Hello,
Am 15.05.2019 um 13:43 schrieb Frank Gingras:
Nitin,
You will need to ask the folks that maintain your
distribution/repository for help with updated packages.
On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 01:18, Nitin Kadam mailto:nitinkadam1...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello Team,
I have ubuntu 14.04 web
Hello List,
we use latest apache 2.4.39 and various php-version connected with
proxy_fcgid.
previously we used mod_fastcgi to bind php-fpm to apache. Watching a
phpinfo() in this scenario offered also complete geodata section in
phpinfo.
mod_geoip ist installed and mod_fastcgi put this into $_S
be happy to have a fix in this case ;)
Thanks,
Hajo
Am 25.04.2019 um 11:43 schrieb Hajo Locke:
Hello,
Am 25.04.2019 um 09:51 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
Am 24.04.2019 um 16:22 schrieb Hajo Locke :
Hello List,
Apache is 2.4.39, System is Ubuntu 18.04 and 16.04
since yesterday evening we have
Hello,
Am 25.04.2019 um 09:51 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
Am 24.04.2019 um 16:22 schrieb Hajo Locke :
Hello List,
Apache is 2.4.39, System is Ubuntu 18.04 and 16.04
since yesterday evening we have massive mod_ssl problems with ssl stapling:
Apr 24 11:20:59 myhostname apache2[16094
Hello List,
Apache is 2.4.39, System is Ubuntu 18.04 and 16.04
since yesterday evening we have massive mod_ssl problems with ssl stapling:
Apr 24 11:20:59 myhostname apache2[16094]: [ssl:error] [pid 16094]
AH01941: stapling_renew_response: responder error
We had complaints about slow webpages,
Hello,
Am 03.04.2019 um 11:06 schrieb Rainer Canavan:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 10:18 AM LuKreme wrote:
On Apr 3, 2019, at 02:05, Hajo Locke wrote:
Is apache 2.2 exploitable by CVE-2019-0211 ?
Description says that first affected version is 2.4.17, but may be 2.2 was not
analyzed.
“Apache
Hello,
i have still a bunch of apache 2.2 servers. ;(
Is apache 2.2 exploitable by CVE-2019-0211 ?
Description says that first affected version is 2.4.17, but may be 2.2
was not analyzed.
Thanks,
Hajo
Hello,
Am 21.02.2019 um 05:29 schrieb Christophe JAILLET:
Le 20/02/2019 à 14:58, Hajo Locke a écrit :
Hello list,
this is Apache 2.4.34
I was asked if Apache is supporting HTTP Request Methode PATCH.
To be honest i did not really found something useful in the web.
Is Apache supporting this
Hello list,
this is Apache 2.4.34
I was asked if Apache is supporting HTTP Request Methode PATCH.
To be honest i did not really found something useful in the web.
Is Apache supporting this method and is an additionally modul required?
Iam not aware of allowing or forbidding PATCH in httpd.conf
Hello,
Am 09.01.2019 um 09:48 schrieb Hajo Locke:
Hello List,
have a interesting problem here.
I have a .htaccess with Errordocument containing Text to be displayed:
ErrorDocument 404 "not existing"
This works with standard URLs like http://example.com/fubar.htm
I get response
Hello List,
have a interesting problem here.
I have a .htaccess with Errordocument containing Text to be displayed:
ErrorDocument 404 "not existing"
This works with standard URLs like http://example.com/fubar.htm
I get response 404 and in Browser displayed text is correct.
Now i try URLs like
ov 5, 2018 at 9:43 AM Hajo Locke <mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>> wrote:
Hello List,
iam looking for a way to use define to create variables limited to
vhosts (apache 2.4).
Currently i have some vhosts and use this syntax:
define myvar mycontent.
Name of variables i
Hello,
thanks, for your answer.
Am 05.11.2018 um 13:54 schrieb David Spector:
Just in case it wasn't obvious, the message I just sent assumes that
your server is managed by WHM/cPanel. If not, just use Include
directives in your conf file.
sorry, i dont understand. Is this a documented feature
Hello List,
iam looking for a way to use define to create variables limited to
vhosts (apache 2.4).
Currently i have some vhosts and use this syntax:
define myvar mycontent.
Name of variables is in all vhosts the same, "mycontent" is different
and vhost related. Later i use this variable in
Hello,
Am 08.03.2018 um 08:54 schrieb Hajo Locke:
Hello,
Am 11.09.2017 um 14:58 schrieb Eric Covener:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Hajo Locke wrote:
Hello List,
currently i use classic mod_fastcgi (fastcgiexternalserver) with php-fpm,
which is quite reliable.
A disadvantage of this
Hello,
Am 11.09.2017 um 14:58 schrieb Eric Covener:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Hajo Locke wrote:
Hello List,
currently i use classic mod_fastcgi (fastcgiexternalserver) with php-fpm,
which is quite reliable.
A disadvantage of this setup is, that not every response-header set by
Hello,
Am 19.02.2018 um 10:11 schrieb Hajo Locke:
Hello,
Am 08.02.2018 um 19:33 schrieb Luca Toscano:
2018-02-02 12:20 GMT+01:00 Hajo Locke <mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>>:
Am 02.02.2018 um 07:05 schrieb Luca Toscano:
Hello Hajo,
2018-02-01 13:20 GMT+01:00 H
Hello,
Am 08.02.2018 um 19:33 schrieb Luca Toscano:
2018-02-02 12:20 GMT+01:00 Hajo Locke <mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>>:
Am 02.02.2018 um 07:05 schrieb Luca Toscano:
Hello Hajo,
2018-02-01 13:20 GMT+01:00 Hajo Locke mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>>:
Hello Lu
Hello Luca,
Am 05.02.2018 um 02:27 schrieb Luca Toscano:
Hi Hajo,
2018-02-01 3:58 GMT+01:00 Luca Toscano <mailto:toscano.l...@gmail.com>>:
Hi Hajo,
2018-01-31 2:37 GMT-08:00 Hajo Locke mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>>:
Hello,
Am 22.01.2018 um 11:54 sch
Am 02.02.2018 um 07:05 schrieb Luca Toscano:
Hello Hajo,
2018-02-01 13:20 GMT+01:00 Hajo Locke <mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>>:
Hello Luca,
Am 01.02.2018 um 09:10 schrieb Hajo Locke:
Hello Luca,
Am 01.02.2018 um 04:46 schrieb Luca Toscano:
Hi Hajo,
2018-0
Hello Luca,
Am 01.02.2018 um 09:10 schrieb Hajo Locke:
Hello Luca,
Am 01.02.2018 um 04:46 schrieb Luca Toscano:
Hi Hajo,
2018-01-31 1:27 GMT-08:00 Hajo Locke <mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>>:
Hello List,
currently i compare features and behaviour of proxy_fcgi to
classica
Hello Luca,
Am 01.02.2018 um 04:46 schrieb Luca Toscano:
Hi Hajo,
2018-01-31 1:27 GMT-08:00 Hajo Locke <mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>>:
Hello List,
currently i compare features and behaviour of proxy_fcgi to
classical methods like mod_fastcgi/mod_php.
mod_php/fas
Hello,
Am 22.01.2018 um 11:54 schrieb Hajo Locke:
Hello,
Am 19.01.2018 um 15:48 schrieb Luca Toscano:
Hi Hajo,
2018-01-19 13:23 GMT+01:00 Hajo Locke <mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>>:
Hello,
thanks Daniel and Stefan. This is a good point.
I did the test with a static file
Hello List,
Am 29.01.2018 um 11:32 schrieb Hajo Locke:
Hello List,
i try to remove mod_php and switch to php-cgi with proxy_fcgi and
mpm_event.
An example setup is running well. But by removing libphp7.so i want
to keep support for php_value/php_flag directives in .htaccess
This is done by
Hello List,
currently i compare features and behaviour of proxy_fcgi to classical
methods like mod_fastcgi/mod_php.
mod_php/fastcgi have options to send every output from backend
immediately to client. So it is possible to see progressing output in
browser and not complete websiteoutput at o
Hello List,
i try to remove mod_php and switch to php-cgi with proxy_fcgi and mpm_event.
An example setup is running well. But by removing libphp7.so i want to
keep support for php_value/php_flag directives in .htaccess
This is done by php-htscanner extension. But for a working php-htscanner
Am 22.01.2018 um 14:38 schrieb Eric Covener:
but i never expected that my winner in this test is mod_php. also there was
lowest
loadavg.
I don't think the motivations to pull the PHP interpreter out of the
webserver process is performance -- that's one of the costs.
yes. my statement was made
Hello List,
separatly from other mail with proxy_fcgi/enablereuse problem i want to
tell about my results. This is quite interesting.
System is Ubuntu16.04, libnghttp2-14 1.7.1, Apache 2.4.29, php 7.0.25
All tests were startet with this params: h2load -n10 -c100 -m10
https://example.com/
Hello,
Am 19.01.2018 um 15:48 schrieb Luca Toscano:
Hi Hajo,
2018-01-19 13:23 GMT+01:00 Hajo Locke <mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>>:
Hello,
thanks Daniel and Stefan. This is a good point.
I did the test with a static file and this test was successfully
done within o
01.2018 um 12:45 schrieb Daniel:
which are the results exactly and which are the results to a non-php
file such as a gif or similar?
2018-01-19 12:38 GMT+01:00 Hajo Locke :
Hello list,
i do some http/2 benchmarks on my machine and have problems to finish at
least one test.
System is U
Hello list,
i do some http/2 benchmarks on my machine and have problems to finish at
least one test.
System is Ubuntu16.04, libnghttp2-14 1.7.1, Apache 2.4.29, mpm_event
I start h2load with standard-params:
h2load -n10 -c100 -m10 https://example.com/phpinfo.php
first steps are really q
Hello,
Am 09.10.2017 um 12:33 schrieb Hajo Locke:
Hello List,
found today an abnormality in my apachestatus for some servers.
There are a lot of "h2 idle, streams" in apachestatus. This looks
like this:
14-0 28241 0/41/41 K 0.25 128 1 0.0 0.10 0.10 ip.ip.ip.ip h2 idle,
stream
Hello List,
found today an abnormality in my apachestatus for some servers.
There are a lot of "h2 idle, streams" in apachestatus. This looks like
this:
14-0 28241 0/41/41 K 0.25 128 1 0.0 0.10 0.10 ip.ip.ip.ip h2 idle,
streams: 0/0/0/0/0 (open/recv/resp/push/rst)
15-0 28242 0/11/11 K 0.2
Hello,
Am 11.09.2017 um 14:58 schrieb Eric Covener:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:28 AM, Hajo Locke wrote:
Hello List,
currently i use classic mod_fastcgi (fastcgiexternalserver) with php-fpm,
which is quite reliable.
A disadvantage of this setup is, that not every response-header set by
Hello List,
currently i use classic mod_fastcgi (fastcgiexternalserver) with
php-fpm, which is quite reliable.
A disadvantage of this setup is, that not every response-header set by
.htaccess will really send to client.
Something like this is the current setup:
AddHandler myphp-cgi .php
Hello,
Am 11.07.2017 um 16:08 schrieb David Copeland:
On 11/07/17 09:58 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:41 AM, David Copeland
wrote:
o HTTP/2 will not be negotiated when using the Prefork MPM
I'm wondering what the reason for this is?
In the previous release, HTTP2 made pr
Hello,
Am 11.07.2017 um 15:58 schrieb Eric Covener:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:41 AM, David Copeland
wrote:
o HTTP/2 will not be negotiated when using the Prefork MPM
I'm wondering what the reason for this is?
In the previous release, HTTP2 made prefork run multi-threaded. People
often chose
ersion
which is officially released.
Thanks,
Hajo
Am 23.05.2017 um 11:36 schrieb Luca Toscano:
Hi Hajo,
any chance that you could download/build/test the latest release of
https://github.com/icing/mod_h2/releases ?
Luca
2017-05-23 11:30 GMT+02:00 Hajo Locke <mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>&g
.05.2017 um 09:22 schrieb Hajo Locke:
Apache 2.4.25
Hello,
i have a small .htaccess with following content to view Foldercontents:
###
Options +Indexes
Headername /foo/bar.htm
###
This is working by http, but fails in https if browser uses http/2.
Chrome Message: ERR_SPDY_PROTOCOL_ERROR
Firefox:
Apache 2.4.25
Hello,
i have a small .htaccess with following content to view Foldercontents:
###
Options +Indexes
Headername /foo/bar.htm
###
This is working by http, but fails in https if browser uses http/2.
Chrome Message: ERR_SPDY_PROTOCOL_ERROR
Firefox: Secure Connection Failed
I dont see
Hello,
found an interesting difference between include behaviour of apache 2.2
and 2.4
Have an include in apache2.conf:
Include /etc/apache2/conf.d/
When editing a conf file in this folder by vi, vi creates a new swp file.
lets say i edit a file logging.conf, so vi creates a file .logging.co
Apache 2.4.25
Hello,
have an issue with http/2 and response "421 Misdirected Request".
I read this to inform about issues with multiple hosts and same
certificate. https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_http2.html
Unfortunately i can't solve my problem on my own.
Involved are to subdomains
Hello,
Am 24.01.2017 um 07:01 schrieb Nick Kew:
On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 21:26 +, Darryl Philip Baker wrote:
DNS doesn’t allow underscore in host and domain names so how a URL
with an underscore would have ever worked is beyond me.
Yeah, but is it the webserver's role to enforce that?
Old an
Hello list,
i have some subdomains with unallowed characters, in my case the underscore.
In apache 2.2 subdomains like this worked: sub_domain.domain.com
In apache 2.4 this produces a 400 servererror (bad request)
It seems that apache 2.4's handling of allowed/not allowed chars is more
strict.
Hello,
Am 02.01.2017 um 12:47 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
Hi Hajo,
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Hajo Locke wrote:
sorry guys. i think i have lost overview. Has this resulted in a public
Hello list,
sorry guys. i think i have lost overview. Has this resulted in a public
patch?
Thanks,
Hajo
Am 23.12.2016 um 13:18 schrieb Konstantin Kolinko:
BCC: Steffen
I did quick tests to verify whether shutdown issues are related to
mod_proxy. They are not related.
2016-12-23 15:01 GMT+
36 GMT+02:00 Hajo Locke <mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de>>:
Hello List,
in apache 2.2 we had a typical vhost like this to realize
wildcardsubdomains:
ServerName *.example.com <http://example.com>
ServerAlias *.example.com <http://example.com>
Docu
Hello List,
in apache 2.2 we had a typical vhost like this to realize
wildcardsubdomains:
ServerName *.example.com
ServerAlias *.example.com
DocumentRoot /var/www/wildcardexample/public_html
In apache 2.4 wildcards are not allowed in servername. Is it ok to just
comment out servername and
Am 29.12.2015 um 20:07 schrieb Eric Covener:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Hajo Locke wrote:
In Apache 2.2 we used additional "Servername *", but with 2.4 it is not
allowed to use wildcards with Servername-Directive.
I think it was treated as a literal * in 2.2. It's just
Hello List,
used for years apache 2.2, now trying to upgrade to 2.4 and do some
configtests.
I noticed an unexpected behaviour of default host.
like suggested here, i use a minimal default vhost:
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/vhosts/examples.html
DocumentRoot"/www/default"
In Apache 2.2
Hello,
iam planning to upgrade my apache2.2 to 2.4., i have 2 questions before
where i need your help.
former SPDY Implementation conflicts with non-threadsafe Moduls like
mod_php. To use SPDY it is necessary to use worker-mpm and php-cgi.
Now HTTP/2 is new standard and i would like to know
Hello,
i have a small mod_jk.conf and want to use mod_rewrite also:
JkMount /* ajp13
JkUnmount /test/* ajp13
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule ^/$ /java_app/ [L]
Rewriting by mod_rewrite only works with urls which are unmounted by
JkUnmount. So above Rule is not working because its immediately pass
Hello,
Am 15.09.2014 um 13:51 schrieb Eric Covener:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:30 AM, Hajo Locke wrote:
If i request this file by wget from the same machine, all is looking fine
and readable.
If i request this file from a other machine, then file seems to be
corrupted. response-header and
Hello,
Am 15.09.2014 um 13:51 schrieb Eric Covener:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:30 AM, Hajo Locke wrote:
If i request this file by wget from the same machine, all is looking fine
and readable.
If i request this file from a other machine, then file seems to be
corrupted. response-header and
Hello,
Am 15.09.2014 um 11:57 schrieb Fiedler Roman:
Hi,
Von: Hajo Locke [mailto:hajo.lo...@gmx.de]
Hello,
one of my machines i upgraded tu ubuntu 14.04 32bit.
there is a apache 2.2.27 running on it (non ubuntu-repo).
i have a textfile which is 512byte long, it contains just some chars
Hello,
one of my machines i upgraded tu ubuntu 14.04 32bit.
there is a apache 2.2.27 running on it (non ubuntu-repo).
i have a textfile which is 512byte long, it contains just some chars,
just one long line with a linebreak at the end.
If i request this file by wget from the same machine, all
Hello,
I have the following in the httpd.conf:
Order allow,deny
Deny from all
Satisfy All
<
Don't you have something similar?
i have this:
Order allow,deny
Deny from all
but this is overwritten by the .htaccess of costumer.
i thought .htaccess is always protected by
Hello,
interesting thing here. Ist this a bug or expected?
Apache is 2.2.23
Costumer uses .htaccess which uses some SetEnvIfNoCase Directives to filter
bad bots.
the allow,deny directive is placed within a filesmatch directive.
example:
SetEnvIfNoCase user-agent "hallohallo" bad_bot=1
Order
You could try rewriting utf-8 representation of umlaut [or other
common char people type into the URL directly] into your local
codepage representation.
this works. is not my preferred solution for this but it works for now. i
will fix my ftp-server to store filenames utf8
Thanks,
Hajo
--
Use links that are URL-encoded with the proper bytes so clients don't
have to choose the codepage to request in.
hmm, but when typing url directly in browser in most cases utf8 is used by
browser.
how to solve this?
Thanks,
Hajo
--
Hello List,
i have some files with german umlauts ö ä ü in filename and want to request
them by http.
filename is coded in latin1, in console/ftp etc. all works well and looks
good.
when requesting file ü.txt i see this error in log:
File does not exist: \xc3\xbc.txt
It just works if i recode
hello,
I'm afraid the only way to disable this is to disable mod_status.
I don't know of any other way and I that's why I don't use mod_status.
which module you are using? i cant renounce to view a statuspage of my
server.
Thanks,
Hans
-
Hello List,
ist there any possibility to hide server-status page provided by mod-status
for my users?
every user with .htaccess is able to use sethandler and able to view
complete status.
how to disable this?
Thanks,
Hajo
---
Apache 2.2.14
Hello,
try to linkcheck my domain with http://validator.w3.org/checklink
The linkchecker tells in some cases that my server would answer with 500:
Error: 500 Server closed connection without sending any data back
All i see in Log is no error but successful request to /robots.txt f
Hello,
You could issue a "kill " of your fcgi-wrapper process that handles
your specific vhost (i distinguish mine through the use of different users
via suexec, so i can do a "pkill -u "), apache will spawn a new
process when it recieves the next request. However, note that this is not
grace
I am not very familiar with mod_fcgid, but hat you want is possible with
what I am running:
httpd 2.3.12-dev with mod_proxy_fcgi
PHP 5.3.7-dev with php-fpm
interesting, but not an option for productive systems.
the killing of user-processes, like suggested by Björn, also isnt a nice
solution b
Hello,
is there a possibility to reload a separate fcgid-application (mod_fcgid) if
something has changed?
May be the php.ini for my wrapper-script has changed and i want to reload
this application for vhost without disturbing other apps.
Is this possible? I think a reload of apache stops all f
Hello List,
following situation: i have 1 apache which is connected by mod_jk to
multiple tomcat servers.
Now it seems to get necessary that i also need to balance the
apache-applications.
What is best practice in my case?
I think about nginx in first line which is connected to apache-servers
See https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43218#c5
It will work if you use a different ServerName (even varying the port
would fix it) in the vhost with a different cert.
Regards, Joe
ahh, a bug.
changing port to non-standard would solve this problem but cause others...
i did
Hello,
Krist wrote:
You don't have a NameVirtualHost directive?
What happens if you enter https://ip2.ip2.ip2.ip2 in your browser?
we use
NameVirtualHost *:80
in httpd.conf
I did some tests with setting NameVirtualHost to base-ip of the server
ip0.ip0.ip0.ip0, but nothing changed.
ip1 an
Hello,
Apache 2.2.14
Hello List,
have a question to ssl and two vhosts.
i have 2 ip-based vhosts for enabling ssl for one domain in httpd.conf
Servername example.com
SSLCertificateFile crt1
Servername example.com
SSLCertificateFile crt2
document-root and Serv
Apache 2.2.14
Hello List,
have a question to ssl and two vhosts.
i have 2 ip-based vhosts for enabling ssl for one domain in httpd.conf
Servername example.com
SSLCertificateFile crt1
Servername example.com
SSLCertificateFile crt2
document-root and Servername for the two vhost
Hello,
would like to activate virus scanning and block uploads for my webdav
clients.
Is there a practicable way to do this?
is someone using mod_clamav for apache?
http://software.othello.ch/mod_clamav/
seems to be not very up to date. last version from 2009.
are there other solutions existe
Hello,
http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/ExtendingPrivilegeSeparation
ahh,thanks a lot for your help. now i can go on...
Thanks,
Hajo
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.
Thanks for your help.
>> The obvious answer, of course, is to run httpd ;)
may be i misunderstood something... at first line is apache which redirects
dav-requests coming on special port or alias by reverse-proxy to a backend
which is able to read/write within users folder (doing the dav-stuff i
>> It's not so much a trick.. You reverse-proxy DAV (write) requests to a
>> back-end which is running on an unprivileged port, as an unprivileged
>> user, who has the permission to do writes on the FS.
ahh, sure... but i would need a new backend for every dav user. which software
is recommend f
Hello List,
a question to mod_dav. Some providers offer mod_dav to edit files which are
also editable/writeable by ftp-user?
In most cases ftp-users/apacheuser are different to avoid security problems.
Whats the trick to make this possible without security risk?
could imagine a special user/gro
On 2010-07-27 10:15, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
If I understood your question properly, you're asking that
/htdocs/a.php is one fastcgi app and /htdocs/b.php is another.
If you want it this way, then you will have to add the shebang (#!)
line to all of your scripts before # This config below ensu
PHP in CGI mode consumes lot of memory because, for every request a
PHP interpreter is called up, so your memory is filled with N php
interpreters executing the same PHP code where N is the number of
online users.
There is no way to avoid it except using some different method like
fastcgi/mod_php.
Hello List,
iam looking for most recommendend setup of apache/php for my purposes. I
want to provide dynamical webspace for some users and there moderate volume
pages.
I know apache in combination with mod_php is fastest setup but i want to
avoid mod_php for some reasons.
Could imagine a setup
80 matches
Mail list logo
