RE: [us...@httpd] Don't require authentication on a subfolder

> -Original Message- > From: Tom Evans [mailto:tevans...@googlemail.com] > Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 2:54 AM > Do you understand the difference between and ? Nope, but I do now. :) (snip) > I'm pretty sure you just want containers rather than > , like so: > ># All your SSPI di

RE: [us...@httpd] Don't require authentication on a subfolder

> -Original Message- > From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 3:45 PM > Any chance you have SSPI on in a Location container that would apply? I'm not sure I understand the question. (I should probably point out that I'm not an apache expert by any

RE: [us...@httpd] Don't require authentication on a subfolder

-Original Message- From: Peter Schober [mailto:peter.scho...@univie.ac.at] Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 2:10 PM > * Scott Brady [2009-07-30 21:50]: > > # This is the folder I want freely accessible > > > >

[us...@httpd] Don't require authentication on a subfolder

SSPIAuth Off Thanks! --- Scott Brady Lead Application Developer Memolink, Inc.

[us...@httpd] NT/AD authentication / IE / Windows XP

e "Enter your Redacted login" AuthType SSPI SSPIAuth On SSPIAuthoritative Off SSPIDomain redacted.lan SSPIOfferBasic Off Require valid-user Has anyone seen this before? I'd appreciate any help. -