On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:46 AM, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have compiled and installed apache2.2.11 with mod_security and SSL on
> Solaris 10. All was fine until I moved it to jail I had built in /chroot.
> The error I get is:
>
> [Tue Jun 16 16:19:47 2009] [info] Init: Seeding PRNG with
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Damian
Myerscough wrote:
> Hello Neelesh,
>
> It is possible to use a modules called: mod_evasive this will help
> prevent DOS attacks occurring.
>
> http://www.zdziarski.com/projects/mod_evasive/
>
Hi,
mod_evasive will not work for this... on another thread by N
Hi All,
In apache I want to find the list of process which are accessing the file.
I am using the lsof command with popen system call.
For each process with pid a directory will be created in /proc. In
/proc//fd directory list all the files which are beeing used by the
process.
But in my
Karthik Manimaran wrote:
> ProxyPassReverse too doesn't work when I use regex.
Of course it does.
You just need multiple ProxyPassReverse mappings to correct the
myriad ways that the forward pass had occurred. Setting the back
end server to use canonical server name and URI's sure helps.
Karthik Manimaran wrote:
ProxyPassReverse too doesn't work when I use regex.
I'm not sure it works either, but have you actually tried using your $1
and $2 in the ProxyPassReverse line ?
One never knows..
I'm no great expert here, but I have been re-reading the on-line docs
for Proxyx d
ProxyPassReverse too doesn't work when I use regex.
Thanks,
Karthik.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:12 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> Karthik Manimaran wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We want to serve an unlimited number of subdomains (
>> http://subdomain1.domain.com http://subdomain2.domain.com) from an app
>>
Bill Davidson wrote:
André Warnier wrote:
Did you try commenting that line out ?
Hmm. Commenting it out seems to fix it with IE7. Not sure what will
happen to IE6 though. Now I have to go find our old Win2k box and
see if it will still boot.
You could also examine the User-Agent headers s
Karthik Manimaran wrote:
Hi,
We want to serve an unlimited number of subdomains (
http://subdomain1.domain.com http://subdomain2.domain.com) from an app
server in the following way:
http://localhost:port/somecontext/?param=subdomain1,
http://localhost:port/somecontext/?param=subdomain2 resp.
An
Hi,
We want to serve an unlimited number of subdomains (
http://subdomain1.domain.com http://subdomain2.domain.com) from an app
server in the following way:
http://localhost:port/somecontext/?param=subdomain1,
http://localhost:port/somecontext/?param=subdomain2 resp.
Any ideas on how this can be
André Warnier wrote:
Did you try commenting that line out ?
Hmm. Commenting it out seems to fix it with IE7. Not sure what will
happen to IE6 though. Now I have to go find our old Win2k box and
see if it will still boot.
Doesn't affect Chrome though, which still has the problem. Maybe
I sh
Tom Evans wrote:
>
> It is a bit like an arms race - I guess a solution could be to use a
> dedicated thread for reading in POST bodies.
This is why IIS appears to the author that is invulnerable; IIS does fill
an initial buffer, at least 64k worth. Exhaust that buffer and it should
cripple IIS
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 10:17 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> André Warnier wrote:
> > fredk2 wrote:
> >> Would'nt you think that a (simple) timer for the header could fend off
> >> some
> >> of the effect. Can't we assume that if it takes more than 3 second to
> >> enter
> >> the header we do
Hi!
I got a question about how/where to use environment vars.
Assume a simple namebased VirtualHost that is a reverse proxy:
Listen 127.0.0.1:1234
NameVirtualHost 127.0.0.1:1234
ServerName *.foo.com
ProxyPass / balancer://lb/
André Warnier wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> André Warnier wrote:
>>> fredk2 wrote:
Would'nt you think that a (simple) timer for the header could fend off
some
of the effect. Can't we assume that if it takes more than 3 second to
enter
the header we do not want th
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
André Warnier wrote:
fredk2 wrote:
Would'nt you think that a (simple) timer for the header could fend off
some
of the effect. Can't we assume that if it takes more than 3 second to
enter
the header we do not want that client (i'll have to learn to type
faster in
tel
André Warnier wrote:
> fredk2 wrote:
>> Would'nt you think that a (simple) timer for the header could fend off
>> some
>> of the effect. Can't we assume that if it takes more than 3 second to
>> enter
>> the header we do not want that client (i'll have to learn to type
>> faster in
>> telnet :-).
fredk2 wrote:
Would'nt you think that a (simple) timer for the header could fend off some
of the effect. Can't we assume that if it takes more than 3 second to enter
the header we do not want that client (i'll have to learn to type faster in
telnet :-).
For the headers, I think it might help.
Would'nt you think that a (simple) timer for the header could fend off some
of the effect. Can't we assume that if it takes more than 3 second to enter
the header we do not want that client (i'll have to learn to type faster in
telnet :-).
Thanks - Fred
awarnier wrote:
>
> fredk2 wrote:
>> Hi
Hi
We're running http-2.2.3 with preform MPM and host around 500 sites for many
users. We always do a graceful restart of the server lest some users lose
their session. The server has created a large number of shared memory
segments. We have seen it creating as many as 4030 segments and this numbe
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:01 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> - and the arrival of the first byte of the HTTP request itself
> (the G of GET)
I think there's some magic that makes the request line in its entirety
subject to the Timeout, instead of each read.
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
Thanks for your reply!
The user list is stored in a text file.
Eldad
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Sean Conner wrote:
> It was thus said that the Great Eldad Chai once stated:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using Apache reverse proxy.
> >
> > I want to perform the following and wondering if it is pos
It was thus said that the Great Eldad Chai once stated:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Apache reverse proxy.
>
> I want to perform the following and wondering if it is possible:
>
> 1) Extract a field (Subject Name) from a client certificate sent over
> SSL and compare it to a local list I have
>
>
On Thu 25 Jun 2009, André Warnier wrote:
> > I am using Apache reverse proxy.
> >
> > I want to perform the following and wondering if it is possible:
> >
> > 1) Extract a field (Subject Name) from a client certificate
> > sent over SSL and compare it to a local list I have
> >
> > 2) Add
Eldad Chai wrote:
Hi,
I am using Apache reverse proxy.
I want to perform the following and wondering if it is possible:
1) Extract a field (Subject Name) from a client certificate sent over
SSL and compare it to a local list I have
2) Add parts of the certificate to headers or param
fredk2 wrote:
Hi,
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#timeout says:
The TimeOut directive currently defines the amount of time Apache will wait
for three things
1. The total amount of time it takes to receive a GET request
...
1. seems to be misleading, tests with "Timeout 3" does n
Don Kramer wrote:
Hi,
I'm running Apache 2.2.11, PHP 5.2.9-2, and MySQL Server 5.1
in 32-bit Windows XP Professional in a VM installed inside VMWare Workstation
6.5.2. I've noticed after booting up the VM, often
even through the Apache service is up and running and http://localhost and
http:
26 matches
Mail list logo
