> >
> >
> > Aug 5 22:10:59 mail sshd[67557]: fatal: fork of unprivileged
> child failed
> > Aug 5 22:11:44 mail sshd[67626]: fatal: fork of unprivileged
> child failed
> > Aug 5 22:16:04 mail sshd[68292]: fatal: fork of unprivileged
> child failed
> > Aug 5 22:16:31 mail sshd[68359]: fatal:
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Joshua
> Slive
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 6. August 2006 03:57
> An: users@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] server busy
>
>
> On 8/5/06, Mididoc Production
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Joshua
> Slive
> Gesendet: Samstag, 5. August 2006 21:10
> An: users@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] server busy
>
>
> On 8/5/06, Mididoc Productions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hello,
> >
> > we get
hello,
we get a message in apache log-file that the server is to busy and that we
should rise the amount:
[Sat Aug 5 17:08:53 2006] [info] server seems busy, (you may need to
increase StartServers, or Min/MaxSpareServers), spawning 8 children, there
are 2 idle, and 12 total children
At the mome
if you use an absolute path it works, doesn't it ?
eg http://www.yoururl.com/path/to/err.html
cheers mike roland
>
>
> i must say this:
> if the path is not EXACTLY the same in the apache config as it is in
> the Filesystem RELATIVE to wwwroot for that host, it 404's, though
> this is odd, how
thank you.
mike
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von Joshua
> Slive
> Gesendet: Samstag, 5. August 2006 02:46
> An: users@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LogLevel
>
>
> On 8/4/06,
t 2006 00:48
> An: users@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LogLevel
>
>
> On 8/4/06, Mididoc Productions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > I have a question concerning the Loglevel.
> >
> > We have the impression, that this h
hi,
I have a question concerning the Loglevel.
We have the impression, that this has only effect to the error-logs in the
virtual hosts and not at the error-log for the apache for the whole server.
We have set it to "error" and in vistual logs it reports only error, but in
apache error-log it re
or example"
# ulimit -c unlimited
# apachectl start
would you mind to help me with more details how to do that?
Thank you
Best regards
Mike Roland
>
> On 8/2/06, Mididoc Productions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi Joshua,
> &
> Google VSAP.
> This certainly isn't an apache problem.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Mididoc Productions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 9:35 AM
> Subject: AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] message /var/logs/messa
>
> What do you mean? Google tells you exactly what the error is. If you
> google for "untie attempted while 1 inner references still exist" you
> will get several versions of the perltie man page all of which give the
> exact error message and its cause.
>
> I'm not a perl guru, but as far as
> >
> > Aug 1 00:05:52 mail vsapd[27368]: untie attempted while 1
> > inner references
> > still exist at
> > /usr/local/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4/VSAP/Server/Modules/vsa
> > p/sys/logs.pm
>
> Is a "vps server" something to do with apache? Anyway, this is just some
> buggy code in the perl
.
Mike
>
>
> On 8/1/06, Mididoc Productions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hello, all,
> >
> > could anybody tell me please what this message in apache
> error_log means:
> >
> > [Tue Aug 1 22:33:20 2006] [notice] child pid 78700 exit signal
> S
hello, all,
could anybody tell me please what this message in apache error_log means:
[Tue Aug 1 22:33:20 2006] [notice] child pid 78700 exit signal Segmentation
fault (11)
thanks for a tip
mike
-
The official User-To-User s
hello,
my name is mike roland and i have a question as i'm a new learner:
we have a vps server and find a message in /var/logs/messages
which we don't understand:
Aug 1 00:05:52 mail vsapd[27368]: untie attempted while 1 inner references
still exist at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4/VSA
pamassassin mailing list for that, rather
> than the httpd list.
>
> try here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MailingLists
>
>
>
> Mididoc Productions wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > my name is mike roland.
> > i'm not a unix expert.
> >
>
Hello,
my name is mike roland.
i'm not a unix expert.
we have a vps server with for virtual host domains.
everything is working fine so far:
the webs are accessible the mails can be sent and received.
but we want to install a blacklist to refuse emails from certain
email-addresses for the whole
thank you will do.
mike
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: Boyle Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 30. Mai 2006 13:45
> An: users@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] htaccess
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: M
unfortunately the logfiles have been overwritten
will do a new install.
as soon as i get the same php messages i will store them and send them to
you.
but the questions rests, why the error treatment works with all tipped files
instead php extension.
if the user tips
/xxx/inde
/xxx/index.htm
etc.
>
> First off, it's not regarded as nice netiquette to repost to a
> mailing list after only 5 hours. After a week, maybe... but after
> 5 hours implies you think the rest of us exist merely to serve you :-)
I didn't realize that posting my message twice causes such a big problem for
you.
>
sorry to bug you again,
we have in the htaccess file a treatment for errors:
ErrorDocument 403 http://www.ourdomain.com
ErrorDocument 404 http://www.ourdomain.com
ErrorDocument 500 http://www.ourdomain.com
this is for redirecting any user to the mainpage, when he is searching a
file which does n
hi,
we have in the htaccess file a treatment for errors:
ErrorDocument 403 http://www.ourdomain.com
ErrorDocument 404 http://www.ourdomain.com
ErrorDocument 500 http://www.ourdomain.com
this is for redirecting any user to the mainpage, when he is searching a
file which does not exist.
this works
same here
mike
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Pax Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2005 22:39
> An: users@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Script to upgrade httpd.conf 1.3.x to 2.x?
>
>
> Jim,
>
> Thanks a million!! You, sir, are my he
hello,
we often get a message from windows events report:
source: userenv
event: 1517
user: NT-AUTORITÄT\SYSTEM
message:
Die Registrierung des Benutzers "LOCALHOST\Mike Roland" wurde gespeichert,
obwohl eine Anwendung oder ein Dienst auf die Registrierung während der
Abmeldung zugegriffen hat.
all the modules you are using in the previous
> version.
> You should be able to use the old config file, as it is and just stop
> the old ans start the new apache.
> HTH
> Aman Raheja
>
> Mididoc Productions wrote:
>
> >hello,
> >
> >we are still using ap
hello,
we are still using apache vers. 2.0.43
we want to upgrade to the current version.
could anybody give us some tips, how to convert the old config files into
the new version without so much work?
What are the major changings and for what we must pay attention?
thank you very much for a tip
hi,
if you fear spam, wurms, viruses etc.
we are protected by a e-mail redirection system, which works outside of the
computer, which don't slow the computer therefor,
and we are having no more trouble since a long time. and the best: all is
for free.
just look:
https://www.eleven.de/en/
cheers
In the skype configuration I didn't find anything helping. There is an
option to switch off port 80 for return messages from skype, but that didn#t
change anything.
in fact the tip from alexander helped me. Here's what he said:
I assume you installed SP2 for XP, right?
In this case, this is
thanks
mike
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: Alexander Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Montag, 30. Mai 2005 12:17
> An: users@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: AW: Antw: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache problem
>
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> simply restoring the original tcpip.sys file should get y
hi alexander,
thank you for this tip.
it really solved our problem.
if from any reason we would like to restore the original configuration, what
would we have to do then?
mike
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Alexander Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Montag, 30. Mai 2005
hello,
to everybody, we are new: Mike Roland in Carcassonne.
(and at once coming with a problem)
we are long time working with apache2 version 2.0.43 (Win32) without any
problems. We use apache as our local server to make run our 4 internet-sites
port 80,81,82,83 etc.
So far no problem.
We have
31 matches
Mail list logo
