Thanks makes sense and works well using require ldap-filter
-Tony
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 3:38 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] group authorization via LDAP
>
> > AuthLDAPGroupAttri
uire valid-user" and "require ldap-filter" work fine either way).
-Tony
> -----Original Message-
> From: Tony Rice (trice)
> Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 1:52 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [us...@httpd] group authorization via LDAP
>
> I&
I'm able to do LDAP based group authorization when specify the group
info as a filter in the LDAP URL but I'd like to configure a more
generic LDAP string in the apache config and allow users to control
access by group membership using .htaccess files. I'm able to
authenticate based on userid/pass
lemail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 4:36 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] group authorization via LDAP
>
> On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 17:18 -0400, Tony Rice (trice) wrote:
> > I'm trying to convert from DBM file based authentication an
I'm trying to convert from DBM file based authentication and
authorization to LDAP based authentication and authorization in Apache
2.2.11.
We've already got a large number of .htaccess files with specific
configs for individual directories that are using "require user" and
"require group". Is it
Be sure to configure it with Extended Status on to get a wealth of info.
-Tony
From: Boyle Owen [mailto:owen.bo...@six-group.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 3:36 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [us...@httpd] apache monitoring
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_stat
When is the Last-Modified header sent? Is it always sent unless unset
in the config? Is it only sent based on the content of the original
request?
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See
Yes, it's set to Full
-Tony
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 12:14 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Last-Modified header not sent in apache 1.3
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2
mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:25 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Last-Modified header not sent in apache 1.3
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Tony Rice (trice)
> wrote:
> > The maintainer of a crawler is complain
The maintainer of a crawler is complaining that responses from my apache
1.3 server aren't including the Last-Modified header. I've combed
through the config and don't see the header being unset anywhere. The
XBitHack is even set to on.
How can I force the Last-Modified header to be sent with ev
Are there any limits to the number of groups the LDAP module can handle
a particular user being a member of?
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html>
uot;max-age=0"
FireFox, Opera, etc all do fine with either config.
-Tony
> -----Original Message-
> From: Tony Rice (trice)
> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 4:41 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors when accessing PowerPoint and
> word fi
When accessing Microsoft PowerPoint or word files on my webserver, I'm
seeing errors accessing the file via IE (version 6 and 7) but problems
when using FireFox. The odd thing is that the problem only occurs when
specifying the full path to the URL. When clicking on the filename from
the Director
Is there another Log format available that shows more resolution than
seconds for time to serve a request? Perhaps in milliseconds?
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apa
I'm trying to bring up a server with mod_perl configuration original
created for an Apache 2.0 server but on an Apache 1.3 server. The
problem is that "PerlSwitches" isn't available on the mod_perl running
on the 1.3 server. How can I get this library path included on a 1.3
server?
PerlSwitche
We've had some instances where crawlers have stumbled onto a cgi script
which refers to itself and start pounding the server with requests to
that cgi.
There are so many CGI scripts on this server that I don't want to
maintain a huge robots.txt file. Any suggestions on other techniques to
keep cr
Any suggestions on configuration changes I can make to lessen the impact of CGI
scripts which become CPU hogs?
I'm running an apache server with about 150 virtual servers. Ocassionally an
errant script will go nuts and consume 100% of the CPU. It's really bad when a
spider finds one of these
17 matches
Mail list logo
