It was thus said that the Great Daniel Reinhardt once stated:
>
> ISPs will soon
> >start to provide their customers with routers that support IPv6, so
> >this is in my opinion a wise decision. It's a bit like TV
> >manucfaturers including a DVB-T tuner in their offerings, even though
> >most peop
On Dec 4, 2009, at 20:25 , Frank Z wrote:
is there a way via RewriteRule to force all access to a certain URL
to return with a HTTP 500
e.g. i have a number 3 applications that are or will be obsoleted
and is expected to return a 500 to all callers who try to access it.
so when someone
On 5 Dec 2009, at 01:25, Frank Z wrote:
> is there a way via RewriteRule to force all access to a certain URL to return
> with a HTTP 500
>
> e.g. i have a number 3 applications that are or will be obsoleted and is
> expected to return a 500 to all callers who try to access it.
>
> so when
is there a way via RewriteRule to force all access to a certain URL to return
with a HTTP 500
e.g. i have a number 3 applications that are or will be obsoleted and
is expected to return a 500 to all callers who try to access it.
so when someone tries to access a deprecated URL such as
http:/
Hi,
I am getting following message in the error log of apache. I am using apache
with subversion. Error log message:
[warn] (OS 10038)An operation was attempted on something that is not a
socket. : getsockname failed
Please let me know why do I get this warning? And how to resolve it?
Thanks
Hi, Haroon and Tom
I think I found the problem but I have to wait for backend Oracle DB to make a
change to test.
But it seems nobody answers my question 2.
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Haroon Rafique [mailto:haroon.rafi...@utoronto.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 10:57 AM
To:
On 4-Dec-2009, at 07:47, Jorge Medina wrote:
> What a nasty member of the user list!
Nah, just a bad case of myopia.
--
BUGS: There is no conversion specification for the phase of the
moon." strftime(3) man page
-
The
What a nasty member of the user list!
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Daniel Reinhardt wrote:
>
> ISPs will soon
>
>> start to provide their customers with routers that support IPv6, so
>> this is in my opinion a wise decision. It's a bit like TV
>> manucfaturers including a DVB-T tuner in their
ISPs will soon
start to provide their customers with routers that support IPv6, so
this is in my opinion a wise decision. It's a bit like TV
manucfaturers including a DVB-T tuner in their offerings, even though
most people don't have a need for it, yet.
Krist
And until that day happens, then
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 14:04, Eric Covener wrote:
> On 12/4/09, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
>> I have tried to backslash it
>
> Backslash worked for me in the RedirectMatch test.
>
Well, it does indeed... During my test period, I forgot that I had an
ExpiresDefault set to "access plus 1 month" in th
On 3-Dec-2009, at 22:22, J. Bakshi wrote:
> Options +FollowSymLinks
>
> RewriteEngine On
> RewriteRule ^typo3$ - [L]
> RewriteRule ^typo3/.*$ - [L]
>
> RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
> RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
> RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-l
>
> RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI}
On 12/4/09, Eric Covener wrote:
> On 12/4/09, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
>
> > The problem I have is with the & being systematically understood by
> > the right size of regexes to mean "the whole thing matched by the
> > matching left regex". While this is a common regex idiom in "basic"
> >
On 12/4/09, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
> The problem I have is with the & being systematically understood by
> the right size of regexes to mean "the whole thing matched by the
> matching left regex". While this is a common regex idiom in "basic"
> regexes (sed acts this way for instance), it is
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 14:07, André Warnier wrote:
[...]
> First, I believe that one mistake is to include the trailing question mark
> into the URL which you redirect.
> In http://my.server.com/foo/?var1=val1...
> The "?" is not actually part of the URI. It is a separator between the URI
> and th
Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 09:55, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
Hello everyone,
I've had the request to redirect a particular URI, say /foo or /foo/
to http://some.external.site/?var1=val1&var2=val2&var3=val3. The
Apache server version is 2.0.52 used on RHEL 4.x. I have tested wi
On 12/4/09, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
> I have tried to backslash it
Backslash worked for me in the RedirectMatch test.
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Projec
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 09:55, Francis GALIEGUE wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've had the request to redirect a particular URI, say /foo or /foo/
> to http://some.external.site/?var1=val1&var2=val2&var3=val3. The
> Apache server version is 2.0.52 used on RHEL 4.x. I have tested with
> 2.2.3 on RHEL
On 01.12.09 09:53, Jai wrote:
> We are trying to configure apache to accept client certificate when
> accessing the page from client side. Here is the configuration,
I wonder you bring this issue up two weeks after finding out that
SSL re-negotiation is unsecure and should not be used:
http://ma
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Devraj Mukherjee wrote:
> Any ideas if I need to do something special when using ProxyRemote and HTTPS?
I asume that since your revers proxy does some content mangling that
your clients talk plain http to your proxy?
A few thinks to look at:
- Does your Squid pro
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Daniel Reinhardt
wrote:
> Actually it has everything to do with it. IPv6 is useless to me on a small
> HOME LAN of 5 computers. It should be disabled by default, and an allowable
> option by those who wish to use IPv6. It shouldn't be forced down peoples
> throa
* Daniel Reinhardt [2009-12-04 09:31]:
> Its like how Linux/Unix Distribution Creaters forcing IPv6 in a
> kernel when someone may not have a need for it or find it useless.
> They should instead build their distributions with IPv4 enabled by
> default, and include a IPv6 enabled Kernel for those
From: "William A. Rowe Jr."
Sent: 04 December, 2009 8:51
To:
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Building Apache 2.2 without IPv6
But if APR *detected* IPv6 functions, that functionality is enabled. If
your packager dropped you an IPv6 enabled package and an IPv4 kernel, that
is their mistake and you n
Hello everyone,
I've had the request to redirect a particular URI, say /foo or /foo/
to http://some.external.site/?var1=val1&var2=val2&var3=val3. The
Apache server version is 2.0.52 used on RHEL 4.x. I have tested with
2.2.3 on RHEL 5.x and the behaviour below is the same...
This looked quite sim
Daniel Reinhardt wrote:
> From: "William A. Rowe Jr."
> Sent: 04 December, 2009 7:03
> To:
> Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Building Apache 2.2 without IPv6
>
>> Zachary Uram wrote:
>>> Krist I prefer IPv4 addressing. I can remember 128.2.10.12 but I can't
>>> remember some insane IPv6 hexadecimal a
From: "William A. Rowe Jr."
Sent: 04 December, 2009 7:03
To:
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Building Apache 2.2 without IPv6
Zachary Uram wrote:
Krist I prefer IPv4 addressing. I can remember 128.2.10.12 but I can't
remember some insane IPv6 hexadecimal address! lol. And I love my
commands such a
25 matches
Mail list logo
