AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2 as a static server (without PHP) to serve images

2008-03-31 Thread christian.folini
port 80 and 443. regs, Christian -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: thomas Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 31. März 2008 12:46 An: users@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2 as a static server (without PHP) to serve images > Sure, make a c

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2 as a static server (without PHP) to serve images

2008-03-31 Thread thomas Armstrong
> Sure, make a copy of the httpd.conf file, remove everything that refers > PHP (the LoadModule basically), then run a secondary Apache using that > config file. You'll have to use a different port of course and redirect > images and the like to the secondary apache. > > But... why? Thank you

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2 as a static server (without PHP) to serve images

2008-03-31 Thread Davide Bianchi
thomas Armstrong wrote: I was told that Apache 2.2 allows to create a secondary process which doesn't use PHP to serve images or static files without installing a secondary Apcache webserver or lighttpd. Sure, make a copy of the httpd.conf file, remove everything that refers PHP (the LoadModul

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2 as a static server (without PHP) to serve images

2008-03-31 Thread thomas Armstrong
Hi. I've got Apache 2.2 with PHP running on my Linux box to serve dynamic pages. I was told that Apache 2.2 allows to create a secondary process which doesn't use PHP to serve images or static files without installing a secondary Apcache webserver or lighttpd. Is it possible? How can I configure