On 12/11/12, Igor Cicimov wrote:
>> Am I right in assuming the FD limits is about 20, or lets say 50 FD's
>> for apache internal,
>> plus 1 each for access/error/suexec logs per virtualhost,
>> TIMES number of daemons, using MPM event which seems to load 5 of them
>>
>
> I would say not right. E
Thank everyone who has answered, I prefer apple, Android has problem in this
situation.
> From: bennett.t...@con-way.com
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 07:46:52 -0800
> Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Android device ID not show on access_log
>
> FYI: On my DroidX, I have found
On 12/11/2012 3:46 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I spent last night pulling my hair out because I was trying to build Apache,
> but I was trying different 'configure' commands with different MPM
> configurations, and it seemed like when I changed the parameters for
> configure, it was us
Hi,
I spent last night pulling my hair out because I was trying to build Apache,
but I was trying different 'configure' commands with different MPM
configurations, and it seemed like when I changed the parameters for configure,
it was using old/previous parameters.
I was doing 'make clean' b
On 12/11/2012 1:12 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Toni Moreno wrote:
>> I would be happy to know another way to upload files for any users on the
>> system through HTTPS.
>
> mod_fcgid doesn't do this for you. If you POST to a fastcgi, read the
> post body in whatev
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Toni Moreno wrote:
> I would be happy to know another way to upload files for any users on the
> system through HTTPS.
mod_fcgid doesn't do this for you. If you POST to a fastcgi, read the
post body in whatever direct way your language provides. Don't try to
fig
On 12/11/2012 1:01 PM, Toni Moreno wrote:
> I would be happy to know another way to upload files for any users on
> the system through HTTPS.
>
> But the question is why mod_fcgid changes apache umask ? is the correct
> way to proceed , a undefined configuration , or a bug?
>
> El 11/12/2012 1
I would be happy to know another way to upload files for any users on the
system through HTTPS.
But the question is why mod_fcgid changes apache umask ? is the correct way
to proceed , a undefined configuration , or a bug?
El 11/12/2012 18:12, "Eric Covener" escribió:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 a
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Toni Moreno wrote:
> Yes !!! I do!!!
>
> The php-cgi executes a php command who does the following.
>
> - changes EUID for the process to a user who belongs to "itsatadm" group
> ( it works fine!)
> - reads uploaded file in /tmp/ and stores it to the $HOME of thi
On 12/11/2012 10:23 AM, Handy, Molly CTR DISA PEO-MA wrote:
> All,
>
>
>
> Hello. Forgive my unfamiliarity with Apache but I have a question
> regarding Apache HTTP Server 2.4.x for Windows. We currently have
> version 2.2.22 running on Windows 2008 R2. I reviewed the download page
> and rele
Yes !!! I do!!!
The php-cgi executes a php command who does the following.
- changes EUID for the process to a user who belongs to "itsatadm" group (
it works fine!)
- reads uploaded file in /tmp/ and stores it to the $HOME of this user.
if mod_fcgid changes umask to 600 instead of 644 I can no
All,
Hello. Forgive my unfamiliarity with Apache but I have a question regarding
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.x for Windows. We currently have version 2.2.22
running on Windows 2008 R2. I reviewed the download page and release
statements concerning the 2.4.3 version but I did not see a release
statem
> I think mod_fcgid is doing UPLOAD (handling file transfer) by itself to
/tmp before process
> "/usr/bin/php-cgi " have been spawned, is because of that your suggested
bypass doesn't work.
What error are you seeing exactly? mod_fcgid creates the temporary file
for large bodies, then sends it to
Hi Igor This is my actual configuration, I'm using as Wrapper de php-cgi.
AddHandler fcgid-script .fcgi
FcgidWrapper /usr/bin/php-cgi .fcgi
FcgidIPCDir /opt/itsat/var/run/fastcgi/fcgidsock
DefaultInitEnv PHPRC"/opt/itsat/etc/"
FcgidConnectTimeout 1
On 11/12/2012 11:05 PM, "Toni Moreno" wrote:
>
> Hi Igor!! Thanks a lot for your answer, but I think is not the correct
one, becaouse as I said before user "itsat" is already running with correct
umask, and apache is running with this umask. The same apache instance is
running mod_php and mod_fcgi
Hi Igor!! Thanks a lot for your answer, but I think is not the correct one,
becaouse as I said before user "itsat" is already running with correct
umask, and apache is running with this umask. The same apache instance is
running mod_php and mod_fcgid. When files are created from mod_php
default pe
On 11/12/2012 10:42 PM, "Igor Cicimov" wrote:
>
>
> On 11/12/2012 9:33 PM, "Toni Moreno" wrote:
> >
> > Hi to all ,and sorry form my poor English.
> >
> > I have a problem when trying upload files and handle it with mod_fcgid.
> >
> > The fact is I'm running apache 2.2.16 on debian and runing it
On 11/12/2012 9:33 PM, "Toni Moreno" wrote:
>
> Hi to all ,and sorry form my poor English.
>
> I have a problem when trying upload files and handle it with mod_fcgid.
>
> The fact is I'm running apache 2.2.16 on debian and runing it as user
"itsat" which have "0022" umask. ( user "itsat" creates f
Ok, thanks a lot.
The world is a complicated place, there is allways more than you thought of.
BR Georg
- Original Message -
From: "John Iliffe"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 2:21 AM
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] probably darn rudimentary but still; what to do
to get public with
Hi to all ,and sorry form my poor English.
I have a problem when trying upload files and handle it with mod_fcgid.
The fact is I'm running apache 2.2.16 on debian and runing it as user
"itsat" which have "0022" umask. ( user "itsat" creates files in 644 mode).
itsat@test:/tmp$ touch foo
itsat@te
20 matches
Mail list logo
