Re: [users@httpd] Migrate 2.2 -> 2.4 ProxyPass now by passes authentication

2016-03-31 Thread david kerns
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:50 PM, david kerns > wrote: > > Everything under /protected requires authentication correctly, but /trac > > (which should also require authentication) goes right in > > If you proxy /trac, the filesystem path /var/

Re: [users@httpd] Migrate 2.2 -> 2.4 ProxyPass now by passes authentication

2016-03-31 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:50 PM, david kerns wrote: > Everything under /protected requires authentication correctly, but /trac > (which should also require authentication) goes right in If you proxy /trac, the filesystem path /var/www/html/trac is never used, so that section does not apply. Yo

[users@httpd] Migrate 2.2 -> 2.4 ProxyPass now by passes authentication

2016-03-31 Thread david kerns
My server used to require authentication before it would proxy to the back end. Now it passes through to the back end without authenticating. What am I missing? I also found that I needed to move the ProxyPass to conf.d/ssl.conf or it would proxy to the back end even before the permanent redirect

Re: [users@httpd] MPM Worker : Two processes launched with no activity

2016-03-31 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Sylvain Goulmy wrote: > Hi Yann, > > Two children processes. Did you configure ListenCoresBucketsRatio? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mai

Re: [users@httpd] MPM Worker : Two processes launched with no activity

2016-03-31 Thread Daniel
Forgot to mention the two processes correspond to maxsparethreads value, 80, and 50 threads per child that makes two processes El jue., 31 de mar. de 2016 22:13, Daniel escribió: > The setup is quite contradictory. > > One one hand you have serverlimit 50, which refers to child processes, and >

Re: [users@httpd] MPM Worker : Two processes launched with no activity

2016-03-31 Thread Daniel
The setup is quite contradictory. One one hand you have serverlimit 50, which refers to child processes, and threads per child 50, which would total for 2500 threads, on the other hand you have specified a total of 150 maxrequestworkers which refer to the maximum permitted amount of threads and th

Re: [users@httpd] MPM Worker : Two processes launched with no activity

2016-03-31 Thread Sylvain Goulmy
Hi Yann, Two children processes. And on the status page i can see : 1 requests currently being processed, 99 idle workers Regards. Sylvain On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Sylvain Goulmy > wrote: > > > > I'm currently using apache 2.4

Re: [users@httpd] MPM Worker : Two processes launched with no activity

2016-03-31 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Sylvain Goulmy wrote: > > I'm currently using apache 2.4.17 on RHEL with the worker mode configured > this way : > > - ThreadLimit : 200 > - ServerLimit : 50 > - ThreadsPerChild : 50 > - MaxRequestWorkers : 150 > - MinSpareThreads : 10 > - MaxSpareThreads : 80 > -

[users@httpd] MPM Worker : Two processes launched with no activity

2016-03-31 Thread Sylvain Goulmy
Hi all, I'm currently using apache 2.4.17 on RHEL with the worker mode configured this way : - ThreadLimit : 200 - ServerLimit : 50 - ThreadsPerChild : 50 - MaxRequestWorkers : 150 - MinSpareThreads : 10 - MaxSpareThreads : 80 - MaxConnectionsPerChild : 0 - StartServers : 1 With this configurati