Also did you try setting the Cache header to no-cache on the apllication
side for the cookies?
2009/10/31 Igor Cicimov
> Read the mode_cache directive on the apache site and you will find your
> answer
>
>
> 2009/10/31 Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there a way to forbid caching coo
Read the mode_cache directive on the apache site and you will find your
answer
2009/10/31 Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to forbid caching cookies from application level (let say
> php
> or mod_perl level) by mod_cache? I know method via apache config but trying
> to find one v
Well I'm basically carrying on a practice that was started by the JRun
web server connector tool that is using IfModule to prevent total
Apache startup failure if for some reason JRun/ColdFusion were to get
misconfigured or uninstalled.
In any case you were exactly right - the web server connector
Seth Stone wrote:
I'm running Apache 2.2.3-31 on RHEL 5.4 and am running into an issue
with using an block inside of a VirtualHost stanza. If my
1. Why are you using ? Unless you're constructing a
distribution whose management tools rely on it, there's absolutely
no reason to use it.
2. W
I'm running Apache 2.2.3-31 on RHEL 5.4 and am running into an issue
with using an block inside of a VirtualHost stanza. If my
VirtualHosts are defined in my main config file
(/etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf) the IfModule test works fine. However, I
prefer to store VirtualHost configuration in
/etc/ht
Martin Gerdes wrote:
Cool. Then I'll cease trying to build a test case for now. That would
probably have cost me another day...
I think I've solved it. Well, I've found and fixed a bug that
your response would be likely to provoke. I hope that fixes it!
http://bahumbug.wordpress.com/2009/10/
Hi,
Is there a way to forbid caching cookies from application level (let say php
or mod_perl level) by mod_cache? I know method via apache config but trying
to find one via application level. Of course I would like the rest (bodies)
to be actually cached but not cookies itself.
mod_cache from
Thanks to all for your help up to now. I have a code question and perhaps Eric
you could help out again. I am looking at the changes between 2.2.8 and 2.2.9.
I have both built and have begun tracking down my issue but perhaps you could
offer a little insight.
In mod_isapi.c, in the "apr_status
Hi all;
I was able to resolve this.
The issue apparently was in the CAstore on the apache server. I'm not sure if
there was a corrupt entry in there, or a duplicate. But something was causing
the issue. I created a fresh CA store with one cert, the one matching the root
of the client cert and al
On Oct 30, 2009, at 12:49 PM, André Warnier wrote:
Glad to have been of help.
One more nitpick however, below, lest you remain partly confused.
Yes, indeed. I was confused by the "Same as the value of the CGI
variable REMOTE_USER." statement in the
HttpServletRequest.getRemoteUser javadoc,
Hi.
Glad to have been of help.
One more nitpick however, below, lest you remain partly confused.
Devin Bougie wrote:
...
With the latest posted configuration,
I am able to see the REMOTE_USER HTTP header from the backend GlassFish
Web Application (using HttpServletRequest.getHeader("REMOTE_USE
Hi André,
Thank you very much for another thorough explanation. This certainly
does help clear up my confusion. With the latest posted
configuration, I am able to see the REMOTE_USER HTTP header from the
backend GlassFish Web Application (using HttpServletRequest.getHeader
("REMOTE_USER"
I moved the mod_jk and the workers to another web-server and it works fine.
Seems the problem does not lie on the mod_jk and workers configuration but
somewhere else.
But where?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/sending-request-to-tomcat-failed-%28unrecoverable%29-...-tp2
I've added the reply_timeout as follow:
worker.worker_portfolio_son1.reply_timeout=0
to the workers but I got the same error.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/sending-request-to-tomcat-failed-%28unrecoverable%29-...-tp26126101p26129436.html
Sent from the Apache HTTP Serve
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Octavian Râsnita wrote:
>> That's a rather odd requirement. Normally the requirement is to be
>> redirected to https _before_ logging in. It is, after all, the login
>> data, that you need to protect.
>>
>
> Isn't OK if the login form uses an action="https://...";
Oops. Wrong list...
--
krist.vanbes...@gmail.com
kr...@vanbesien.org
Bremgarten b. Bern, Switzerland
--
A: It reverses the normal flow of conversation.
Q: What's wrong with top-posting?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What's the biggest scourge on plain text email discussions?
---
For those who don't know who Mordac the Preventer is:
http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2007-11-16/
I'm "SPOC" this week. Single Point Of Contact. That means that all
issues first land on my desk.
One of our Windows Sysadmins (the unfortunate guys looking after our
IP TV infrastructure management
Cool. Then I'll cease trying to build a test case for now. That would
probably have cost me another day...
Small correction of the problem description: I mistakingly wrote that the
login page was served in utf8. This is incorrect: It was correctly
translated to ISO-8859-1 :-). So if you manage to f
Besides, I use httpd 2.0.5
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/sending-request-to-tomcat-failed-%28unrecoverable%29-...-tp26126101p26126296.html
Sent from the Apache HTTP Server - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
I met a problem:
I use the Apache Httpd Web Server as the web-load-balancing. It works as an
interface between the Client-User and the back-end program deployed on
Jboss.
One of the function of the web-application is generating portfolio-report
and this is a PDF file. The problem is, if the user
Igor Cicimov wrote:
"
Which is usually a Bad Idea.
Tomcat knows that it should not serve, e.g., the contents of a WEB-INF
directory.
Apache httpd does not know that.
So unless you proxy *everything* to Tomcat (which would then raise the
question of why you have Apache), Apache will happily
21 matches
Mail list logo
