Re: [users@httpd] Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache HTTP Server 2.4.1 Released

2012-02-21 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 2/21/2012 8:16 PM, DW wrote: > > Thanks for the info. Windows binaries are still not available so > wondered if these would be ready tomorrow. Nope. Although httpd-2.4 is 'baked', the dependent libraries expat 2.0.2, zlib 1.2.7, openssl 1.0.1 aren't yet released. Once that's done I expect t

[users@httpd] Re: Advice on Apache 2.2.22

2012-02-21 Thread DW
Gadi Katsovich wrote: > Hello all users, > We are currently working with Apache 2.2.16 and are considering the option of > upgrading to Apache 2.2.22. > I was wondering if Apache 2.2.22 is common enough to be verified as a stable > version. > > Has anyone come across any problems with this versi

[users@httpd] Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache HTTP Server 2.4.1 Released

2012-02-21 Thread DW
Thanks for the info. Windows binaries are still not available so wondered if these would be ready tomorrow. Also, do I need to make any changes to my configuration file or can I use the same one as the one currently on 2.2.22. Thanks again. Jim Jagielski wrote: > Apache HTTP

Re: [users@httpd] 1 Public IP Many Servers

2012-02-21 Thread Yehuda Katz
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Chris Arnold wrote: > I just want to revisit this on-list again. Yehuda has help tremendously, > thank you Yehuda. I have the front end server set for proxy(reverse) in the > httpd file: > ProxyPass /ifolder https://192.168.123.4/ifolder > ProxyPassReverse /ifolder

Re: [users@httpd] Apache Configuration Cleanup Help

2012-02-21 Thread Keith Brown
What you're seeing are the standard Debian/Ubuntu configuration files for Apache. The configuration is broken up across several files in an attempt to make administration simpler: /etc/apache2/apache2.conf - main configuration file; usually not necessary to change; pulls in via the Include d

Re: [users@httpd] Apache Configuration Cleanup Help

2012-02-21 Thread Yehuda Katz
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:17 PM, wrote: > I’ve recently inherited the administration duties of my team’s Apache > server. I’m new to Apache, but I’ve been picking up as much as I can > through tutorials and Google, and from what I can tell the original setup > of our server is messy. Someone dec

[users@httpd] Apache Configuration Cleanup Help

2012-02-21 Thread brittany.m.pearsall
I've recently inherited the administration duties of my team's Apache server. I'm new to Apache, but I've been picking up as much as I can through tutorials and Google, and from what I can tell the original setup of our server is messy. Someone decided it was a good idea to configure the server

Re: [users@httpd] Reverse proxy problem

2012-02-21 Thread Andres Aguado
Well, after looking for, copying/pasting, testing, changing and looking for again, it seems that my problem was that i needed to add the following line into my virtual host:443 SSLProxyEngine on Now it's working Thanks all for your responses, your help and your patient Regards, Andres 2012/2/2

[users@httpd] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache HTTP Server 2.4.1 Released

2012-02-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.1 Released The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are pleased to announce the GA release of version 2.4.1 of the Apache HTTP Server. This version of Apache HTTP Server is the first GA release of the new 2.4.x branch. Apache HTTP Se

[users@httpd] Re: Problem with running CGI script (testeSecurity.cgi.en_US)

2012-02-21 Thread Petr Hracek
Could you please help me someone with that issue? Best regards Petr Dne 15. února 2012 14:16 Petr Hracek napsal(a): > Dear users, > > on my apache2 server (2.2.21) I have problem with running CGI script. > > On that server are "installed" multilanguage pages like each page contains: > index.shtm

Re: [users@httpd] Advice on Apache 2.2.22

2012-02-21 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 2/21/2012 2:08 AM, Gadi Katsovich wrote: > Hello all users, > > We are currently working with Apache 2.2.16 and are considering the option of > upgrading to > Apache 2.2.22. > > I was wondering if Apache 2.2.22 is common enough to be verified as a stable > version. > > Has anyone come acros

Re: [users@httpd] Advice on Apache 2.2.22

2012-02-21 Thread Mathijs
Hi Gadi, 2.2.22 is the current stable release and recommended version for production servers. Previous versions can be vulnerable to known security issues and are missing various bugfixes. On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Gadi Katsovich wrote: > Hello all users, > > We are currently working

[users@httpd] Advice on Apache 2.2.22

2012-02-21 Thread Gadi Katsovich
Hello all users, We are currently working with Apache 2.2.16 and are considering the option of upgrading to Apache 2.2.22. I was wondering if Apache 2.2.22 is common enough to be verified as a stable version. Has anyone come across any problems with this version? Thank you, Gadi K