Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Only require satisfaction of one AuthType in 2.2

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Sorry - too many JJ's posting, had this confused. > >> On Mon, September 24, 2007 8:44 pm, Joel Johnson wrote: >>> The problem I'm running into is in designating the authentication as >>> *optional*. For example, I'd like to setup a wiki at wiki.and have the >>> conte

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Only require satisfaction of one AuthType in 2.2

Sorry - too many JJ's posting, had this confused. Joel Johnson wrote: > Does anyone have any thoughts, suggestions, pointers, tips or references on > this issue? > > On Mon, September 24, 2007 8:44 pm, Joel Johnson wrote: >> >> The problem I'm running into is in designating the authentication as

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Only require satisfaction of one AuthType in 2.2

Joel Johnson wrote: > Does anyone have any thoughts, suggestions, pointers, tips or references on > this issue? Not within 24 minutes. Nope. Bill - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Only require satisfaction of one AuthType in 2.2

Does anyone have any thoughts, suggestions, pointers, tips or references on this issue? Thanks! On Mon, September 24, 2007 8:44 pm, Joel Johnson wrote: > I'm setting up a site using Apache httpd 2.2 and an existing Kerberos > infrastructure and would like to optionally allow users to have singl

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Only require satisfaction of one AuthType in 2.2

I'm setting up a site using Apache httpd 2.2 and an existing Kerberos infrastructure and would like to optionally allow users to have single sign-on with an existing Kerberos ticket. I'm using the Debian packaged [1] mod_auth_kerb [2] to accomplish the authentication which is all working smoothly.