Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AuthBasicProvider ldap dbd not failing through

2008-01-24 Thread paredes
Hi! It was an interesting experiment. You're correct. "AuthBasicProvider file ldap", or "ldap file" or "file dbd" or "dbd file" either authenticate or fail through correctly. Looks like ldap and dbd can't co-exist at least as apache 2.2.8. Regards, -bill Eric Covener wrote: On Jan 24, 200

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AuthBasicProvider ldap dbd not failing through

2008-01-24 Thread Eric Covener
On Jan 24, 2008 3:36 PM, paredes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I shudder to think about doing this for 720 medical students, some 1200 > house staff, another 1000 or so affiliated faculty. However, being that > you mention "file" below, it's worth exploring if I can set up > AuthBasicProvider with a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AuthBasicProvider ldap dbd not failing through

2008-01-24 Thread paredes
I shudder to think about doing this for 720 medical students, some 1200 house staff, another 1000 or so affiliated faculty. However, being that you mention "file" below, it's worth exploring if I can set up AuthBasicProvider with a null or empty file [AuthBasicProvider file ldap dbd] so that ld

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AuthBasicProvider ldap dbd not failing through

2008-01-24 Thread Eric Covener
On Jan 24, 2008 3:13 PM, paredes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > Only the 1st provider hits and returns "user not found" or "password > mismatch". The 2nd provider is never seen. I had expected to see some > type of error related to the 2nd provider. In the case where I use > "AuthBasicProvide

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AuthBasicProvider ldap dbd not failing through

2008-01-24 Thread paredes
Hi! Only the 1st provider hits and returns "user not found" or "password mismatch". The 2nd provider is never seen. I had expected to see some type of error related to the 2nd provider. In the case where I use "AuthBasicProvider ldap dbd" & provide a valid ldap user:password the logs show lda

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AuthBasicProvider ldap dbd not failing through

2008-01-24 Thread Eric Covener
On Jan 24, 2008 2:39 PM, Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For LDAP, this is normally not being able to convert the basic auth > username into a DN on the LDAP server. I just verified that on 2.2.8 mod_authnz_ldap "gets out of the way" for authentication when it's first and can't lookup a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AuthBasicProvider ldap dbd not failing through

2008-01-24 Thread Eric Covener
On Jan 24, 2008 2:22 PM, paredes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetings! > > I've successfully built apache2.2.8 with all the appropriate modules > [mod_authn*, mod_authz*, mod_dbd*, mod_ldap* etc etc] for ldap & mysql > support. An ldap [valid-user] protected area works fine. A mysql > [valid-user

[EMAIL PROTECTED] AuthBasicProvider ldap dbd not failing through

2008-01-24 Thread paredes
Greetings! I've successfully built apache2.2.8 with all the appropriate modules [mod_authn*, mod_authz*, mod_dbd*, mod_ldap* etc etc] for ldap & mysql support. An ldap [valid-user] protected area works fine. A mysql [valid-user] protected area works fine. A mysql [require-dbd-group] group pro