Re: [users@httpd] which bit ?

2021-05-17 Thread Joan Touzet
All: I have read back a few weeks in the archives for posts from this individual, "Back button." I do not see any contravention of the code of conduct on the lists by Nick Folino, or other project members. In fact, what I see is Nick asking "Back button" to tone it down, and then because of repea

Re: [users@httpd] which bit ?

2021-05-17 Thread Nick Folino
Bit 5 has always been my favorite bit. He just hangs out there between 6 and 4. Nobody bothers him. Plus you can't get past 15 without him. He's a really good guy. For what you called a horrible product you sure seem to want to figure it out. Keep reading. On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 2:21 PM back b

Re: [users@httpd] Connect to a node instead of a cluster

2021-05-17 Thread vadud3
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 4:29 PM wrote: > > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 2:59 PM Eric Covener wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 2:51 PM wrote: >> >>> I added this but it went to a different node instead of node 1 which is >>> msts1acnf001 >>> >>> ProxyPass /confluencenode1 http://msts1acnf0

Re: [users@httpd] Connect to a node instead of a cluster

2021-05-17 Thread vadud3
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 2:59 PM Eric Covener wrote: > > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 2:51 PM wrote: > >> I added this but it went to a different node instead of node 1 which is >> msts1acnf001 >> >> ProxyPass /confluencenode1 http://msts1acnf001:8098/confluence >> ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode1

Re: [users@httpd] Connect to a node instead of a cluster

2021-05-17 Thread Eric Covener
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 2:51 PM wrote: > I added this but it went to a different node instead of node 1 which is > msts1acnf001 > > ProxyPass /confluencenode1 http://msts1acnf001:8098/confluence > ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode1 http://msts1acnf001:8098/confluence > > Any suggestion what am I d

Re: [users@httpd] Connect to a node instead of a cluster

2021-05-17 Thread vadud3
I added this but it went to a different node instead of node 1 which is msts1acnf001 ProxyPass /confluencenode1 http://msts1acnf001:8098/confluence ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode1 http://msts1acnf001:8098/confluence Any suggestion what am I doing wrong? Thanks, Asif On Mon, May 17, 2021 at

[users@httpd] which bit ?

2021-05-17 Thread back button
  Hi,   In my application  https://www.backbutton.org/   I placed the front end proxy server on the all new  64 Bit Rasperry Pi 4. It is a wopping 64 bit  processor with 8GM Ram  running the on  linux  lsb_release Ubuntu 20.04 LTS.   I used the ubuntu 64 bit OS rather than Raspberry Pi OS b

Re: [users@httpd] Connect to a node instead of a cluster

2021-05-17 Thread Daniel Ferradal
Yes, you need to use a different "source" path for the new directives, destination path can be different but otherwise, how can apache tell when to serve which? El lun., 17 may. 2021 20:08, escribió: > I do have this setup > > ProxyPass /confluence balancer://confluencedc/confluence > ProxyPassR

Re: [users@httpd] Connect to a node instead of a cluster

2021-05-17 Thread vadud3
I do have this setup ProxyPass /confluence balancer://confluencedc/confluence ProxyPassReverse /confluence balancer://confluencedc/confluence To access confluence node it needs to hit /confluence and that is already taken by the above config and maps to the context path. I am not sure if I have

Re: [users@httpd] Connect to a node instead of a cluster

2021-05-17 Thread Daniel Ferradal
Define a ProxyPass directive with a unique path pointing to one of the node you want to use Hint ProyPass /adminpath/ http://server1/admin/ El lun., 17 may. 2021 19:03, escribió: > Hi All, > > I have a load balancer setup like below > > > BalancerMember http://msts1acnf001:8098 route=1 > Bala

[users@httpd] Connect to a node instead of a cluster

2021-05-17 Thread vadud3
Hi All, I have a load balancer setup like below BalancerMember http://msts1acnf001:8098 route=1 BalancerMember http://msts1bcnf002:8098 route=2 BalancerMember http://msts1ccnf003:8098 route=3 ProxySet stickysession=ROUTEID And each node running tomcat and has a context path setup How do I c

Re: [users@httpd] Why so much difference in memory used per process in apache2 between two different systems

2021-05-17 Thread Marc Serra
Thank's Daniel, > The list of modules is different. I don't think you can compare event and prefork servers as if they should behave the same, even more if you have a different list of modules. Consider in prefork each process is a worker, while on event processes are not workers, but threads of

Re: [users@httpd] Why so much difference in memory used per process in apache2 between two different systems

2021-05-17 Thread Marc Serra
Thank's for answer Yann, > MPM prefork is single threaded, while MPM event uses multiple threads, > and each thread "consumes" 8MB of rss (for its stack) on a typical > linux system. > The default thread stack size can be changed with "ulimit -s" (or > LimitSTACK= on systemd), depending on the loa

Re: [users@httpd] Why so much difference in memory used per process in apache2 between two different systems

2021-05-17 Thread Marc Serra
Wow! The memory eater was security2 ... With the module enabled (120-160MB per process) ... # ps axo 'user rss cmd' | grep apache | grep -v "\(root\|grep\|tomcat\)" www-data 121232 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 120596 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 156816 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-

Re: [users@httpd] Why so much difference in memory used per process in apache2 between two different systems

2021-05-17 Thread Daniel Ferradal
The list of modules is different. I don't think you can compare event and prefork servers as if they should behave the same, even more if you have a different list of modules. Consider in prefork each process is a worker, while on event processes are not workers, but threads of each process. In or

Re: [users@httpd] Why so much difference in memory used per process in apache2 between two different systems

2021-05-17 Thread Yann Ylavic
Hi, On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 1:34 PM Marc Serra wrote: > > I have a pair of Ubuntu dedicated servers... > > Server1: > Ubuntu 16.04.7 (64 bits) > 16GB RAM > 8 Xeon CPU > Apache 2.4.18 > MPM mode: prefork > > Server2: > Ubuntu server 20.04.2 (64 bits) > 32GB RAM > 8 Xeon CPU > 2.4.41 > MPM mode: ev

Re: [users@httpd] Why so much difference in memory used per process in apache2 between two different systems

2021-05-17 Thread Dino Ciuffetti
Try to comment out mod_security, it's a module that use enough memory. Also on server2 there are modules not loaded on server1. BTW what's your problem? Your server is plenty of ram and RSS memory is not creating any problem. Right? 17 maggio 2021 13:34, "Marc Serra" mailto:mse...@manxa.com?to=%2

[users@httpd] Why so much difference in memory used per process in apache2 between two different systems

2021-05-17 Thread Marc Serra
Hi to all, I already posted this question to stackoverflow.com but no answer after 9 days: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67439771/why-so-much-difference-in-memory-used-per-process-in-apache2-between-two-differe I hope the apache gurus in this list can help me :) I have a pair of Ubuntu ded