e.www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 8:30 AM o haya wrote:
> Ahh... so something like this?
>
> gdb /ap
Hi,
This is a followup (but different problem) to a problem that I had posted
about previously.
In the earlier thread, I had been getting an "undefined symbol" problem,
and actually, it turned out that I had encountered that problem, and solved
it, years ago (almost 7 years ago, I think), but with
ctually working.
If I hit it with a telnet and manual request, I can see a response, but if
I use a browser I see segfaults in the Apache error_log..
I'll be working through these if I can, but thanks, Rainer, this is a step
forward and will make my weekend better :)!!
Jim
On Fri, Feb 7
Hi Rainer,
My apologies but I am going to switch to this gmail account because
something is causing responses to be blocked on Yahoo email :(, and I
wanted to see if this email would work better !!
In your last response you said:
"In theory, you could work around this by using LD_PRELOAD, but th
,
Jim
On Wed, 10/12/16, o haya wrote:
Subject: [users@httpd] Combine client certificate authentication plus database
or LDAP lookup?
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Cc: oh...@yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, October 12, 2016, 3:13 PM
Hi,
I was wonderi
Hi,
I was wondering if there is a way to combine client certificate authentication
with an LDAP or database lookup in Apache?
What I mean is:
- Apache performs 2-way SSL handshake with user browser and if that
authentication is successful, then
- Apache (some Apache module) gets the CN string
I noticed that there's two "modules" in the path, e.g.,
.../modules/modules/mod_authn_file.so.
Are you modules's .so files actually in apache/modules/modules directory?
Or are they in /apache/modules directory?
On Fri, 5/13/16, Hemant Chaudhary wro
Hi,
I am trying to use the AuthBasicFake directive in Apache 2.4.20:
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/mod_auth_basic.html#authbasicfake
My understanding is that when that directive is processed, it will send an
Authorization header to the backend server.
However, I have tried examples l
uests, so now we are wondering if
maybe it's possible that Apache somehow is skipping the authentication if the
request is a CONNECT request. I know that that is a long shot, but I figured
that I'd ask.
Thanks,
Jim
----
On Wed, 5/4/16
Hi,
We are trying to use client certs with Apache 2.4.x (2.4.16) and to have Apache
check the client cert strings against users in an LDAP (and OpenDS instance but
are encountering what appears to be a timing problem between when Apache
authz_core is doing the authentication vs. when the FakeBa
r mail server.
Is there any other way to do this besides using mod_authz_ldap?
Thanks,
Jim
On Mon, 4/25/16, o haya wrote:
Subject: [users@httpd] Configure Apache to verify client certificate in an
LDAP server?
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Cc: oh
Hi,
I have the following situation:
- Apache configured for client-authenticated SSL
- An LDAP server (an OpenDS instance) containing all of our users
What we want to do is that after Apache performs the 2-way SSL handshake, that
somehow Apache verifies the certificate matches some user that is
arzh Hemon wrote:
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache won't start after install on Unix-like system
To: users@httpd.apache.org, "o haya"
Date: Friday, March 18, 2016, 12:08 PM
"What version of
Apache? I'm guessing it's 2.4.x? If so, 2.4+
uses
APR libraries.
Hi
What version of Apache? I'm guessing it's 2.4.x? If so, 2.4+ uses APR
libraries. If you can't get it to work, maybe you can try the latest 2.2+
version, e.g., 2.2.31 I think, which wouldn't require APR
On Fri, 3/18/16, Roparzh Hemon wrote:
t the Error 12/Expired CRL errors.
Jim
On Mon, 3/7/16, o haya wrote:
Subject: [users@httpd] SSL/CRL Problem - Error 12 (Expired)
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Cc: oh...@yahoo.com
Date: Monday, March 7, 2016, 8:43 PM
Hi,
I'm not sure if I s
Hi,
I'm not sure if I should post this to the openssl mailing list or here, but
thought that it'd make sense to start here. If that is not appropriate, please
let me know?
Anyway, we are upgrading some of our Apache instance to 2.4.16 (on Redhat), and
we are encountering a strange problem wi
Apache spawning even more children?
Thanks,
Jim
On Tue, 11/17/15, Daniel wrote:
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Getting "connection refused" Apache 2.4
To: "o haya" , "Yann Ylavic" ,
"users@httpd.apache.org"
haya
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Getting "connection refused" Apache 2.4
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:11 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:23 AM, o haya wrote:
>>
>> This is with the as-built Apache config
pache, built with the
above MPM model, may just not be able to sustain this kind of load error-free?
Thanks,Jim
From: o haya
To: "users@httpd.apache.org"
Cc: O. Haya
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Getting "connection refused" Apach
ple, I
get 500+ httpd instances at startup (e.g., ps -ef shows 500 instances). Is it
possible that something else (e.g., the Redhat OS itself) is limiting the
number of connections?
Thanks,Jim
From: Daniel
To: users@httpd.apache.org; o haya
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 3:07 PM
Subj
Hi,
I am trying to do some load testing of Apache 2.4 on Redhat.
Configuration displayed when I run "httpd -V" shows:
Server MPM: prefork
threaded: no
forked: yes (variable process count)
I am using Jmeter to test, and when I increase the number of simultaneous
threads to > 200, I am seeing i
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, October 27, 2015, 7:02 PM
Check the
manuals discussion of how a "worker" is indirectly
configured.
On Tue, Oct
27, 2015, 6:55 PM o haya
wrote:
Hi
Yann,
A CORRECTION.re. what I said about "ProxySet
keepalive=On/Off".
d let the
Apache proxy work for NTLM and no need for the "aside" connections
functionality?
FYI, I wanted to let you know that I checked, and our httpd was built with MPM:
prefork.
Thanks!
Jim
----
On Tue, 10/27/15, Yann Ylavic wrote:
Su
at least part of the time, but even then,
the pages seem for all 3 browsers seem to be appearing correctly :(...
Jim
----
On Mon, 10/26/15, o haya wrote:
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Persistent proxied connections with Apache 2.4.x?
To: "users@h
t the "proxy-initial-not-pooled" setting will not work for any
kind of production type situation?
Thanks!
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Yann Ylavic
To: users@httpd.apache.org; o haya
Cc:
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Persistent pro
From: o haya
To: "users@httpd.apache.org" ; o haya
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Persistent proxied connections with Apache 2.4.x?
From: o haya
To: "users@httpd.apache.org"
Cc: O. Haya
Sent: Friday, Octo
From: o haya
To: "users@httpd.apache.org"
Cc: O. Haya
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 5:02 PM
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Persistent proxied connections with Apache 2.4.x?
From: Eric Covener
To: users@httpd.apache.org; o haya
Sent: Friday, October 23, 20
From: Eric Covener
To: users@httpd.apache.org; o haya
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 8:14 AM
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Persistent proxied connections with Apache 2.4.x?
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:28 PM, o haya wrote:
> So I am wondering if there is a way to do this (make
Hi,
We want to use Apache 2.4.x to proxy through to some SharePoint instances using
NTLM logins. From testing, it looks like the Apache-to-SharePoint connections
need to be persistent, with "Connection: keepalive" in the request headers
going from Apache-to-SharePoint.
We can do this using a di
ost ~]# yum search apache | grep ssl
> mod_ssl.i386 : SSL/TLS module for the Apache HTTP server
>
>
> > Original Message
> >From: o haya
> >To: users@httpd.apache.org
> >Sent: Thu, Feb 10, 2011, 3:24 PM
> >Subject: [users@httpd] Problem solved was R
to respond with
403/Forbidden responses...
Thanks,
Jim
--- On Wed, 2/9/11, o haya wrote:
> From: o haya
> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Problem configuring proxy (forbidden error locally)
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 11:09 PM
> Hi,
>
> B
that correct?
Thanks,
Jim
--- On Wed, 2/9/11, o haya wrote:
> From: o haya
> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Problem configuring proxy (forbidden error locally)
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 10:23 PM
> Eric,
>
> Sorry for that. The sys
February 9, 2011, 9:58 PM
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:26 PM, o
> haya
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Eric and Igor,
> > The Apache proxy logs show "403" errors.
>
> Don't paraphrase the logs. Include them verbatim in your
> response.
>
> --
apache.org
Date: Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 9:56 PM
First un-comment the
#ProxyRequests On
and make it
ProxyRequests Off
if you want to run reverse proxy.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:26 PM, o haya wrote:
Hi Eric and Igor,
The Apache proxy logs show "403" errors.
I've been
Hi Eric and Igor,
The Apache proxy logs show "403" errors.
I've been hunting down all the deny/allows and directives/sections,
and these are all that I found in the httpd.conf:
Options FollowSymLinks
AllowOverride None
Options Indexes FollowSym
We are trying to use the Apache (2.0.x) that comes with Redhat to
reverse-proxy.
We have a pretty simple configuration. Basically, we have just 1
, with a bunch of ProxyPass/ProxyPassReverse directive-pairs, in
sections, e.g.:
ProxyPass http://test.host.com/Foo
ProxyPassReverse http
36 matches
Mail list logo
