Typo: RGB.
On Nov 13, 2011 3:45 PM, "Ben Timby" wrote:
>
> This is likely a problem with the color settings in the jpg. Open in a
graphics editor and convert to RBG.
Correction: RGB.
This is likely a problem with the color settings in the jpg. Open in a
graphics editor and convert to RBG.
Svenne,
When troubleshooting issues like this, I often use strace to attach to
the pid of the program in questions. A lot of times seeing what the
process is doing when pegged at 100% CPU will lead you to the
solution.
The nice thing about strace is you can attach to the already running
process a
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Devraj Mukherjee wrote:
> Is it possible to configure Apache to ask a script to perform the
> authentication / authorization but allow Apache to serve the content?
Yes, with mod_wsgi even.
http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/AccessControlMechanisms
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> In a shared HOSTING environment, you're absolutely correct.
> The OPs stated goal had nothing to do with shared hosting, although he
> generalized the request to extend that far.
>
> Perhaps I should have made more plain that I am in no way
I think the one gem in this email is the following:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> On 2011-08-15 12:34, lists.sebast...@abwesend.de wrote:
>> If one puts all these things into one big file, it can become confusing
>> and hard to maintain. It would be easier to keep track
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Jonathan Knight
wrote:
> I'm building a load balancer using apache. We have to support both SSl and
> non-SSL sessions and the problem I'm trying to solve is how to get both
> virtual hosts to share session data so that a when a connection is sent to
> the non-SS
I am working with WebDAV on apache and I have figured out how to use
the Content-Range header to append to a file.
Request 1:
HTTP/1.1 PUT /file
Host: node0
Content-Length: 1
a
* /file now: a
Request 2:
HTTP/1.1 PUT /file
Host: node0
Content-Range: 1-4/*
Content-Length: 3
aaa
* /file now: aaa
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Jason Vas Dias
wrote:
> I guess this is just opportunist hosts trying to connect to port 80 / port
> 443 with a garbage protocol ?
> If so, why are log entries made in the access log and not in the error log ?
Jason, this looks like a host connecting to port 443
2011/5/16 孙俊 :
> I think this situation is common
Look into mod_xsendfile. You can do the authentication using PHP, then
instead of sending the file, simply send a header to apache, which
will cause it to send the file on your behalf.
--
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Raino Kolk wrote:
> My problem is how to split original request and send this parallely to two
> different system.
I don't think apache is the right tool for the job. However iptables might be.
http://www.bjou.de/blog/2008/05/howto-copyteeclone-network-traffic-usi
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Appreciate all the input! Those things were already part of my list
> that are mentioned in this email.
>
> What I was trying to point was that we are really in restrictive env
> where server A can't be changed and 3rd party may not agree to
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> thanks! F5 supports the cookies and is recommended way but the problem
> is server A is not managed by us and may be very difficult to
> convience them to enter cookie (changing code). Is it possible to
> embed cookies for non-browser client
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Yes but when we receive request it is not from the end user but other
> host. For eg:
>
> User -> server A (prepares file) -> (http request that need load
> balancing) Our host
>
> So it's server A actually making the request not the user b
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Apache 2:
>
> We use apache 2 and we have 2 data centers. Problem is that both data
> centers are active. So if User uploads a file for eg: in site A that
> User can be directed to site B. Files are kept in sync asynchronously.
> And it could
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Peter Janovsky wrote:
> is anyone using mod_apache_snmp? i notice there hasn't been active
> development since 2006. i'm interested in determining the total number of
> bytes currently served at a given moment? is mod_apache_snmp the way to go,
> if not which di
Nick, this does not sound right to me. Here is why:
If your main HTML was protected by login, the user would be prompted
to authenticate themselves before receiving the HTML. This would keep
the browser from making further requests until authentication
occurred.
It sounds like in your situation,
17 matches
Mail list logo
