ECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 8:07 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with Apache 2.2.0 as a conventional
proxy
On Wed 26 Apr 2006 at 12:41PM, Axel-St?phane SMORGRAV wrote:
> I had a similar problem when using both mod_mem_cache and mod_disk ca
On Wed 26 Apr 2006 at 12:41PM, Axel-St?phane SMORGRAV wrote:
> I had a similar problem when using both mod_mem_cache and mod_disk cache with
> Apache 2.0.54. I ended up abandoning mod_mem_cache and never experienced the
> problem again. I may even have posted a bug report... but back then mod_ca
it, busy
developing mod_cache for Apache 2.1/2.2.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Dan Price [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 7:28 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with Apache 2.2.0 as a conventional
proxy
So, I've gott
So, I've gotten no responses (except to ask about Squid) to this query
which I posted on Monday. Can someone please point me in the right
direction? Should I start filing bugs? Contact a different list?
-dp
On Mon 17 Apr 2006 at 04:45PM, Dan Price wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> After years of f
ut mod_cache.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Dan Price [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 1:46 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with Apache 2.2.0 as a conventional proxy
Hi,
After years of frustration with Squid, I'm now using
Hi,
After years of frustration with Squid, I'm now using 32-bit Apache 2.2.0 as a
caching web proxy for my group. The underlying OS is 64-bit Solaris 10 running
on Opteron.
My initial configuration attempt was
$ ./configure --enable-proxy --enable-proxy-connect --enable-proxy-ftp \
--enabl
