On 22.11.2011 17:08, Igor Galić wrote:
- Original Message -
[snipp]
> Will a back port for 2.2.x be available?
Doesn't look like anybody has raised that particular issue yet:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
I'll propose it for 2.2.x
meh. This lo
I am getting client certificate errors in the Apache error log:
%%
[Tue Nov 22 10:06:49 2011] [error] [client 192.168.145.120] Re-negotiation
handshake failed: Not accepted by client!?
[Tue Nov 22 10:06:49 2011] [error] [client 192.168.1
- Original Message -
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On 22.11.2011 16:27, Igor Galić wrote:
> > > - Original Message -
> > >> On 22.11.2011 12:19, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> > >> > Dear List members,
> > >> >
> > >> > Setup:
> > >> >
> > >> > Apache 2.2.20
> > >
> > > First
- Original Message -
> On 22.11.2011 16:27, Igor Galić wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> On 22.11.2011 12:19, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> >> > Dear List members,
> >> >
> >> > Setup:
> >> >
> >> > Apache 2.2.20
> >
> > First off, 2.2.21 fixes CVE-2011-3192 - might want to check t
On 22.11.2011 16:27, Igor Galić wrote:
- Original Message -
On 22.11.2011 12:19, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Dear List members,
>
> Setup:
>
> Apache 2.2.20
First off, 2.2.21 fixes CVE-2011-3192 - might want to check that.
Yep, we are on the way :-) to update
http://svn.apache.org/r
On November 22, 2011 10:27 , Igor =?utf-8?Q?Gali=C4=87?=
wrote:
Could this be the reason why the ErrorDocument& ProxyErrorOverride
does not work with ajp?
I'm not entirely sure, but I believe to have seen this fixed in 2.4/trunk.
Yes, it's available starting in 2.3.12:
https://issues.apach
- Original Message -
> On 22.11.2011 12:19, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> > Dear List members,
> >
> > Setup:
> >
> > Apache 2.2.20
First off, 2.2.21 fixes CVE-2011-3192 - might want to check that.
> > Tomcat 6.0.32
> >
> > global config
> >
> > ###
> > ...
> > ProxyErrorOverride On
> > Err
On 22.11.2011 12:19, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Dear List members,
Setup:
Apache 2.2.20
Tomcat 6.0.32
global config
###
...
ProxyErrorOverride On
ErrorDocument 500 /500.html
ErrorDocument 404 /404.html
...
###
[snipp]
Question:
When the tomcat returns a 404 or 500 the httpd shows the tomcat
- Original Message -
> Hello,
> I'm a situation where I can can control the webserver configuration,
> but
> users are free to use .htaccess, and so also write wrong/unsupported
> options in there (f.e. php_flag when we launch PHP via CGI).
>
> I'd like to simply skip those errors and go
Hello,
I'm a situation where I can can control the webserver configuration, but
users are free to use .htaccess, and so also write wrong/unsupported
options in there (f.e. php_flag when we launch PHP via CGI).
I'd like to simply skip those errors and go on with the other (valid)
options inste
On 22 Nov 2011, at 13:00, Tom Evans wrote:
> Nick, does mod_proxy_html set/alter xmlSubstituteEntitiesDefaultValue
> (from ? I think this controls the behaviour on
> parsing a document.
No it doesn't. Not sure if that option existed when I first wrote it:
if it did then I missed it.
I guess i
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> On 22 Nov 2011, at 12:36,
> wrote:
>
>> Hello to all,
>>
>> I set up a reverse proxy with module mod_proxy_html enabled.
>> Now all html entities will be rewritten, for example: ü to ü
>>
>> Can I prevent this rewriting?
>
> Probably not. C
On 22 Nov 2011, at 12:36,
wrote:
> Hello to all,
>
> I set up a reverse proxy with module mod_proxy_html enabled.
> Now all html entities will be rewritten, for example: ü to ü
>
> Can I prevent this rewriting?
Probably not. Can you do it with libxml2?
(it's a long time since I looked at
Hello to all,
I set up a reverse proxy with module mod_proxy_html enabled.
Now all html entities will be rewritten, for example: ü to ü
Can I prevent this rewriting?
Regards Christian
Folks, I finally did it.
I realized mod_proxy_http was not enabled. After enabling it, it worked !!
Thanks to all !
ricardo
2011/11/19 Alex Samad - Yieldbroker
> Hi
>
> ** **
>
> Sorry the last line should have read
>
> ** **
>
> http://reverseproxy:8080/somepage.cgi?somearguments
Dear List members,
Setup:
Apache 2.2.20
Tomcat 6.0.32
global config
###
...
ProxyErrorOverride On
ErrorDocument 500 /500.html
ErrorDocument 404 /404.html
...
###
balancer config
###
LoadModule proxy_balancer_module modules/mod_proxy_balancer.so
BalancerMember ajp://Server1:9201 loadfact
We're using disk cache.
We're working under the assumption that cache gives faster performance. The
tests we performed were not conclusive but we often got slightly better results
when we used cache.
Is your suggestion not to use cache at all?
The "leak" I mentioned is not a real leak. When Apa
17 matches
Mail list logo
