Re: [us...@httpd] issue in debian lenny.

On 03/04/2010 11:40 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:12 AM, J. Bakshi > wrote: > > Hello list, > > Here in debian lenny the rewrite rules are working well. I have > checked > by this .htaccess and successful > >

Re: [us...@httpd] mod_deflate logging issue when not using virtual hosts

Hello everyone, Trying for the 3rd time ! am i in a minority of 1 on this issue? Would appreciate any thoughts at all anyone has Regards -Anand --- On Tue, 2/23/10, Anand Sathe wrote: > From: Anand Sathe > Subject: [us...@httpd] mod_deflate logging issue when not using virtual hosts > To: user

Re: [us...@httpd] issue in debian lenny.

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:12 AM, J. Bakshi wrote: > Hello list, > > Here in debian lenny the rewrite rules are working well. I have checked > by this .htaccess and successful > > > DirectoryIndex index.php > RewriteEngine On > > #RewriteRule ^typo3$ - [L] > #RewriteRule ^typo

[us...@httpd] issue in debian lenny.

Hello list, Here in debian lenny the rewrite rules are working well. I have checked by this .htaccess and successful DirectoryIndex index.php RewriteEngine On #RewriteRule ^typo3$ - [L] #RewriteRule ^typo3/.*$ - [L] RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_

[us...@httpd] Re: Apache not logging remote user for PHP files protected by Shibboleth

I think that this is caused by a bug in the version of PHP we are running. http://bugs.php.net/46005 On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 10:44:36AM -0800, Svend Sorensen wrote: > (I posted this to the shibboleth-users list, but I haven't found a > solution yet.) > > I have a directory protected with Shibbol

[us...@httpd] Apache not logging remote user for PHP files protected by Shibboleth

(I posted this to the shibboleth-users list, but I haven't found a solution yet.) I have a directory protected with Shibboleth on an Apache 2 server. Everything works as expected except the Apache logging. When I request a PHP file, I am forced to log in, but the remote user (%u) shows up as "-" i

Re: [us...@httpd] Reverse proxy with mod_rewrite using RewriteRule [P]

2010/3/3 Daniel López Robles : > Tom Evans escribió: >> >> 2010/3/2 Daniel López Robles : >> >>> >>> Hello: >>> >>> We have two Apaches in a server: >>> >>> Apache 2.2.14, reverse proxy, listening to IP 192.168.24.X >>> Apache 2.2.11, which actually serves the websites, listening to IP >>> 192.168.

Re: [us...@httpd] Reverse proxy with mod_rewrite using RewriteRule [P]

Tom Evans escribió: 2010/3/2 Daniel López Robles : Hello: We have two Apaches in a server: Apache 2.2.14, reverse proxy, listening to IP 192.168.24.X Apache 2.2.11, which actually serves the websites, listening to IP 192.168.24.Y Domain name proxy.mysite.es points to our reverse proxy Apac

Re: [us...@httpd] FIPS 140_2 compliant for mod_proxy?

On 3/3/2010 8:34 AM, Mike Trent wrote: > > Unfortunatley restricting the algorithms to FIPS compliant algorithms in the > apache configs is not good enough to claim FIPS 140-2 compliance. The > openSSL library 'must' be running in FIPS mode. It is a requirement of FIPS > 140-2 that the module doin

[us...@httpd] HTTP-413 error when server recieves a blank POST

Hi, I use httpd server 2.2.4.1 and due to some issue of one of the client application, client sends a blank(with no payload) POST request. In this case httpd wait and times out and returns the HTTP-413 error. HTTP-413 error indicates 'request entity too large'. However in this case this error i

Re: [us...@httpd] which cache is faster ?

Thanks Phil. On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Philip Wigg wrote: > On 3 March 2010 14:12, Sachin Gopal wrote: > > Hi > > On a production machine we want to deploy caching where users would be > > around 300. Which cache is > > faster and why ? Mod_mem_cache or mod_disk_cache. > > There's a good

Re: [us...@httpd] FIPS 140_2 compliant for mod_proxy?

Unfortunatley restricting the algorithms to FIPS compliant algorithms in the apache configs is not good enough to claim FIPS 140-2 compliance. The openSSL library 'must' be running in FIPS mode. It is a requirement of FIPS 140-2 that the module doing the cryptographic functions is a FIPS 'validate

Re: [us...@httpd] FIPS 140_2 compliant for mod_proxy?

On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Mike Trent wrote: > The issue is FIPS 140-2 compliance. As a server, apache runs SSL in FIPS > 140-2 compliance, but does not run SSL in FIPS 140-2 compliance as a client. > As stated in the early post the FIPS 140-2 patch was applied but does not > seem to have an

Re: [us...@httpd] which cache is faster ?

On 3 March 2010 14:12, Sachin Gopal wrote: > Hi > On a production machine we want to deploy caching where users would be > around 300. Which cache is > faster and why ? Mod_mem_cache or mod_disk_cache. There's a good explanation of the advantages and disadvantages of both here:- http://httpd.apa

[us...@httpd] which cache is faster ?

Hi On a production machine we want to deploy caching where users would be around 300. Which cache is faster and why ? Mod_mem_cache or mod_disk_cache. Thanks -- Sachin

Re: [us...@httpd] FIPS 140_2 compliant for mod_proxy?

Thanks for the response. Yes, we are running apache acting as an SSL client. And yes I am saying that apache is running as a proxy that forwards towards an HTTPS server. It does communicate in SSL so there is no issue with the SSL directives in the config. But for your interest here are the pert

Re: [us...@httpd] use mod_rewrite and mod_jk

thanks Nick, JkUnmount works well. On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Nick Tkach wrote: > Yes, you want to look at JkUnmount directive (something like JkUnmount > /images/*).  Just put it before your JkMount statement(s). > > This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the inten

Re: [us...@httpd] Spider Monkey

On 3 March 2010 12:09, Krist van Besien wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:46 PM, antoine wrote: >> Hello, I have a question in spider monkey api for parsing javascript. >> >> Is this the right list to apply ?? If not please tell me where to ask. > > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=spidermonkey+api+mailing+

Re: [us...@httpd] use mod_rewrite and mod_jk

Yes, you want to look at JkUnmount directive (something like JkUnmount /images/*). Just put it before your JkMount statement(s). This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is proprietary to Ahold and/or its subsidia

Re: [us...@httpd] Spider Monkey

On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:46 PM, antoine wrote: > Hello, I have a question in spider monkey api for parsing javascript. > > Is this the right list to apply ?? If not please tell me where to ask. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=spidermonkey+api+mailing+list Krist -- krist.vanbes...@gmail.com kr...@vanb

[us...@httpd] Spider Monkey

Hello, I have a question in spider monkey api for parsing javascript. Is this the right list to apply ?? If not please tell me where to ask. Regards - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. S

Re: [us...@httpd] Number of https virtual hosts support under v2.0.59

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Ruiyuan Jiang wrote: > Thanks for the response, Krist. > The version of openssl that I am using is good 0.98l. The problem is the > Apache since I can't use 2.2.14 because the bug it has. See my another post > about the page does not refresh automatically after us

Re: [us...@httpd] FIPS 140_2 compliant for mod_proxy?

On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Mike Trent wrote: > There is a patch that turns on FIPS mode in mod_ssl (listed in my last post) > We can run apache as a server for HTTPS (SSL) in FIPS mode. However when > communicating over HTTPS (SSL) via mod_proxy - mod_ssl is not running FIPS > mode. This can

[us...@httpd] use mod_rewrite and mod_jk

hi all I have an apache server ( 2.2.9 ) running on debian lenny, and have name virtualhosts support. The following is my config: ServerName www.example.com DocumentRoot /var/www JkMount /* tomcat RewriteEngine On RewriteRule ^/images/ - [L]