[users@httpd] Verizon Digital Voice

2022-12-04 Thread Michael D. Berger
, Mike --- Michael D. Berger m.d.ber...@ieee.org <mailto:m.d.ber...@ieee.org> http://www.rosemike.net

RE: [users@httpd] Possible virus via httpd server

2016-01-05 Thread Michael D. Berger
) suspected an order problem in the includes, and sure enough, they were out of order, which I corrected in under one minute. It now works with no problem. Thanks for your efforts and interest. Mike. -- Michael D. Berger m.d.ber...@ieee.org http://www.rosemike.net/ _ From: Michael

RE: [users@httpd] Possible virus via httpd server

2016-01-04 Thread Michael D. Berger
d.config slowly. Thanks, Mike. -- Michael D. Berger m.d.ber...@ieee.org http://www.rosemike.net/ _ From: Michael D. Wood [mailto:m...@itsecuritypros.org] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 20:27 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Possible virus via httpd server Was the in

RE: [users@httpd] Possible virus via httpd server

2016-01-04 Thread Michael D. Berger
It was not overwritten. If you looked on the server, it was just fine. But an executable was delivered instead. In any case, it is gone with the wind -- DBAN is now running on the server. Hopefully, the reinstallation will work better. Mike. -- Michael D. Berger m.d.ber...@ieee.org http

RE: [users@httpd] Possible virus via httpd server

2016-01-04 Thread Michael D. Berger
I tried the submission you suggest. It said it is an executable file, suitable for my Linux box. I don't think I am about to run it. Note that my ESET NOD32 virus software finds nothing wrong with it. Thanks, Mike. -- Michael D. Berger m.d.ber...@ieee.org http://www.rosemik

RE: [users@httpd] Possible virus via httpd server

2016-01-04 Thread Michael D. Berger
. Thanks, Mike. -- Michael D. Berger m.d.ber...@ieee.org http://www.rosemike.net/ > -Original Message- > From: Keith Roberts [mailto:keith.robe...@ecric.nhs.uk] > Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 11:25 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Possible virus v

RE: [users@httpd] Possible virus via httpd server

2016-01-04 Thread Michael D. Berger
Examining with Lemmy (A Windows version of VI), it looks like a binary file. Size is 181.4 KB. I am considering my favorite virus remover: DBAN, but it would take several days work to recover from that. Mike. -- Michael D. Berger m.d.ber...@ieee.org http://www.rosemike.net/ > -Origi

[users@httpd] Possible virus via httpd server

2016-01-03 Thread Michael D. Berger
Using my WinXP Firefox client to access my previously working httpd 2.4 server on Fedora 23 gets a file named 1OfvyQ5L instead of my index.html . Do you think I have a virus on my Linux box? I did notice that my iptables is not as tight as it should be. -- Michael D. Berger m.d.ber...@ieee.org

RE: [users@httpd] LogMessage not working

2016-01-01 Thread Michael D. Berger
> -Original Message- > From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de] > Sent: Friday, January 01, 2016 19:07 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] LogMessage not working > > Am 01.01.2016 um 22:55 schrieb Michael D. Berger: >

RE: [users@httpd] LogMessage not working

2016-01-01 Thread Michael D. Berger
> -Original Message- > From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de] > Sent: Friday, January 01, 2016 05:56 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] LogMessage not working > > Am 01.01.2016 um 03:55 schrieb Michael D. Berger: > > I a

[users@httpd] LogMessage not working

2015-12-31 Thread Michael D. Berger
Happy New Year! Mike. -- Michael D. Berger m.d.ber...@ieee.org http://www.rosemike.net/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

RE: [users@httpd] RewriteCond to select by username FIXED

2013-07-13 Thread Michael D. Berger
> -Original Message- > From: Michael D. Berger [mailto:m.d.ber...@ieee.org] > Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 13:12 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: RE: [users@httpd] RewriteCond to select by username > > > > > -Original Message- >

RE: [users@httpd] RewriteCond to select by username

2013-07-13 Thread Michael D. Berger
> -Original Message- > From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 12:43 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] RewriteCond to select by username > > On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Michael D. Berger > wr

[users@httpd] RewriteCond to select by username

2013-07-13 Thread Michael D. Berger
On my fedora 16 box using httpd.x86_64 2.2.21-1.fc16, using SSL, I tried: ... RewriteCond %{REMOTE_USER} ^mike$ RewriteRule ... and variations thereof. My intention is to have the RewriteRule run iff "mike" is logged on. It didn't work. Thanks for your advice. Mike. --

[users@httpd] Chrome 300 Problem

2011-08-06 Thread Michael D. Berger
Running: # rpm -q httpd httpd-2.2.3-31.el5.centos.4 On: # uname -a Linux mbrc20 2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Mar 17 11:37:14 EDT 2010 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux Accessing a directory: www.myplace.net/here/there/ where both "here" and "there" require httpd access, while www.myplace.net/ does no

[users@httpd] Re: cannot run mod_status

2011-04-05 Thread Michael D. Berger
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 14:28:34 -0400, Yehuda Katz wrote: > [[RESEND]] > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Michael D. Berger < > m_d_berger_1...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Same result, 403 when I do: >> /server-status >> I note that I also get 403 for: >

[users@httpd] Re: cannot run mod_status

2011-04-05 Thread Michael D. Berger
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 10:31:01 -0400, Yehuda Katz wrote: > Thanks. I tried it and I still get 403. >> >> > The next thing that I try is explicitly setting Allow from all: Order > allow,deny > Allow from all Same result, 403 when I do: http://my.stuff.net/server-status I note that I also get 4

[users@httpd] Re: cannot run mod_status

2011-04-05 Thread Michael D. Berger
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:56:08 -0400, Yehuda Katz wrote: > The first thing I always try is removing/commenting the access control > directives, something like this: > > SetHandler server-status > # Order deny,allow > # Deny from all > # Allow from 192.168.9.0/24 127.0.0.1 > > Then you will

[users@httpd] cannot run mod_status

2011-04-05 Thread Michael D. Berger
On my CentOS 5 box with: #rpm -q httpd httpd-2.2.3-43.el5.centos.3 I tried to activate mod_status with: ExtendedStatus On SetHandler server-status Order deny,allow Deny from all Allow from 192.168.9.0/24 127.0.0.1 I already have: LoadModule stat

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache problem with soft link

2006-01-24 Thread Michael D. Berger
oft link name. I have tried numerous combinations, and can make no sense of it. For example: These fail: Thess work: In all cases, the correct links are in place. You can see where my work-around is comming from. Thanks for your help. Mike. -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache problem with soft link

2006-01-23 Thread Michael D. Berger
quot; made might be the problem, changed the order by changing the first letter of the directory in question to upper case (they are usually lower case). It made no difference. Any suggestions would be much appreciated. Mike. -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Configuring apache as a gateway for another domain on another server

2005-11-06 Thread Michael D. Berger
If nothing else is suggested, I think that this could be done with NetFilter (http://www.netfilter.org/). Hopefully, something else will be suggested. Mike. -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Bart Heinsius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sen

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] unexpected RewriteRule behavior

2005-11-02 Thread Michael D. Berger
note, however, that, as verified by debug logging, the arguments following ? do appear in argv of index.cgi (C++), suggesting that RewriteRule does see the arguments. Aside from that, I wonder if there is any reason not to use argv[0] to determine the current directory? (I note that in some cases ot

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] unexpected RewriteRule behavior

2005-11-01 Thread Michael D. Berger
> -Original Message- > From: Rich Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 7:24 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] unexpected RewriteRule behavior > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 &

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] unexpected RewriteRule behavior

2005-11-01 Thread Michael D. Berger
> -Original Message- > From: Michael D. Berger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] > [...] > > From: Rich Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [...] > > Michael D. Berger wrote: > > > The following: > > > > >RewriteCond %{

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] unexpected RewriteRule behavior

2005-11-01 Thread Michael D. Berger
[...] > From: Rich Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] > Michael D. Berger wrote: > > The following: > > >RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^.*/picts/.*$ > >RewriteRule ^/(.*/)?$ /index.cgi [L] > > > > sends > >GET /favicon.ico > >

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] unexpected RewriteRule behavior

2005-10-31 Thread Michael D. Berger
Sorry, I forgot to mention: RH-E-WS-4 httpd-2.0.52-9.ent Mike. -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Michael D. Berger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 9:24 PM > To: Apache-Users > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] unexpec

[EMAIL PROTECTED] unexpected RewriteRule behavior

2005-10-31 Thread Michael D. Berger
because it does not appear to match any pattern. Wherein do I err? Thanks for your help. Mike. -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http

[EMAIL PROTECTED] NTLMSSP attacks

2005-09-05 Thread Michael D. Berger
. Mike. -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Block File Types

2005-08-06 Thread Michael D. Berger
> -Original Message- > From: Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 10:19 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Block File Types > > > On 8/6/05, Michael D. Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Block File Types

2005-08-06 Thread Michael D. Berger
I would like to prevent Apache 2.0 from sending any file of a particular type. In my VirtualHost I put: RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^.*notThis\?*$ RewriteRule ^.*$ /zzz [L] Is there a better way? Thanks, Mike. -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Block File Types

2005-08-06 Thread Michael D. Berger
> -Original Message- > From: Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 11:40 AM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Block File Types > > > On 8/6/05, Michael D. Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with Redirect

2005-07-27 Thread Michael D. Berger
I have not been able to get Redirect to work. Particulars are below. Advice would be much appreciated. Thanks, Mike. -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- DNS has cnames www.mysite.net and test.mysite.net Linksys routes port 80 to 192.168.1.10 On 192.168.1.10, running RH-E-WS-3: (I

RE: [users@httpd] logging from cgi

2005-06-21 Thread Michael D. Berger
Very interesting. Do you think that it is better than syslog for my purpose? Thanks, Mike. -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Bohumil Holubec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 10:33 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org &

RE: [users@httpd] logging from cgi

2005-06-20 Thread Michael D. Berger
cgi.2, etc. that I think syslog will generate. Further suggestions much appreciated. Mike. -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Boyle Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 4:21 AM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subj

[users@httpd] logging from cgi

2005-06-18 Thread Michael D. Berger
g(LOG_INFO,"entered"); closelog(); Thanks, Mike. -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.htm

RE: [users@httpd] Missing User-Agent:

2005-06-17 Thread Michael D. Berger
just sent to the list. Mike. -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: herauthon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 9:16 AM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Missing User-Agent: > > >

[users@httpd] NTLMSSP in ethereal

2005-06-17 Thread Michael D. Berger
hernet frame size, which to me, does not make sense. Thanks for your help, Mike. -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apac

RE: [users@httpd] Missing User-Agent:

2005-06-07 Thread Michael D. Berger
> -Original Message- > From: Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 9:52 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Missing User-Agent: > > > On 6/5/05, Michael D. Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

RE: [users@httpd] Missing User-Agent:

2005-06-05 Thread Michael D. Berger
> -Original Message- > From: Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 12:03 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Missing User-Agent: > > > On 6/4/05, Michael D. Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > &

[users@httpd] Missing User-Agent:

2005-06-04 Thread Michael D. Berger
I notice that Apache 2.0 rejects, with a 403, a GET that does not have a User-Agent header, and I to get some of these. Why do I get them? Why are they rejected? Thanks, Mike -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The

[users@httpd] X's in HTTP GET

2005-06-04 Thread Michael D. Berger
Here is an excerpt from a GET packet from IE-6.0-SP-1 on Win2k: Accept-Language: en-us\r\n XXX: X\r\n User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0)\r\n What are all these X's? Thanks, Mike. -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROT

RE: [users@httpd] Newbie CGI: nested href

2005-06-04 Thread Michael D. Berger
Indeed, one "non-standard" link had to be corrected. Later I'll run find...grep to check for other problems. Mike. -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Dan Mahoney, System Admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, Jun

RE: [users@httpd] Newbie CGI: nested href

2005-06-04 Thread Michael D. Berger
Problem solved by pathcing the href in the outgoing response. Mike. -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Michael D. Berger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 12:34 AM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: RE: [

RE: [users@httpd] Newbie CGI: nested href

2005-06-03 Thread Michael D. Berger
I have a legacy tree with numerous branches, and many relative links. I was hoping to get it all with one CGI. Mike. -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Dan Mahoney, System Admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 12:3

[users@httpd] Newbie CGI: nested href

2005-06-03 Thread Michael D. Berger
I do? 1. I could carry the last path in a cookie and construct the full path. But this would only work for nodes that accept cookies. 2. I could change all the paths to absolute. Much much work. Any better suggestions? Thanks in advance. Mike. -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL

RE: [users@httpd] one cookie for all html

2005-05-24 Thread Michael D. Berger
> -Original Message- > From: Michael D. Berger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 10:25 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] one cookie for all html > > > > > -- > Michael D. Berger > [EMAIL PROT

RE: [users@httpd] one cookie for all html

2005-05-23 Thread Michael D. Berger
-- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 9:33 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] one cookie for all html > > > On 5/23/05, Michael D.

RE: [users@httpd] one cookie for all html

2005-05-23 Thread Michael D. Berger
> -Original Message- > From: Joshua Slive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 12:01 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] one cookie for all html > > > On 5/20/05, Michael D. Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[users@httpd] Redhat WS compime problem

2005-05-21 Thread Michael D. Berger
install There is plenty of action, but my old version is not replaced. For what it is worth, in the make directory, I note a new file named httpd, with a size of 6389. This seems rather small. Thanks in advance for your advice. Mike. -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED

[users@httpd] one cookie for all html

2005-05-20 Thread Michael D. Berger
I would like to manage one cookie for all the myriad files in my tree. This would be easy if the one cgi script in the root were called irrespective of the contents of the GET. Can this be done? How? Thanks, Mike. -- Michael D. Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED