Re: [users@httpd] multiple internal websites

The best choice would be to register a real domain name. Because of the gTLD program, almost anything can now be registered on the internet, so you will keep having issues. You could use .example or .test which shouldn't ever be on the public internet, or you could use .internal which might be reg

[users@httpd] multiple internal websites

Hi, I am quite familiar with hosting multiple domains on a single server using apache virtual hosts. I rent a web server and am running 16 domains (currently) for myself, family and friends. Now I need to host some internal only websites for my employer (employees get free wifi in the cafeteria

Re: [users@httpd] Bypass Authn

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 4:15 PM Eric Covener wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 4:11 PM wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > I am using this config and I am not able to connect to /mydir/noauth > without authentication. > > > > ProxyPass /mydir http://example.org/mydir > > ProxyPassReverse /mydir https:

Re: [users@httpd] Bypass Authn

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 4:11 PM wrote: > > Hi All, > > I am using this config and I am not able to connect to /mydir/noauth without > authentication. > > ProxyPass /mydir http://example.org/mydir > ProxyPassReverse /mydir https://example.org/mydir > > >Require all granted > > > >

[users@httpd] Bypass Authn

Hi All, I am using this config and I am not able to connect to /mydir/noauth without authentication. ProxyPass /mydir http://example.org/mydir ProxyPassReverse /mydir https://example.org/mydir Require all granted Order allow,deny Allow from all AuthType Shibboleth

Re: [users@httpd] Is Apache 2.4.46 is backward compatible with 2.4.6 ?

Thanks ! From: Jim Jagielski Reply to: "users@httpd.apache.org" Date: Wednesday, 23 September 2020 at 5:20 PM To: "users@httpd.apache.org" Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Is Apache 2.4.46 is backward compatible with 2.4.6 ? Yes it is. On Sep 23, 2020, at 3:15 AM, Kapil Awate mailto:kapil.aw...@f

Re: [users@httpd] HTTP 3 support in apache

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 10:49 PM alchemist vk wrote: > > Hi all, > I would like to know, when we can have HTTP3 support in apache webserver > stack. I know that apache not yet committed an affirmative date for support, > but even if it is tentative also, it's helpful to me. > > Pls share the sa

Re: [users@httpd] Is Apache 2.4.46 is backward compatible with 2.4.6 ?

Yes it is. > On Sep 23, 2020, at 3:15 AM, Kapil Awate > wrote: > > Hi All, > > We are planning to upgrade apache to 2.4.46 from 2.4.6. Is Apache 2.4.46 is > backward compatible with 2.4.6 ? Can anyone help me with this ? > > Thanks, > Kapil > > This email and any attachments thereto may

[users@httpd] Is Apache 2.4.46 is backward compatible with 2.4.6 ?

Hi All, We are planning to upgrade apache to 2.4.46 from 2.4.6. Is Apache 2.4.46 is backward compatible with 2.4.6 ? Can anyone help me with this ? Thanks, Kapil This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and/or privileged material for the sole use of the intende

[users@httpd] Is Apache 2.4.46 is backward compatible with 2.4.6 ?

Hi All, We are planning to upgrade apache to 2.4.46 from 2.4.6. Is Apache 2.4.46 is backward compatible with 2.4.6 ? Can anyone help me with this ? Thanks, Kapil This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and/or privileged material for the sole use of the intende

[users@httpd] Is Apache 2.4.46 is backward compatible with 2.4.6 ?

Hi All, We are planning to upgrade apache to 2.4.46 from 2.4.6. Is Apache 2.4.46 is backward compatible with 2.4.6 ? Can anyone help me with this ? Thanks, Kapil This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and/or privileged material for the sole use of the intende