RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 Windows 2003

2007-11-06 Thread Blasdel, Jerry
- From: Blasdel, Jerry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 01:55 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 Windows 2003 For Apache 2.2.2 we did not have to. We went ahead and tried to install the Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 Windows 2003

2007-10-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Blasdel, Jerry wrote: For Apache 2.2.2 we did not have to. We went ahead and tried to install the Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable Package (x86) on the target server with no luck. Windows 2003 has a different permissions model. Are you sure you are either running command line without

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 Windows 2003

2007-10-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Blasdel, Jerry wrote: Is there a way to tell from the built objects if we inadvertently compiled for debug or not? We are calling _apacher and then installr in the Makefile.win. You had done right. All I can suggest is that VC has a nifty tool named depends.exe (it has a dll or two it require

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 Windows 2003

2007-10-31 Thread Blasdel, Jerry
@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 Windows 2003 Blasdel, Jerry wrote: > For Apache 2.2.2 we did not have to. We went ahead and tried to install > the Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable Package (x86) on the > target server with no luck. > > We did try to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 Windows 2003

2007-10-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Sander Temme wrote: On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:54 AM, Blasdel, Jerry wrote: For Apache 2.2.2 we did not have to. We went ahead and tried to install the Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable Package (x86) on the target server with no luck. We did try to recompile with VC++ Express and tried t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 Windows 2003

2007-10-31 Thread Sander Temme
On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:54 AM, Blasdel, Jerry wrote: For Apache 2.2.2 we did not have to. We went ahead and tried to install the Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable Package (x86) on the target server with no luck. We did try to recompile with VC++ Express and tried to generate intern

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 Windows 2003

2007-10-31 Thread Arthur Kreitman
What version of VC++ are you using, 2005? From: Blasdel, Jerry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:17 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 Windows 2003 Hello, We have Apache 2.2.6 compiled (our

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 Windows 2003

2007-10-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Blasdel, Jerry wrote: For Apache 2.2.2 we did not have to. We went ahead and tried to install the Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable Package (x86) on the target server with no luck. We did try to recompile with VC++ Express and tried to generate internal manifests for all exes and .so an

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 Windows 2003

2007-10-31 Thread Blasdel, Jerry
different error on the target machine ("The application failed to initialize properly"). -Original Message- From: Sander Temme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 01:28 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 Windows

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 Windows 2003

2007-10-31 Thread Sander Temme
On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:17 AM, Blasdel, Jerry wrote: We have Apache 2.2.6 compiled (our compile not using canned binaries) with VC++ Express and it is working for Windows XP but we just tried installing it to Windows 2003 Server and it will not recognize httpd.exe. If we run it from the co

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.6 Windows 2003

2007-10-31 Thread Blasdel, Jerry
Hello, We have Apache 2.2.6 compiled (our compile not using canned binaries) with VC++ Express and it is working for Windows XP but we just tried installing it to Windows 2003 Server and it will not recognize httpd.exe. If we run it from the command line we get "The system cannot execute the spe