On 18 Jan 2011, at 02:24, Uxio Faria wrote:
> Ok, everything is fine with this. But with apache 2.2 i can't do that,
> headers setted with Header directive
> in apache conf, can't be overwrited by php.
Is it now returning two headers, one from the config and the other from your
PHP?
Have you tried mod_expire?
Sent from my phone
On Jan 18, 2011 1:25 PM, "Uxio Faria" wrote:
I have a problem. I have a large set of servers with apache 1.3 and
php. I set the cache-control
header by default on some directories with this form:
Header Set Ca
I have a problem. I have a large set of servers with apache 1.3 and
php. I set the cache-control
header by default on some directories with this form:
Header Set Cache-Control "max-age=200"
All the files below this directory sets the d
Hello,
I have a couple of apps running on Tomcat servers and I would like to use
mod_proxy_balancer for load balancing and failover. My question has to do with
performance. I see that there is a mod_proxy_ajp and mod_proxy_http modules;
are there any performance gains by using ajp vs. http?
Tha
Thanks!
On Jan 17, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
>
> - "Tom Jones" wrote:
>
>> Thank you. So, I have read over the docs and while this does provide
>
> You must've missed the ?auto parameter in your reading then.
>
>> the answers in a strange format, is there any other hacks or c
- "Tom Jones" wrote:
> Thank you. So, I have read over the docs and while this does provide
You must've missed the ?auto parameter in your reading then.
> the answers in a strange format, is there any other hacks or cgi etc
> so that I can use to just show the requests currently being
> pr
On Monday 17 January 2011 16:24, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2011, at 3:31 AM, Jørn wrote:
> If you look at the data itself, you'll see that it's a png image. It
> looks to me as though you have a file upload form that is getting
> submitted by GET rather than POST. This may be a site problem, o
Thank you. So, I have read over the docs and while this does provide the
answers in a strange format, is there any other hacks or cgi etc so that I can
use to just show the requests currently being processed?
Thanks,
tom
On Jan 8, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 08.01.2011 19:30, To
On Jan 14, 2011, at 3:31 AM, Jørn wrote:
Hello,
This may be a bit off-topic but...
During the last months I have noticed this kind of entries in the
apache log
file:
84.48.198.105 - - [09/Jan/2011:12:41:24 +0100]
"GET /dahls/Vin/url(res://C:/Programfiler/Google/Google%20Toolbar/
Componen
On Monday 17 January 2011 11:35, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 17.01.11 11:31, Jørn wrote:
> > Yes, but the probem is that RedirectMatch only check the string to the
> > left of the ?-sign.
> > I must fix this by chaning the scripts.
>
> aha!
> So, in this case, you will have to use mod_rewrit
> On Monday 17 January 2011 11:27, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On 13.01.11 11:07, Jørn wrote:
> > > I got a problem with using RedirectMatch.
> > >
> > > The following RedirectMatch line works well:
> > > RedirectMatch 301 /Foto/Album.*img_([0-9]*)\.
> > > "http://www.dahl-stamnes.net/Foto/r_
On Monday 17 January 2011 11:27, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 13.01.11 11:07, Jørn wrote:
> > I got a problem with using RedirectMatch.
> >
> > The following RedirectMatch line works well:
> > RedirectMatch 301 /Foto/Album.*img_([0-9]*)\.
> > "http://www.dahl-stamnes.net/Foto/r_img.php?img=$1
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Jørn wrote:
> > The following RedirectMatch line works well:
> > RedirectMatch 301 /Foto/Album.*img_([0-9]*)\.
> > "http://www.dahl-stamnes.net/Foto/r_img.php?img=$1";
> >
> > But now I want to add another RedirectMatch:
> >
> > RedirectMatch 301 ^/Foto/show.*al
On 13.01.11 11:07, Jørn wrote:
> I got a problem with using RedirectMatch.
>
> The following RedirectMatch line works well:
> RedirectMatch 301 /Foto/Album.*img_([0-9]*)\.
> "http://www.dahl-stamnes.net/Foto/r_img.php?img=$1";
>
> But now I want to add another RedirectMatch:
>
> RedirectMatch 3
On 1/16/2011 5:09 PM, Γιώργος Κατωποδης wrote:
> That is right. The expected behaviour from the browsers is to look (from
> default) at port 80.
> I finally solved the problem by changing *nginx* configuration to listen to
> port 81 and
> apache stayed on port 80.
Just as a footnote, you can alw
Hi Jeroen, actually I am using the latest versions. It just appears to
you that I am not because of the mod_jk-1.2.31-httpd-2.2.3.so filename.
My httpd is version 2.2.17. And as far as I can see on the Tomcat
Connectors download homepage, the latest version of those is 1.2.3.
But I guess the fact
16 matches
Mail list logo
