[users@httpd] ProxyExpressEnable

2012-03-14 Thread Brett @Google
In apache 2.4 i'd like to use the new ProxyExpressEnable on a wildcarded VirtualHost, and put a some more specific VirtualHosts for reverse proxies which have more specific configurations or customizations, not provided by the default ProxyExpress reverse proxy behaviour. But ProxyExpressEnable do

[users@httpd] apache 2.4 virtualhosts

2012-03-14 Thread Brett @Google
Hello, There is an example at : http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/vhosts/name-based.html # This first-listed virtual host is also the default for *:80 ServerName www.example.com ServerAlias example.com *.example.com DocumentRoot /www/domain ServerName other.example.com DocumentRoot /www/otherd

Re: [users@httpd] htaccess

2012-03-14 Thread Nick Edwards
On 3/15/12, Anam Ali Khan wrote: > Yes, Apache access.htaccess only at that point where you inserted > AllowOverride in the directory container. > > It also saves a little disk io load on web server :) > > > -Anam > Thanks for confirming my suspicions - busy day ahead :-> ---

Re: [users@httpd] 2.4.1 crazy logging

2012-03-14 Thread Nick Edwards
On 3/11/12, Lester Caine wrote: > - Original message - >> [Sun Mar 11 08:19:40.020588 2012] [core:notice] [pid 25207:tid >> 3069507888] AH00052: child pid 25295 exit signal Segmentation fault >> (11) >> >> Is that to be worried about? > At last someone reporting segfaults ... > I'm getting

Re: [users@httpd] htaccess

2012-03-14 Thread Anam Ali Khan
Yes, Apache access.htaccess only at that point where you inserted AllowOverride in the directory container. It also saves a little disk io load on web server :) -Anam From: Nick Edwards To: users Sent: Wednesday, 14 March 2012, 11:41 Subject: [users@http

Re: [users@httpd] an unknown filter was not added: GZIP

2012-03-14 Thread Tom Evans
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Brent Clark wrote: > Hi Guys > > I keep seeing this error message > > an unknown filter was not added: GZIP > > Google appears to be unhelpful. > Server version: Apache/2.2.16 (Debian) > > Mod_deflate is on. > > Thanks > Brent > mod_deflate provides the DEFLATE fi

[users@httpd] an unknown filter was not added: GZIP

2012-03-14 Thread Brent Clark
Hi Guys I keep seeing this error message an unknown filter was not added: GZIP Google appears to be unhelpful. Server version: Apache/2.2.16 (Debian) Mod_deflate is on. Thanks Brent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr..

RE: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing

2012-03-14 Thread Igor Cicimov
What is in apache log file, any proxy errors? I would do some extra logging if i was you as given in the below link: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy_balancer.html#stickyness_troubleshooting On Mar 14, 2012 8:28 PM, "Kashif Rahman" wrote: > Yes I have that same in server.xml on bo

RE: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing

2012-03-14 Thread Kashif Rahman
Yes I have that same in server.xml on both tomcats. Thank you, Best Regards, Kashif Rahman From: Igor Cicimov [mailto:icici...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 2:21 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing Does the route par

RE: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing

2012-03-14 Thread Igor Cicimov
Does the route parameters in the apache balancer tomcat1 and tomcat2 match the jvmRoute value in the tomcat connectors? On Mar 12, 2012 9:19 PM, "Kashif Rahman" wrote: > Here what I have used : > > ** ** > > == > > ** ** > > ProxyRequests Off > > > >

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2 can't keep up with apache 1.3

2012-03-14 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 3/13/2012 12:25 PM, Tom Evans wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM, William Taylor > wrote: >> I wouldn't say it's silly, but definitely not the norm and obviously a >> low priority >> for everyone else. > > I would say that forking an entire new process to handle a single > request and t