Re: [users@httpd] enable HTTPD to support multi-layer certificates (ca chain)

2012-03-07 Thread Igor Cicimov
I wonder why would the setting SSLCertificateChainFile even exist if you can get away with option 2? On Mar 8, 2012 6:21 PM, "Durairaj, Srinivasan (NSN - IN/Hyderabad)" < srinivasan.durai...@nsn.com> wrote: > Hi, > I want to enable HTTPD to support multi-layer certificates (ca chain). > I had 2 o

[users@httpd] enable HTTPD to support multi-layer certificates (ca chain)

2012-03-07 Thread Durairaj, Srinivasan (NSN - IN/Hyderabad)
Hi, I want to enable HTTPD to support multi-layer certificates (ca chain). I had 2 options Option 1: We can configure SSLCertificateFile (EE file) and SSLCertificateChainFile (CA Chain) Option 2: We can configure SSLCertificateFile (EE+CA Chain) When we tested we found that Option 1 worked and O

RE: [users@httpd] Load Balancing for REST service

2012-03-07 Thread Brian Lauber
Thanks for the quick response. I think this will work for at least some of the REST clients, but we do have a handful of clients that do not accept cookies. In the worst case, I suppose we'll just need to push an update to these clients so that they become cookie-aware. I was unable to access

Re: [users@httpd] Load Balancing for REST service

2012-03-07 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 3/7/2012 4:47 PM, Brian Lauber wrote: > Howdy. > > We have a REST service that we are attempting to load balance via > mod_proxy_balancer. Unfortunately, we have been unable to figure out how to > maintain the session stickiness across REST service calls. In particular, > our REST service d

[users@httpd] Load Balancing for REST service

2012-03-07 Thread Brian Lauber
Howdy. We have a REST service that we are attempting to load balance via mod_proxy_balancer. Unfortunately, we have been unable to figure out how to maintain the session stickiness across REST service calls. In particular, our REST service does not make use of cookies or URL query parameters,

Re: [users@httpd] Reverse proxy to Websphere

2012-03-07 Thread Tom Evans
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Jorge Andres Osorio wrote: > Hi people: > > I'm having issues with and old Apache 2.0.52 running as a reverse > proxy to a Websphere server. The description of the problem is exactly > the same that someone has with Apache 2.2.x in this URL: > > http://www.tek-tips.

Re: [users@httpd] Reverse proxy to Websphere

2012-03-07 Thread Yehuda Katz
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Jorge Andres Osorio wrote: > Hi people: > > I'm having issues with and old Apache 2.0.52 running as a reverse > proxy to a Websphere server. The description of the problem is exactly > the same that someone has with Apache 2.2.x in this URL: > > http://www.tek-tips

[users@httpd] Reverse proxy to Websphere

2012-03-07 Thread Jorge Andres Osorio
Hi people: I'm having issues with and old Apache 2.0.52 running as a reverse proxy to a Websphere server. The description of the problem is exactly the same that someone has with Apache 2.2.x in this URL: http://www.tek-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=1577780 Before just trying to upgrade my product

Re: [users@httpd] Question about mod_status

2012-03-07 Thread Tom Evans
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:47 PM, arianna.man...@yahoo.com wrote: > Hi all, > I'm trying to optimize performance of my web server (Debian Squeeze 64bit, > it's a VM virtual machine with 4 GByte RAM and 4 vCpu). > I'm using standard "deb" package and apache-prefork, with php running as > module. > >

[users@httpd] mod_proxy_balancer error state causes

2012-03-07 Thread Mark Watts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 When using mod_proxy_balancer there are several 'events' that will place a given worker into the Err state for "retry=" seconds. These 'events' don't all appear to be explicitly documented in once place. Clearly any HTTP response code matching the l

Re: [users@httpd] mod_lua segfault in httpd-2.4.1

2012-03-07 Thread Tianyin Xu
OK, cool! Thanks a lot! -- Tianyin On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Marco van Tol wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 06:15:11PM -0800, Tianyin Xu wrote: > > Hi, Marco, > > > > I tried to replay the bug you found. But I didn't see any error message. > It > > works pretty well... > > I'm sure that

Re: [users@httpd] mod_lua segfault in httpd-2.4.1

2012-03-07 Thread Marco van Tol
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 06:15:11PM -0800, Tianyin Xu wrote: > Hi, Marco, > > I tried to replay the bug you found. But I didn't see any error message. It > works pretty well... > I'm sure that I followed all the steps listed in your previous email. > > Could you provide more information? > > btw,