On 5/31/2012 1:40 PM, kharp...@oreillyauto.com wrote:
> I am using AJP exclusively to the balancer-members. Forgive my
> ignorance... but will apache still take action if a "failonstatus" is set
> (for example, to 503) if AJP is the communication medium to the
> balancer-member? I assume apache c
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Roney Duilio Stein
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Please, I appreciate if someone could help me answering some questions:
>
> I'm working on an issue that I sent to the Tomcat users mailing list
> (http://tomcat.markmail.org/search/?q=#query:%20list%3Aorg.apache.tomcat.users
Hello.
Please, I appreciate if someone could help me answering some questions:
I'm working on an issue that I sent to the Tomcat users mailing list
(http://tomcat.markmail.org/search/?q=#query:%20list%3Aorg.apache.tomcat.users+page:5+mid:4w7j4oqnuxwkz67c+state:results).
I have some questions:
1
Hello Daniel,
> There is a failonstatus parameter you can set for each
> balancer member that will have mod_proxy_balancer mark the worker out of
> service if that status code is found
I noticed that parameter and had considered it, but wasn't sure how apache
would know to re-enable it. Thank yo
On 5/31/2012 10:49 AM, kharp...@oreillyauto.com wrote:
> However, if I stop a context (to
> simulate a crashed app) and leave tomcat running, apache seems to consider
> the balancer member alive. Obviously, this results in "unavailable"
> responses from Tomcat to the end user.
Hi, Kyle - with any
On 5/27/2012 6:42 AM, Miguel Gonzalez wrote:
>The version of Plesk we have doesn't support this so maybe there is any
> easy way to do this. I've thought about setting up a different instance of
> the web server or configure a different web server but maybe I'm missing an
> even simplier way
Hello,
I am running Apache 2.4.2 as a reverse proxy server. The backend IIS http
server has a timeout of 120 seconds for the backend connection. I occasionally
see 502 errors because the backend connection is closed by the IIS server and
Apache still tries to use it. So I have added "smax=0
howdy;
I just wanted to thank everyone who
replied to my questions. Looks
like it'll be a while before I can
do a re-install/OS change, but
whichever it is, we'll get there.
Thanks again;
Bill
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-u
Hello,
I have a couple apache http servers (v2.2) proxying requests to a handful
of tomcat servers (6.x) serving applications in individual contexts. I
have a ProxyPass line for each context in my config. I'm utilizing the
proxy balancer and its working well; if I kill "tomcat1", apache will qu
--On 31 May 2012 07:02:57 -0400 Eric Covener wrote:
This fails because does not appear to set
a default when you also have a . The
latter always becomes the default.
This is sensible/expected, the vhosts with a specific match in the
incoming interface are the only candidates.
On 31.05.12 1
--On 31 May 2012 07:02:57 -0400 Eric Covener wrote:
This fails because does not appear to set
a default when you also have a . The
latter always becomes the default.
This is sensible/expected, the vhosts with a specific match in the
incoming interface are the only candidates.
OK. So is t
> This fails because does not appear to set
> a default when you also have a . The
> latter always becomes the default.
This is sensible/expected, the vhosts with a specific match in the
incoming interface are the only candidates.
-
> # Listen on 192.200.0.1, 192.200.0.2, 192.200.0.3
> Listen *:80
> Listen *:1234 # <--- config for this not omitted below
>
> NameVirtualHost 192.200.0.1:80
>
> # <--- *** THIS LINE ***
> ServerName will-not-resolve.example.com:80 # port no included as per docs
> # Default vhost for things that
--On 31 May 2012 08:34:42 +0100 Alex Bligh wrote:
To recap the problem is that accessing http://192.200.0.1/ returns the
default site (the first one), not the specific site (the third).
Suppose I change the line marked '*** THIS LINE ***" so it reads
# <--- *** THIS LINE ***
Will that in
Nevermind, got around the problem.
Thanks anyway, regards,
Duarte
On Monday 28 May 2012 21:13:02 Duarte Silva wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I know this should be imposssible ("sounds" to me like a MITM), but bare
> with me for a second and please tell me if this is in any way possible:
>
> Client (HTTPS
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
Is there anything else I can do, like (e.g.) put the IP address as
a hex constant or something in ? Or disable this rather
annoying feature?
I'd suggest opening a bug report that something weird seems to happen
with the literal IP address in
--On 30 May 2012 15:06:15 -0400 Eric Covener wrote:
Is there anything else I can do, like (e.g.) put the IP address as
a hex constant or something in ? Or disable this rather
annoying feature?
I'd suggest opening a bug report that something weird seems to happen
with the literal IP address
18 matches
Mail list logo
