On 22-Apr-14 12:14 PM, cpa...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi! http://66.71.163.250/_redirect?zomofos105170
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
'green t
Hi! http://66.71.163.250/_redirect?zomofos105170
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Apache 2.4 is technically better and many commonly use components have been
pulled into the Apache core, which had to be manually compiled before, but
pulling in some modules and changing them for Apache 2.4 broke
compatibility with said external modules, ie. importing mod_proxy_html but
not mod_pr
On 10/04/2014 18:43, Joey J wrote:
Apache 2.4 has had a stable release out for over 2 years but is only
used by 2.5% of active Apache sites. Why is the adoption so low?? The
Apache foundation has been recommending upgrading to 2.4 for some time
and looking at the improvements I see significant
On 10.04.2014 19:43, Joey J wrote:
> Apache 2.4 has had a stable release out for over 2 years but is only
> used by 2.5% of active Apache sites. Why is the adoption so low??
> The Apache foundation has been recommending upgrading to 2.4 for some
> time and looking at the improvements I see signif
