Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Deny/Allow directives within have no effect [Workaround]

2008-09-30 Thread Steffen Neumann
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 22:28 +0200, André Warnier wrote: > The first thing maybe to check is if you don't by any chance have some > sections that override your section. Yup, that got me on the right track. I had a spurious I copied from a httpd.conf that was used for an application on a dedic

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Deny/Allow directives within have no effect [Workaround]

2008-09-29 Thread Eric Covener
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:20 PM, André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eric Covener wrote: Order deny,allow Allow from 192.168 Deny from all AllowOverride All Options -Indexes >> JkMount /protected/jsp/* tomcat_w

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Deny/Allow directives within have no effect [Workaround]

2008-09-29 Thread André Warnier
Eric Covener wrote: Order deny,allow Allow from 192.168 Deny from all AllowOverride All Options -Indexes JkMount /protected/jsp/* tomcat_worker 141.x.x.x - - [23/Sep/2008:13:28:34 +0200] "GET /protected/index.html HTTP/1.0" 200 7675 "-" "Wget/1.11"

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Deny/Allow directives within have no effect [Workaround]

2008-09-29 Thread Eric Covener
>> >> Order deny,allow >> Allow from 192.168 >> Deny from all >> AllowOverride All >> Options -Indexes >> >> JkMount /protected/jsp/* tomcat_worker >> 141.x.x.x - - [23/Sep/2008:13:28:34 +0200] "GET /protected/index.html >> HTTP/1.0" 200 7675 "-" "Wget/1

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Deny/Allow directives within have no effect [Workaround]

2008-09-29 Thread André Warnier
Hi. On the face of it, I do not understand it either. I have re-read the doc, and I believe your Order, Allow and Deny directives are correct for what you want to do. The first thing maybe to check is if you don't by any chance have some sections that override your section. Also, I encoun

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Deny/Allow directives within have no effect [Workaround]

2008-09-29 Thread Steffen Neumann
Hi, Just for the record, I worked around the problem using a rewrite to a 404 page for the clients not allowed. I'm still curious about the actual problem. Anyone ? Do I need to provide some more details ? Yours, Steffen On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 13:48 +0200, Steffen Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > Se