[us...@httpd] What is the meaning of "declining to authorise" showing in error_log?

2010-09-10 Thread Chee Yang Chau
Hi, I am using Apache HTTPD 2.2.4 release 4 in Fedora Core 4. I am trying to protect a cgi-bin folder using LDAP authentication from a OpenLDAP directory server. Here is my configuration in httpd.conf: AuthType Basic AuthName "CVSweb" AllowOverride None Options None Order d

Re: [us...@httpd] Upgrade 1.3.12 -> 2.2.16: Reverse Proxy issues [WAS: Jserv issue ???]

2010-09-10 Thread Mike Schleif
On 9/10/2010 3:19 PM, Mike Schleif wrote: > > On 9/10/2010 12:07 PM, Sander Temme wrote: > > > > On Sep 10, 2010, at 5:23 AM, Mike Schleif wrote: > > > >> SSL: move all SSL to the new frontend? No SSL running on legacy web > server? > > > > Absolutely. You'll find that Apache 2.2.16 comes w

Re: [us...@httpd] Securing handler from direct access via URL. *RESOLUTION*

2010-09-10 Thread Daryl Tester
Jefferson Ogata wrote: On 2010-09-09 20:33, Daryl Tester wrote: This works as it should, but a side effect is that Action is exposing http:///cgi-bin/php5 to the outside world (which barfs when accessed directly). Access permissions on the cgi-bin directory appear to get propagated to the re

Re: [us...@httpd] High load apache

2010-09-10 Thread John List
On 09/10/2010 06:09 PM, Paras pradhan wrote: On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:58 PM, John List > wrote: Which processes are using the processors the most? (I suspect your imap server might be more responsible than apache.) John Hicks True . But I am only

[us...@httpd] Http trailers

2010-09-10 Thread Luca, Dan (STP)
Hi All, I'm having Apache web server (latest version - 2.2) connected to a Tomcat (also latest version - 6.0.29) server through the mod_proxy_ajp module. The Tomcat server hosts a spring 3.0 based application. The clients of this application are embedded devices that use HTTP/1.1 protocol and s

Re: [us...@httpd] High load apache

2010-09-10 Thread Paras pradhan
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:58 PM, John List wrote: > Which processes are using the processors the most? (I suspect your imap > server might be more responsible than apache.) > > John Hicks > > True . But I am only hitting the login.php page from ab to benchmark. Thanks Paras. > > > On 09/08/2010

Re: [us...@httpd] High load apache

2010-09-10 Thread John List
Which processes are using the processors the most? (I suspect your imap server might be more responsible than apache.) John Hicks On 09/08/2010 03:42 PM, Paras pradhan wrote: Hi, Looking for recommendations. I need to serve 100-200+ concurrent users to provide php based webmail client (ho

Re: [us...@httpd] Upgrade 1.3.12 -> 2.2.16: Jserv issue ???

2010-09-10 Thread Mike Schleif
On 9/10/2010 12:07 PM, Sander Temme wrote: > > On Sep 10, 2010, at 5:23 AM, Mike Schleif wrote: > >> SSL: move all SSL to the new frontend? No SSL running on legacy web server? > > Absolutely. You'll find that Apache 2.2.16 comes with mod_ssl bundled. Terminate SSL on the currently shipping

Re: [us...@httpd] Upgrade 1.3.12 -> 2.2.16: Jserv issue ???

2010-09-10 Thread Sander Temme
On Sep 10, 2010, at 5:23 AM, Mike Schleif wrote: > SSL: move all SSL to the new frontend? No SSL running on legacy web server? Absolutely. You'll find that Apache 2.2.16 comes with mod_ssl bundled. Terminate SSL on the currently shipping server. Note that the Apache Software Foundation on

Re: [us...@httpd] How to compile mod_proxy_ajp.so and mod_proxy_balancer.so on apache 2.0.59

2010-09-10 Thread Rainer Jung
On 10.09.2010 14:22, Amol Puglia wrote: Hello Team, Please let me know the steps to compile mod_proxy_ajp.so and mod_proxy_balancer.so with apache 2.0.59 Those modules only exist for Apache 2.2.x. You should update from 2.0.59 zu the recent 2.2.x (2.2.16). The update is not a very big issue

Re: [us...@httpd] How to compile mod_proxy_ajp.so and mod_proxy_balancer.so on apache 2.0.59

2010-09-10 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Amol Puglia wrote: >> >> Hello Team, >> >> Please let me know the steps  to compile mod_proxy_ajp.so and >> mod_proxy_balancer.so with apache 2.0.59 >> > > it's probably a dead end, you should move to 2.2. O

Re: [us...@httpd] How to compile mod_proxy_ajp.so and mod_proxy_balancer.so on apache 2.0.59

2010-09-10 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Amol Puglia wrote: > > Hello Team, > > Please let me know the steps  to compile mod_proxy_ajp.so and > mod_proxy_balancer.so with apache 2.0.59 > it's probably a dead end, you should move to 2.2. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com ---

Re: [us...@httpd] Upgrade 1.3.12 -> 2.2.16: Jserv issue ???

2010-09-10 Thread Mike Schleif
On 9/9/2010 11:30 PM, Sander Temme wrote: > > On Sep 9, 2010, at 9:04 PM, Mike Schleif wrote: > >>> Run Apache 2.2.16 in front as reverse proxy, perhaps with mod_security to keep the stuff you don't want out? That would allow you to leave the Oracle stuff untouched. >> >> Wow! Thank you for

[us...@httpd] How to compile mod_proxy_ajp.so and mod_proxy_balancer.so on apache 2.0.59

2010-09-10 Thread Amol Puglia
Hello Team, Please let me know the steps  to compile mod_proxy_ajp.so and mod_proxy_balancer.so with apache 2.0.59 Thanks in advance!!!

Re: [us...@httpd] Report Bug of HTTPS

2010-09-10 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Devel wrote: > Where I can report this bug? > http://httpd.apache.org/bug_report.html - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/user

[us...@httpd] Report Bug of HTTPS

2010-09-10 Thread Devel
Where I can report this bug? http : // www. { domain } .es:443/ Response: Bad Request Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand. Reason: You're speaking plain HTTP to an SSL-enabled server port. Instead use the HTTPS scheme to access this URL, please. But http header