for four years? Especially given the complexity of adding SSL to it.
>
>
Sometimes, yes
I have development work with proprietary modules that don't run on
2.x... So I'm forced to keep an inst
Nick Kew a écrit :
Is there a good reason for installing a server version that's been obsolete
for four years? Especially given the complexity of adding SSL to it.
Except the fact that he could as well install apache 1.34, there are a
lot of reasons to install apache 1.3x instead of apache 2.x
Is there a good reason for installing a server version that's been obsolete
for four years? Especially given the complexity of adding SSL to it.
--
Nick Kew
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server P
TECTED]
Gesendet: Do 23.02.2006 13:20
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Cc: Joost de Heer; ziwei ds
Betreff: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Apache1.3.33 with mod_ssl compilation error
Hi,
what application provides ssl library?
in my system openssl and the dev was is currently installed via RPM.
> -Original Message-
> From: JM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2006 13:20
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Cc: Joost de Heer; ziwei ds
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Apache1.3.33 with mod_ssl
> compilation error
>
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
what application provides ssl library?
in my system openssl and the dev was is currently installed via RPM.
Ive tried setting SSL_BASE to /usr/lib but with no luck.. Error: Cannot
find
SSL binaries under /usr/lib
tia,
On Friday 08 July 2005 12:34 am, Joost de He
> Error: Cannot find SSL binaries under /usr/local/ssl
Apparently you don't have the SSL libraries in /usr/local/ssl/lib.
Joost
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apach
14 matches
Mail list logo
