Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod Disk Cache Problem

2008-02-07 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 04:30:38PM -0600, Campbell, Lance wrote: > I am using mod disk cache to cache some dynamic content. It works great > if there are NO parameters passed to the requested URL. anything with a query string is considered uncacheable unless the thing handling the query sets an e

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authentication Module

2008-01-25 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 11:09:37AM -0600, Campbell, Lance wrote: > I have seen this type of approach used at a few large companies where > authentication needs to be handled only through one central > service/department. Then other departments can develop web > sites/applications without having to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RSS of Apache Processes

2008-01-10 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 08:18:54PM -0600, Graham Frank wrote: > We actually have the MaxRequestsPerChild set to 1000 and KeepAlive off. That means the leak is more than 100KB per request on average, although it could be one very bad leak :/ > Know of any way that we could find the leak considerin

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RSS of Apache Processes

2008-01-10 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 07:36:19PM -0600, Graham Frank wrote: > Can anyone offer up an explanation for this? Thanks. Everything you describe is incredibly normal behaviour associated with a memory leak :-) You can also set a maximum number of requests per child to alleviate the problem. Of cours

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting 5000 concurrent connections and 400 requests per second with Apache

2007-07-26 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 08:48:40PM +0200, Torsten Foertsch wrote: > Please forgive me the stupid question but I thought a port number is a 16 bit > integer. How can one get more than 64k connections to one IP address then? There's no port exhaustion involved, TCP stacks distinguish between socket

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.23 with IPV6

2007-04-25 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:30:19PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 04:42:38AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >> Dunno if anyone else has built httpd/apr for IPv6 as a binary, > >> I haven't (n

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.23 with IPV6

2007-04-25 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:04:09PM +0200, Johnny Kewl wrote: > Is there a site with win32 IPv6 builds of Apache?? Not that I'm aware of, I've definitely never uploaded my builds, but build instructions are at; http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/platform/win_compiling.html Last time I tested

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.23 with IPV6

2007-04-25 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 06:23:27AM -0500, Jess Holle wrote: > My group will need to build such a binary in the not *too* distant > future (e.g. yet this calendar year for sure). Eh, just build it yourself then :-) -- Colm MacCárthaighPublic Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.23 with IPV6

2007-04-25 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 04:42:38AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Dunno if anyone else has built httpd/apr for IPv6 as a binary, > I haven't (not for distribution, in any case). I've been building httpd/apr with IPv6 on windows for years, including the latest versions of both, and they work

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can 32-bit Apache binary run on 64-bit Linux RedHat OS?

2006-07-05 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 03:46:00PM -0700, Qingshan Xie wrote: > Our Linux will be upgraded to 64-bit OS but the > current Apache binary was compiled in 32-bit. Can > 32-bit Apache binary run on 64-bit Linux OS without > any issue? That depends on the 32-bit architecture you're moving from and t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mpm on php

2006-06-21 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 12:14:53PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Of course some of us have been using it for those 6 years in worker mode, > but I wouldn't expect that caviat emptor to disappear anytime soon. The > more things change... I wonder will they ever point out the same thing exis

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Intel platform with EM64T - how?

2006-05-09 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 03:11:34PM +0200, Linuks pytania wrote: > I want ask you: will Apache 2.2 work with 64bit extensions as Intel > Xeon EM64T offerings? Yes, though only if you're running a 64-bit kernel and have the 64-bit build environment, which in the Debian/Ubuntu case means installing

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on Intel platform with EM64T - how?

2006-05-09 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 01:30:40PM +0200, Linuks pytania wrote: > We want use Debian Linux 3.1r2 and Apache 2.2 from source. The > machine (server) is Intel 2400 with 2 Xeon dual-core with HT and > EM64T. > > Will Apache work on this? Yes > How to reach the maxiumum performance? That very mu

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released

2006-05-02 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:41:25PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > More to the point, anyone else could provide binaries if they so > wished (within the project - Apache doesn't accept external binary > contributions). Nobody in the project raised their hand, probably for > similar reasons.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.0.58 Signing key changed?

2006-05-01 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 04:49:15PM -0400, B H wrote: > The public key for Colm MacCarthaigh is in the current KEYS file, but was > not availaible in the version I last downloaded - Can anyone (officially) > confirm that Colm MacCarthaigh is now signing the 2.0.x releases? I officiall

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to hide http service?

2005-12-09 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 10:54:06AM +0800, w01F wrote: > I want my Apache server to refuse all connections except localhost , > and make http service invisible to other machine in case to be hacked. > > Can anyon help me ? Thanks in advance! If you configure Apache to only Listen on 127.0.0.1 or

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compile httpd-2.2.0 on FreeBSD 6

2005-12-06 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 06:19:28PM -0500, Joe Apache wrote: > server/.libs/libmain.a(exports.o)(.data+0xae0): undefined reference to > `apr_memcache_stats' Where did you get your version of apr from? The bundled version doesn't include apr_memcache. -- Colm MacCárthaighPu

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache IPv6 config help please

2005-10-24 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 11:17:57AM +0400, Haifa Murad Hasan Abdulla Al Balooshi wrote: > I want to enable IPv6 > > In the config/httpd file, I added > listen [::1] This is close, but not quite there. You need to specify a port aswell; Listen [::1]:80 Will ask Apache to listen, on po

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_cache and conditional disabling

2005-08-25 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 01:56:07PM +0200, Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote: > OK What about this, at the expense of an additional GET : > > >RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE} MYCOOKIE >RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://cache.foo.bar$1 [P] > >ProxyPassReverse / http://cache.foo.bar/ > >ProxyPass

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_cache and conditional disabling

2005-08-25 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:30:19AM +0200, Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote: > It is possible by doing a bit of rewriting and tweaking of URLs. > > Here's the general idea: > > RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE}MYCOOKIE > RewriteRule ^(.*)$ /DONTCACHE$1 > > ProxyPass /DONTCACHE http://backend.foo.bar/ >

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_cache and conditional disabling

2005-08-25 Thread Colm MacCarthaigh
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 04:03:53PM +1000, Steve McInerney wrote: > As part of implementing a short term performance improvement, we're > looking at using a caching reverse proxy. > > In essence we need to be able to disable mod_cache on a reverse proxy > configuration for certain classes of users