Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_cache

2005-11-09 Thread Matthew R. Hamilton
mayco=10.1.192.213.1130532590511892" --> 2302 <--- 10.1.192.213 www.mayco.com - [09/Nov/2005:17:10:29 -0600] "GET /images/corp04/about_may.gif HTTP/1.1" 304 - "http://www.mayco.com/common/index.html"; "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_cache

2005-11-09 Thread Matthew R. Hamilton
, as well as the IBM Edge Component that they are replacing. --- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/9/05, Matthew R. Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is there anything out there that will help me verify cache hits and misses? > > I thought I

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_cache

2005-11-09 Thread Matthew R. Hamilton
Root folder for disk cache. Is there anything out there that will help me verify cache hits and misses? Thanks p.s. I will look into apache 2.1.x after we get through this holiday season. Matthew --- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/9/05, Matthew R. Hamilton <[EMAIL PRO

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_cache

2005-11-08 Thread Matthew R. Hamilton
I am looking to set up some caching apache servers to offload commonly accessed static content. We had been using IBM's WebSphere Edge Components 5.0.2 until we started experiancing issues where the ibmproxy process would constantly crash, but not in any sort of predictable manner. We currently d

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_cache

2005-11-08 Thread Matthew R. Hamilton
I am looking to set up some caching apache servers to offload commonly accessed static content. We had been using IBM's WebSphere Edge Components 5.0.2 until we started experiancing issues where the ibmproxy process would constantly crash, but not in any sort of predictable manner. We currently d