On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:20:12AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Joseph S D Yao wrote:
> >>> I understand that the argument to the Proxy directive is supposed to be
> >>> a shell-style wildcard (rather than a simple prefix match), as the
> >>> argument to the ProxyMatch directive is supposed
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
I understand that the argument to the Proxy directive is supposed to be
a shell-style wildcard (rather than a simple prefix match), as the
argument to the ProxyMatch directive is supposed to be a Perl-style
regular expression.
Ok. So a shell style wildcard never hits on a
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:40:13AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Joseph S D Yao wrote:
> >
> > I have just joined this mailing list, but a Google indicates that this
> > topic has not come up before. If I am wrong, I apologize, and ask for a
> > pointer.
>
> Good way to attract attention
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
I have just joined this mailing list, but a Google indicates that this
topic has not come up before. If I am wrong, I apologize, and ask for a
pointer.
Good way to attract attention of lurkers :)
I understand that the argument to the Proxy directive is supposed to be
a
Apache httpd users mailing list,
I have just joined this mailing list, but a Google indicates that this
topic has not come up before. If I am wrong, I apologize, and ask for a
pointer.
I understand that the argument to the Proxy directive is supposed to be
a shell-style wildcard (rather than a s
