Re: [users@httpd] fedora - apache

2013-04-13 Thread Adam Dosch
I believe since around Fedora 15, all network devices take on a new naming convention based (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ConsistentNetworkDeviceNaming). So looking explicitly for ifcfg-eth* in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts would be the case if you're passing kernel boot paramet

Re: [users@httpd] VirtualHost configuration not working as expected with ePages solution

2013-01-10 Thread Adam Dosch
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:15:48 +, Tom Evans wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Tom Frost wrote: Hi Adam Thanks for your reply. Yes, I did c/p and then replace the domains with the placeholders. I too noticed that there wasnt any entry for url1.mydomain.com, and I have been down the

Re: [users@httpd] VirtualHost configuration not working as expected with ePages solution

2013-01-09 Thread Adam Dosch
-t -D DUMP_VHOSTS' and from a web browser. From there once you get it nailed down, then do any merging for maintenance sake on your .conf files. Hope that helps. -A - FROM: Adam Dosch TO: Tom Frost ; users@httpd.apache.org SENT: Thursday, 3 January 2013, 19:2

Re: [users@httpd] VirtualHost configuration not working as expected with ePages solution

2013-01-03 Thread Adam Dosch
Tom, I'd be curious what the output of your 'apachectl -t -D DUMP_VHOSTS' looks like? I've come across this problem as well in a related degree, and interrogating the output of the 'DUMP_VHOSTS' above will at least tell you the top-to-bottom order your vhost requests will travel down in your