Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 on Solaris 10 (libgcc_s.so problems after compiling)

2008-03-06 Thread Greg W. Smith
ote: Greg W. Smith wrote: Lloyd -- thanks for the information. I actually tried the LD_OPTIONS='-L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib' as well with no luck. I got the same output as you noted in your message. If you run a Solaris program with LD_DEBUG set to suitable values, the run

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 on Solaris 10 (libgcc_s.so problems after compiling)

2008-03-05 Thread Greg W. Smith
Lloyd -- thanks for the information. I actually tried the LD_OPTIONS='-L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib' as well with no luck. I got the same output as you noted in your message. Greg Lloyd Parkes wrote: Greg W. Smith wrote: libgcc_s.so.1 => (f

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 on Solaris 10 (libgcc_s.so problems after compiling)

2008-03-05 Thread Greg W. Smith
All -- I know there have been some messages in the past, however I have not run into this problem until I upgraded from Solaris 2.9 to Solaris 2.10. Everything seems to compile correctly however upon closer inspection libgcc_s.so.1 is not found at runtime. I am currently using gcc version 3.