Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite: LoadModule order is important?

Joshua Slive schrieb: On 9/4/07, Rainer Traut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, am running Redhat EL4 U5 with redhat's Apache/2.0.52. I noticed the order of loading the modules is important? Part of httpd.conf: LoadModule rewrite_module modules/mod_rewrite.so LoadModule proxy_mod

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite: LoadModule order is important?

Hi, am running Redhat EL4 U5 with redhat's Apache/2.0.52. I noticed the order of loading the modules is important? Part of httpd.conf: LoadModule rewrite_module modules/mod_rewrite.so LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so LoadModule proxy_http_module modules/mod_proxy_http.so If I load

[EMAIL PROTECTED] nokeepalive downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0 ssl-unclean-shutdown for IE6

Hi, we're running apache 2.2.3 on Redhat EL4.3 x86_64 with mod_proxy_ajp for our backend tomcat. All traffic is https. To tweak performance for our IE6 users we tried to leave this line commented out of our ssl.conf: BrowserMatch ".*MSIE.*" \ nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown \