Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 on Solaris 10 (libgcc_s.so problems after compiling)

2008-03-06 Thread Greg W. Smith
Lloyd -- thanks for all your help. Lari revealed the following: # lari httpd libgcc_s.so.1 => (file not found) libgcc_s.so.1 => (file not found) [2:0]: __ashldi3(): /usr/local/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 [2:0P]: __ashldi3(): httpd [2:0]: __ashrdi3(): /usr/local/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 [2:0P]: __ashrdi3(): httpd

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 on Solaris 10 (libgcc_s.so problems after compiling)

2008-03-05 Thread Lloyd Parkes
Greg W. Smith wrote: Lloyd -- thanks for the information. I actually tried the LD_OPTIONS='-L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib' as well with no luck. I got the same output as you noted in your message. If you run a Solaris program with LD_DEBUG set to suitable values, the runtime linker will

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 on Solaris 10 (libgcc_s.so problems after compiling)

2008-03-05 Thread Greg W. Smith
Lloyd -- thanks for the information. I actually tried the LD_OPTIONS='-L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib' as well with no luck. I got the same output as you noted in your message. Greg Lloyd Parkes wrote: Greg W. Smith wrote: libgcc_s.so.1 => (file not found) libgcc_

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 on Solaris 10 (libgcc_s.so problems after compiling)

2008-03-05 Thread Lloyd Parkes
Greg W. Smith wrote: libgcc_s.so.1 => (file not found) libgcc_s.so.1 => (file not found) libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc is sometimes found. Here are my compile options: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --enable-so --ena

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 on Solaris 10 (libgcc_s.so problems after compiling)

2008-03-05 Thread Greg W. Smith
All -- I know there have been some messages in the past, however I have not run into this problem until I upgraded from Solaris 2.9 to Solaris 2.10. Everything seems to compile correctly however upon closer inspection libgcc_s.so.1 is not found at runtime. I am currently using gcc version 3.