On Fri, 2024-10-18 at 09:26 -0400, Thad Humphries wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 2:51 PM John Iliffe wrote:
> > I asked a similar question to this two weeks ago but now I have a bit more
> > information so please
> > treat this as a new question.
> >
> &
I asked a similar question to this two weeks ago but now I have a bit more
information so please
treat this as a new question.
When one of my screens (at least one) connects to a third-party web site to
pass some data to them I
get warnings from Firefox about the JSSESION cookie not having the c
Can anyone quickly give me info on how to set the "samesite" cookie. What I
need to know is the
exact format.
Background: for a number of years we have been able to connect to our credit
card acquirer with
this cookie set in the first line of the PHP code.
:
setcookie("samesite","str
Thanks Marc. That might be difficult to do due to some technical
limitations. I will try it out as soon as I get a working
workstation.
John
==
On Wednesday 02/08/2023 at 3:03 am, Marc wrote:
I'm trying to test a new server located at internal IP 192.168.1.5.
The
production ser
ook at the name-based vhosts docs, too.
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 9:08 PM John Iliffe
wrote:
I'm trying to test a new server located at internal IP 192.168.1.5.
The
production server lives at IP 192.168.1.7 on the same network.
How can I force the browser to connect to the correct ser
I'm trying to test a new server located at internal IP 192.168.1.5. The
production server lives at IP 192.168.1.7 on the same network.
How can I force the browser to connect to the correct server? If I try
"http://192.168.1.5"; the redirect on the first (alphabetically) virtual
server redirect
Regards,
John
==
On Sat, 2023-05-20 at 18:46 -0400, Frank Gingras wrote:
> What is the new error?
>
> On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 5:24 PM John Iliffe wrote:
> > Thanks Frank.
> >
> > Hasn't started yet but at least the problem has moved to anothe
e new error?
>
> On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 5:24 PM John Iliffe wrote:
> > Thanks Frank.
> >
> > Hasn't started yet but at least the problem has moved to another line :-)
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > John
> > ==
> > On Sat, 2023-05-2
Sat, May 20, 2023 at 2:27 PM John Iliffe wrote:
> > Rocky Linux 9.0, new install
> > Rocky distro version of Apache/httpd
> >
> > As recommended I used the distro's download httpd and that has lead me into
> > a
> > week's worth of chasing phantoms.
&
Rocky Linux 9.0, new install
Rocky distro version of Apache/httpd
As recommended I used the distro's download httpd and that has lead me into a
week's worth of chasing phantoms.
Specifically, I copied the httpd.conf file from the old server (Apache.2.4.25)
to the new server and after clearing al
rom the main link are fine. It sounds like you
> saved the web page:
>
> https://apr.apache.org/download.cgi
>
> On Sun, May 7, 2023 at 1:02 AM John Iliffe wrote:
> > I decided to install Apache by compiling from source since this is the way I
> > have always done i
I decided to install Apache by compiling from source since this is the way I
have always done it in the past and as noted in one response, it is nice to know
exactly what you are running.
I ran into the rather odd result that the Apache APR files are not valid.
Specifically, I downloaded the apr
you use something Ubuntu or Debian based, no auto updates will happen. If
> I remember correctly, some RPM distros might have autoupdates on servers, but
> there should be a way to turn it off if you google it.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On May 5, 2023, at 6:42 PM, John
I'm setting up a new server that will use Apache as a web application.
What would be the best way to do it: Take the download that is available from
the distro repository or download and compile Apache separately? My concern is
that if I use the offered version then it will be automatically upda
Try
systenctl httpd stop,
then when ps -ef | grep httpd shows that httpd is gone
systemctl httpd start
to give the system time to release all the resources.
John
==
On Thu, 2022-12-15 at 17:28 -0700, Dan Nessett wrote:
> Thanks for the info. However, I don’t believe any of the problems s
Thanks Eric:
That is probably what is happening (now). There is a fairly obvious solution to
this problem then, just set up a JavaScript href=... switch using the original
page and let the browser request the proper one. Is there a general work around
for this sort of situation that will cause t
tead of the
linked page extension (.php)
So sort of out of the frying pan and into the fire!
Regards,
John
==
On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 22:57 +, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote:
> What about mod_cache? Is it stuck in the cache?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Sent wit
tiViews. If you don't use it
> intentionally, `Options -MultiViews` in your DocumentRoot might help.
>
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 3:36 PM John Iliffe wrote:
> >
> > Apache 2.4.25 on a Fedora server.
> >
> > Due to an emergency I created an html page saying
nds like mod_negotiation / MultiViews. If you don't use it
> intentionally, `Options -MultiViews` in your DocumentRoot might help.
>
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 3:36 PM John Iliffe wrote:
> >
> > Apache 2.4.25 on a Fedora server.
> >
> > Due to an emergency I c
Apache 2.4.25 on a Fedora server.
Due to an emergency I created an html page saying that a function was
unavailable. The old page (on the apache base directory) was page.php and the
emergency page was linked to that as page.php -> pagex.html. Worked perfectly.
Now the problem is resolved and I
First, thank you to all the folks who replied with possible solutions. This is
very much appreciated.
Second, we are a very small company with a geographically limited customer base.
(Canada) so we would not expect anything coming in from Panama.
My concern was/is that if I blacklist an IP, then
>
> +91 73500 12833
> deic...@gmail.com
>
> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
> LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool
>
> "Plant a Tree, Go Green"
>
> Make In India : http://www.makeinindia.com/home
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 9:47 PM
For the last week we have been getting hit on average about every 3 seconds by a
machine that appears to be in Panama. There should be no reason why this
machine would want to connect to us.
193.29.60.97 - - [25/Aug/2022:12:12:04 -0400] "GET /favicon.ico HTTP/1.1" 200
3262 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windo
Nothing to do with Apache, but you can eliminate the distraction of the
spurious line from grep by typing the command as:
ps -ef | grep [h]ttpd
'[h]ttpd' doesn't match 'httpd'
John
==
On Wednesday 21 February 2018 22:36:07 jose cabrera wrote:
> >> > What happens if you do ps -ef
Only one more idea comes to mind: What happens if you do
ps -ef | grep httpd
and
ps -ef | grep apache (without the '2' on the end)
That should at least check if Apache is running under httpd.
John
===
On Wednesday 21 February 2018 21:54:41 jose cabrera wrote:
> >
This is probably a Ubuntu issue and not an Apache problem since Apache
isn't getting installed. In that case, there would be no log entries.
But: on most Unix systems the Apache daemon runs as httpd and can be
controlled by /bin/apachectl. he could check if the
daemon is running by issuing
Please ignore this post.
I knew I was looking at it and not seeing it and the act of sending the
help request made me look again.
Fixed now.
Sorry for the noise.
John
===
On Thursday 08 February 2018 20:31:45 John Iliffe wrote:
> I have a HTTP mail cli
I have a HTTP mail client running on port 7080 on the server that must be
proxied through Apache.
Using a workstation, I can enter:
http://192.168.1.7:7080/mail.html
and it brings up the mail client correctly.
I tried to use ProxyPass/ProxyPassReverse to move the mail client to run on
port
yum doesn't know when you install a programme by compiling it that it is
there unless you update the package history database, so it goes by it's
previous record (the apache version that you superseded).
There is a yum option to exclude specific packages from a yum update. I
seem to recall tha
Try using the PHP5 version of php-fcgi.
Not sure what your problem might be but a few months ago I had a LOT of
trouble and couldn't get PHP7 php-fpm OR php-fcgi working so at the
suggestion of the PHP list I backed off to PHP5 and everything worked
exactly as expected.
Worth a try anyway!
Jo
If your web site is subject to the PCIA regulations (ie an e-commerce site
that takes credit cards) then this has been a requirement for the last
several years.
The easiest way is just a customer error document that gives the standard
message without the failed URL reference. Since the usual m
I am not on Apple here, and you don't say whether you are using php-fpm or
not, but assuming that you are, check the start up (sysctl or init.d) file
and be sure that the correct version of PHP is being started.
John
=
On Wednesday 31 May 2017 03:56:45 Roparzh Hemon
Didn't get a lot of help on the PHP list but the one fellow who tried is
still running PHP-5. So, I backed off to PHP-5.6.30 which is the most
recent stable version of PHP-5 and it worked perfectly.
If you look at the PHP-7.1.3 or 7.1.5 source in fpm_main.c there is a lot
of commentary about b
> I think you should try it on an php related list.
>
> sorry,
>
> Christian
>
> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 01:15:36PM -0400, John Iliffe wrote:
> > Hi Christian:
> >
> > I have been trying several things on this piece of frustration, with
> > very little
configured with chroot?
>
> regards,
>
> Christian
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:44:41AM -0400, John Iliffe wrote:
> > Hi Christian:
> >
> > Result: "No Input File Specified"
> >
> > First, thanks for spending the time to explain
Hi Christian:
Result: "No Input File Specified"
First, thanks for spending the time to explain this to me. To some extent
you are saying what I had already thought but I figured I must be missing
something!
The details:
Your second example seems to match exactly what I want to do so I cut a
Match "^/myapp/.*\.php(/.*)?$" "fcgi://localhost:9000/var/www/"
> enablereuse=on
>
> "
>
> In your environment you can request http://your.server/i_phpinfo.php
>
> regards,
>
> Christian
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:05:06PM -0400, John Iliffe
ttler wrote:
> hello John,
>
> Is ChrootDir activated?
>
> regards,
>
> Christian
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:42:37AM -0400, John Iliffe wrote:
> > Hi Christian:
> >
> > I just noticed that you put "" around the parameters to
> >
> > fcgi://127.0.0.1:9015/httpd/iliffe/$1
>
> regards,
>
> Christian
>
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 03:43:08PM -0400, John Iliffe wrote:
> > I'm not sure is this is the correct list to post these questions to,
> > since I now have things isolated to a single m
$
> > fcgi://127.0.0.1:9015/httpd/iliffe/$1
>
> regards,
>
> Christian
>
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 03:43:08PM -0400, John Iliffe wrote:
> > I'm not sure is this is the correct list to post these questions to,
> > since I now have things isolated to a sin
===
On Sunday 14 May 2017 11:42:53 Eric Covener wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 11:01 PM, John Iliffe wrote:
> > Sure:
> >
> > --
> > # namei -m /httpd/iliffe/i_phpinfo.php
> > f: /httpd/iliffe/i_phpinfo.php
> >
> > dr
t
> chroot to "/" and comment chdir and try again, just in case.
>
> 2017-05-14 17:42 GMT+02:00 Eric Covener :
> > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 11:01 PM, John Iliffe
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Sure:
> > >
> > > --
>
useful?
Sorry, and thanks for your prompt responses.
John
==
On Sunday 14 May 2017 11:42:53 Eric Covener wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 11:01 PM, John Iliffe wrote:
> > Sure:
> >
> > --
> > # namei -m /http
wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 7:56 PM, John Iliffe wrote:
> > Hi Eric:
> >
> > I downloaded the revised mod_proxy_fcgi.c from your link, retrieved
> > the backup of the original download of Apache-2.4.25, replaced the
> > modules/mod_proxy_fcgi.c, and recompiled us
modules directory.
Unfortunately, still have the same problem.
Any other ideas come to mind?
John
==
On Saturday 13 May 2017 16:00:47 Eric Covener wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 4:00 PM, John Iliffe wrote:
> > Wow! That was sure fast, Th
13, 2017 at 4:00 PM, John Iliffe wrote:
> > Wow! That was sure fast, Thanks Eric.
> >
> > I'm not quite sure how to handle a diff file like this so it will take
> > a while to try it out. Using the standard Linux/gcc utilities, is
> > there any way to fix
er).
John
===
On Saturday 13 May 2017 15:44:09 Eric Covener wrote:
> http://home.apache.org/~jim/patches/mod_proxy_fcgi-v3.patch
>
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 3:43 PM, John Iliffe
wrote:
> >> O/S Fedora 25, Apach
I'm not sure is this is the correct list to post these questions to, since
I now have things isolated to a single module in PHP-FPM, so please
redirect me if necessary. This is a continuation of the problems I was
having (on this list) installing a new server last month.
-
HP that was available with your operating system, because it
> would update PHP without allowing you control.
>
> Rather than modifying the standard installation of PHP, modify the
> actions of the program that updates your operating system.
>
> Arthur Johnston
> Meadowbrook K
hur E. Johnston wrote:
> What are the errors in your PHP-FPM.LOG?
>
>
> Arthur Johnston
> Meadowbrook Kennels
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: John Iliffe [mailto:john.ili...@iliffe.ca]
> Sent: Monday, May 01, 2017 7:53 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subj
#
#
Starts php-cgi but outputs "No Input file specified".
No error messages in http error log in either case.
John
==
On Monday 01 May 2017 21:13:01 John Iliffe wrote:
> Thanks Arthur.
>
> That was my initial thought, that t
rectory.
>
> Check your permissions.
>
> Arthur Johnston
>
> Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse
> The typos.
>
> > On May 1, 2017, at 1:20 PM, John Iliffe wrote:
> >
> > This is set to:
> >
> > max_execution_time = 30
> > max_input_t
==
On Monday 01 May 2017 15:08:17 Arthur E. Johnston wrote:
> John
>
> I am not near my computer right now.
>
> There is a setting in PHP.ini to extend the time for each process.
>
>
> Arthur Johnston
>
> Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse
> The typos.
&g
yes, you are correct, I may be barking up the wrong tree. The problem
is, I'm lost in the forest!
Regards,
John
=
On Monday 01 May 2017 01:54:26 Nick Kew wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-04-30 at 14:56 -0400, John Iliffe wrote:
>
> I find your post conf
Linux, Fedora 25, SELinux set to permissive and permissions on the
directories are correct.
John
On Monday 01 May 2017 00:57:36 Arthur E. Johnston wrote:
> What operating system?
>
> Arthur Johnston
> Meadowbrook Kennels
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Il
I have a new Apache 2.4.25 installation that I have been trying to get
running properly for a few months now. After many attempts to run PHP
using php-fpm, I finally reverted to mod-fcgid and I still can't get
everything to run properly.
Calling a PHP script, when the php.ini file is syntact
I posted a work-around for Apache-2.4.25 with mod_fcgid running PHP 7.1.3
returning "File Not Found" errors when the php file was available on
Tuesday, 18 April.
Seems things aren't quite that simple!
The relevant line in the php-ini file is in display_errors and I suggested
changing it to '
Having spent considerable time chasing this problem around over the last
few weeks (and a sincere thank you to Daniel for his assistance) here is
some information that might save some time for somebody!
Environment:
Apache 2.4.25 compiled from source
PHP 7.1.3 compiled from source
mod_fcgid down
pic).
How would you proceed to debug this? What additional logs are there or
other information as to what php-fpm thinks it is seeing?
> 2017-04-13 21:27 GMT+02:00 Frank :
> > On 13/04/17 02:18 PM, John Iliffe wrote:
> >> I'm still trying to figure out what is actuall
On Thursday 13 April 2017 15:27:01 Frank wrote:
> On 13/04/17 02:18 PM, John Iliffe wrote:
> > I'm still trying to figure out what is actually happening here and I
> > have a result that is truly confusing now.
> >
> > I decided to just route everything to php-fpm
y 12 April 2017 22:24:03 Frank wrote:
> > On 12/04/17 08:36 PM, John Iliffe wrote:
> > > See below.
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 12 April 2017 20:02:10 Frank wrote:
> > >> On 12/04/17 05:34 PM, John Iliffe wrote:
> > >>> I am converting my web page
On Wednesday 12 April 2017 22:24:03 Frank wrote:
> On 12/04/17 08:36 PM, John Iliffe wrote:
> > See below.
> >
> > On Wednesday 12 April 2017 20:02:10 Frank wrote:
> >> On 12/04/17 05:34 PM, John Iliffe wrote:
> >>> I am converting my web pa
See below.
On Wednesday 12 April 2017 20:02:10 Frank wrote:
> On 12/04/17 05:34 PM, John Iliffe wrote:
> > I am converting my web pages from mod_php to php-fpm, following the
> > directions found at: https://wiki.apache.org/httpd/PHP-FPM Testing
> > to date indicates th
I am converting my web pages from mod_php to php-fpm, following the
directions found at: https://wiki.apache.org/httpd/PHP-FPM Testing to
date indicates that on this server all scripts work properly under mod_php.
Both of the following were tried within a container for the
default virtual
>
> For example, where is that X-Frame-Options coming from? Do you
> have just "standard" modules enabled? Would you mind reducing your
> config for a vhost to the minimal set that still causes the problems and
> share that?
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Stefan
>
&
On Friday 07 April 2017 03:53:55 Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2017-04-07 7:19 GMT+03:00 John Iliffe :
> > I just enabled http2 on our server and tested using curl. The test
> > page is a static html page with nothing but some random characters on
> > it, and no css or oth
I just enabled http2 on our server and tested using curl. The test page is
a static html page with nothing but some random characters on it, and no
css or other secondary accesses.
The protocol line is set to allow http2
Protocols h2 h2c http/1.1
Everything seems to work with the exception of
> https://wiki.apache.org/httpd/php Plenty of people still use mod_php
> and it has been updated to work with HTTPD 2.4 and PHP 7.
>
> - Y
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 8:49 PM, John Iliffe wrote:
> > Reading several sources there is conflicting information as to what is
> &
Reading several sources there is conflicting information as to what is the
preferred way to implement PHP scripts. It appears that mod_php (how we do
things now) is deprecated so I would like to take advantage of a server
change to do things "right".
The documentation on mod_fcgid seems to sto
=
On Tuesday 28 March 2017 10:35:44 Kartik Vashishta wrote:
> Maybe this will help:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32977557/how-do-i-compile-apache-http
> d-2-4-16-with-systemd-support
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 9:35 AM, John Iliffe wrote:
> > Thank you
un/httpd/httpd.pid
ExecStart=/etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd start
ExecStop=/etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd stop
ExecReload=/etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd reload
>
> From: John Iliffe
> Reply: users@httpd.apache.org
>
> Date: 28 March 2017 at 4:35:52 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [u
ke this:
>
> d /var/run/httpd 770 webservd webservd
>
> Modify it to the user and group that runs your httpd daemon.
>
> This is needed because /run and /var/run are volatile and gets cleaned
> out at each reboot.
>
> /Mikael
>
> On 28/03/17 04:22, John Iliffe wrote:
>
First, I know this is probably not an Apache question, but I'm hoping that
someone on this list may have seen this problem before and knows the
solution.
I know this is going to be very long winded, my apologies in advance, but I
have done quite a bit of research so I have a good idea what won'
On Wednesday 22 March 2017 08:25:18 Rainer Canavan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 3:29 AM, John Iliffe wrote:
> > Just in case anyone is thinking about this, I managed to resolve it,
> > more by luck than by any plan.
> >
> > Basically, I just added links in
onday 20 March 2017 22:32:21 John Iliffe wrote:
> I hate to re-ask a question that I have asked before (in 2012) but I
> have a new version of Apache and the same problem again.
>
> I compiled Apache-2.4.25 from source, and also openssl-1.0.2k. In the
> Apache configuration I includ
I hate to re-ask a question that I have asked before (in 2012) but I have a
new version of Apache and the same problem again.
I compiled Apache-2.4.25 from source, and also openssl-1.0.2k. In the
Apache configuration I included "--with-ssl=/usr/openssl-1.0.2k" but now
when I try to start apa
and "else" branch printed the warning.
>
>
> I suggest you to check what is the actual value of NGHTTP2_VERSION_NUM.
>
> > checking for user-provided nghttp2 base directory...
>
> Try to specify the path explicitly,
> --with-nghttp2=PATH
>
> 2017-0
is on the maintainer, and has
> > > nothing to do with this project, sorry we can't be of more help.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 3:12 PM, John Iliffe
>
> wrote:
> > > > I am trying to compile Apache 2.4.25 on Fedora 25 Linux.
> >
ed up
> > nghttp2 around that same point a year ago and never had an issue.
> >
> > Anything to do with rpm installs is on the maintainer, and has nothing
> > to do with this project, sorry we can't be of more help.
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 3:12 PM
I am trying to compile Apache 2.4.25 on Fedora 25 Linux.
The current version of nghttp2 is installed:
-
[John@prod04 httpd-2.4.25]$ rpm -qv nghttp2
nghttp2-1.13.0-2.fc25.x86_64
-
-
/usr/lib64/libnghttp2.so.14
/us
On Thursday 29 October 2015 05:11:30 Hleb Valoshka wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is it possible to modify Location using mod_headers? I want to replace
> http:// with https:// but Header edit http://(.*) https://$1 does not
> work, neither with always. unset and set don't work as well, only add
> works.
>
Wh
Look at the first entry in the error log when you restart Apache. It should
show the version of OpenSSL and whether it started properly.
John
On Wednesday 06 May 2015 12:17:48 Daryl Rose wrote:
> Do to security vulnerabilities with OpenSSL, I've had to re
Someone should also bring to his attention that the web site will have to
comply with the PCIA requirements (all several hundred of them!) if he is
planning on taking credit and debit cards.
This is NOT a trivial undertaking for those small e-commerce businesses
that run their own servers.
Goo
As a general rule you can install any version of Apache on any version of
Linux. The question is how much work you are willing to do!
In the case of RHEL5, Red Hat is no longer supporting it so they don't keep
the repository up to date. Maybe the last version you can pull with yum or
up2date
] AH00094: Command line: '/usr/apache-2.4.9/bin/httpd'
BUT the libssl in use, and resulting from installing OpenSSL-1.0.1g, is
libssl-1.0.0
John
==
On Friday 18 April 2014 13:08:12 John Iliffe wrote:
> Re the version of OpenSSL, I reported this
Re the version of OpenSSL, I reported this last week to this list.
Seems that OpenSSL-1.0.1g is linked to libssl-1.0.0, not the usual
libssl-1.x.x format.
Probably a make file error, but it really seems to be 1.0.1g.
John
=
On Friday 18 April 2014 12:14:32 Christ
(PCRE is the Perl regular expression library and is required
by Apache. It is described somewhere in the INSTALL docs).
Good luck!
John
===
On Monday 14 April 2014 02:17:26 Basil wrote:
> John Iliffe iliffe.ca> writes:
> > I am compiling Apache-2.4.9 fr
On Sunday 13 April 2014 21:32:12 Nick Kew wrote:
> On 14 Apr 2014, at 00:34, John Iliffe wrote:
> > Here I am assuming that you are not using the O/S supplied OpenSSL
> > version and that you are either updating Apache or don't have OpenSSL
> > linked dynamically.
>
On Sunday 13 April 2014 19:44:11 Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 7:34 PM, John Iliffe wrote:
> > Well, after a weekend of absolute frustration I figured this one out.
> >
> > Because there is a paucity of documentation and given the importance
> > of Open
Well, after a weekend of absolute frustration I figured this one out.
Because there is a paucity of documentation and given the importance of
OpenSSL to the Apache community, I will give a full explanation as to what
happened and why, and I hope that the Apache maintainers will be interested
i
I'll recompile again and see if it runs. Maybe I was just too sleepy last
night!
Thanks again.
John
On Saturday 12 April 2014 01:49:09 Didier Spaier wrote:
> On 12/04/2014 03:40, John Iliffe wrote:
> > I am compiling Apache-2.4.9 from source with the new openssl 1.0.1g.
> > So
I am compiling Apache-2.4.9 from source with the new openssl 1.0.1g. So
far everything looks good EXCEPT that Apache won't start. After making a
number of tweaks to the configuration, I'm stuck. The error from httpd -t
is:
httpd: Syntax error on line 130 of /usr/apache-2.4.9/conf/httpd.con
Is there a command in Apache that lists the modules loaded with their
version numbers?
-M shows everything but without the version numbers.
-l does the same for modules that are compiled in.
I just updated to openssl 1.0.1g and I need to confirm that that is really
the version that is runnin
I'm no expert on this sort of problem but I notice that the first and last
addresses logged both point to:
name = voip-98-144-147-0.wi.rr.com.
name = voip-98-144-141-0.wi.rr.com.
Any chance someone is accessing your web site from a cell phone instant
messaging service?
Regards,
John
===
Apache has to start as root so it can get permission on the socket
(presumably 80). It then does an su to the uid it runs under. Could be
apache but you can have anything you want. It does not need write or
execute on any of the page directories just read. They could be owned by
you or you
On Saturday 25 May 2013 05:25:22 Nick Kew wrote:
> On 25 May 2013, at 01:48, John Iliffe wrote:
> > 176.8.88.90 - - [23/May/2013:18:46:46 -0400] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 5406
> > "http://www.world-mmo.com/"; 29135 289
>
> That's GET / .
>
>
On Saturday 25 May 2013 04:19:41 Walter H. wrote:
> On 25.05.2013 02:48, John Iliffe wrote:
> > Every day I get a number of lines like the following in the Apache
> > access log. Note that the response code is 200, successful. The
> > requested URL is NOT on my web site.
&g
Every day I get a number of lines like the following in the Apache access
log. Note that the response code is 200, successful. The requested URL is
NOT on my web site.
Does this imply that I have actually created an open proxy or relay? I
would expect some form of error response such as 404.
Check logrotate which is probably doing a 'kill -SIGHUP'. Look in the
Apache error log prior to the rotate for a message like this:
[Sun Apr 14 03:19:55.472903 2013] [mpm_event:notice] [pid 22674:tid
140605074487040] AH00494: SIGHUP received. Attempting to restart
Then the first error log ent
You might also check that the ENTIRE ifcfg-eth0 configuration is there. I
installed RHEL6 and the file was truncated for some reason. Fedora is very
similar so could have made the same error.
FYI, the entire file should look more or less like this:
DEVICE="eth0"
BOOTPROTO=none
NM_CONTROLLED="
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
