On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:24 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> So in short, this does work, until I get into the murky area of keeping the
> URL consistent in the browser. For example, let's take "www.foo.com". I
> always want visitors to see "www.foo.com" in the browser URL field. If I
> set "UseC
Charles Sprickman wrote:
> Hello all,
> ~snip~
>
>
> So in short, this does work, until I get into the murky area of
> keeping the URL consistent in the browser. For example, let's take
> "www.foo.com". I always want visitors to see "www.foo.com" in the
> browser URL field. If I set "UseCanonica
John,
It seems to have gone through just fine this time. Perhaps gmail got
wonky and thought it was spam (based on the content of your response).
We'll consider it an anomality for now, and cross our fingers.
Frank.
John Hudak wrote:
Here is what I posted earlier
Hello:
Running: ps aux
Frank:
Here is the error message...
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
users@httpd.apache.org
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipien
Here is what I posted earlier
Hello:
Running: ps aux |grep http|grep -v "\(root\|grep\)"|wc -l
Yielded: 0
Looking specifically for 'apache' and running: ps -lax
Resulted in: (a partial list, the relevant processes)
1 0 4956 4917 20 0 2068 244 - S? 0:00
/usr/lib
ok, ty.I'll try to repost my reply and see what happens
-J
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Frank Gingras
wrote:
> John,
>
> I'll see if I can find anything specific about your email address.
>
> Frank
>
> John Hudak wrote:
>
>> I started a thread last night, a person replied, I 'replied al
John,
I'll see if I can find anything specific about your email address.
Frank
John Hudak wrote:
I started a thread last night, a person replied, I 'replied all' and got
a message that my message was interpreted as spam and I would be
blocked...I'll see if this reply gets through.
John
On
I started a thread last night, a person replied, I 'replied all' and got a
message that my message was interpreted as spam and I would be
blocked...I'll see if this reply gets through.
John
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Frank Gingras
wrote:
> John,
>
> You mean you cannot create new threads?
John,
You mean you cannot create new threads?
Frank
John Hudak wrote:
hmmm anyone know why I am being blocked from posting?
Thanks
John
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:33 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net>> wrote:
Tom Evans wrote:
Will no-one kill-list this troub
hmmm anyone know why I am being blocked from posting?
Thanks
John
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:33 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrote:
> Tom Evans wrote:
>
>>
>> Will no-one kill-list this troublesome troll?
>>
>
> Just checked, this has been resolved. Move along folks.
>
>
> --
Tom Evans wrote:
Will no-one kill-list this troublesome troll?
Just checked, this has been resolved. Move along folks.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.or
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hello all,
I've got "port-based" virtual hosting working, but am having some
Does tinkering with UseCanonicalPhysicalPort help?
Unless I'm misreading that part of the doc, I would not want to
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've got "port-based" virtual hosting working, but am having some
Does tinkering with UseCanonicalPhysicalPort help?
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
Hello all,
I've got "port-based" virtual hosting working, but am having some
difficulties with enforcing the creation of proper self-referential URLs.
In short, I'm using a scheme in one place (and hopefully others) where I
have multiple virtual private servers that only have one public IP.
iptables change seems too invasive and also access to root is
required. I'll be nervous running those commands in our installer
scripts.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Anthony J. Biacco
wrote:
> Can't you just install an iptables rule to block connections to 8080?
> And then remove it when you'r
That's what I thought but it doesn't behave that way. I see that it
still try to take in new sessions and sometimes it just hangs (or
becomes defunct process) even if there are no sessions in progress.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Frank Gingras
wrote:
> Mohit,
>
> With a graceful restart, any
Hi,
Enable unique_id_module
Enable header_module
Set the following directive
RequestHeader append UNIQUE_ID %{UNIQUE_ID}e
-Jigar
-Original Message-
From: jisut...@cisco.com [mailto:jisut...@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 1:58 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [us...
Can't you just install an iptables rule to block connections to 8080?
And then remove it when you're done. (assuming you're running unix)
Block: iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 --dport 8080 -j DROP
Pass: iptables -D INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 --dport 8080 -j DROP
-Tony
---
Manag
Mohit,
With a graceful restart, any workers will stay alive until the KeepAlive
timeout is reached, at which point the process will be terminated. If
you want them to die faster, lower the KeepAlive value.
Frank.
Mohit Anchlia wrote:
graceful stop doesn't work ..I've tried multiple times. s
Jorge,
No, the log format cannot be changed for the ErrorLog directive.
Jorge Medina wrote:
I am using Apache 2.2.11
Is it possible to modify the ErrorLog timestamp format ?
Currently, I get something like this:
[Mon Mar 09 16:53:18 2009]
I would like to get the timestamp following IS
graceful stop doesn't work ..I've tried multiple times. sometimes it
leaves a defunct process and other times it just hangs even though all
the existing requests have been processed.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Brian Mearns wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> gra
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Bruce
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 5:11 PM
Subject: testing
Please ignore.
I am using Apache 2.2.11
Is it possible to modify the ErrorLog timestamp format ?
Currently, I get something like this:
[Mon Mar 09 16:53:18 2009]
I would like to get the timestamp following ISO8601 format, something
like -mm-ddTHH:MM:SS
[2009-03-18T16:53:18-0400]
I can get the
Hi,
Sorry for the abstract info
Platform: Windows XP (for now)
Apache: 2.2
Tomcat:4.1.39, 5.0
Connector: ajp13
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 1:38 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] UNIQUE_ID to tomcat
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Jigar Sutaria wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I want to compile single apache module on windows and not the complete httpd
> project how can I do that
The mod_perl project has an APXS for windows.
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
--
Hi All,
I want to compile single apache module on windows and not the complete httpd
project how can I do that
-Jigar
Jigar Sutaria wrote:
Hi All,
I am using apache's mod_unique_id module to generate the unidque id for the
request and I want to pass it to tomcat. Any Idea how to do it
-Jigar
It might be useful if you told us a bit about your environment, such as
which platform, which Apache, which Tomcat
You may be able to do it by rewriting the id into the URL (
http://xyz.example.com/foo.jsp?unique_id=xxx).
Jigar Sutaria
03/09/2009 03:36 PM
Please respond to
users@httpd.apache.org
To
cc
Subject
[us...@httpd] UNIQUE_ID to tomcat
Hi All,
I am using apache's mod_unique_id mod
Hi All,
I am using apache's mod_unique_id module to generate the unidque id for the
request and I want to pass it to tomcat. Any Idea how to do it
-Jigar
rel...@harte-hanks.com wrote:
Unfortunately no. You see FoxPro is an odd beast. It'll allow you to run
a script/program without the extension. So from within FoxPro you can
type "do c:\temp\appname" and it'll look for appname.prg, then
appname.app. So the developers who wrote these apps a
Unfortunately no. You see FoxPro is an odd beast. It'll allow you to run
a script/program without the extension. So from within FoxPro you can
type "do c:\temp\appname" and it'll look for appname.prg, then
appname.app. So the developers who wrote these apps are requesting pages
like /cgi/lo
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:40 PM, wrote:
>
> Hello all, I have an old Windows web system I'm trying to migrate from an
> ancient version of Netscape Enterprise Server to Apache 2.2.x. Most of
> the site is static content and I have that working correctly. However
> part of the site is also using
My outlook uses TOFU
Thanks,
~Todd
-Original Message-
From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:19 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] RE: [dtiSPAM] - Re: [us...@httpd] MOD_PROXY Reverse
Proxy - Email has different SMTP TO: and
Hello all, I have an old Windows web system I'm trying to migrate from an
ancient version of Netscape Enterprise Server to Apache 2.2.x. Most of
the site is static content and I have that working correctly. However
part of the site is also using another ancient technology called FoxWeb
which
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> graceful stop?
>
> --
> Eric Covener
> cove...@gmail.com
>
Dammit, Eric. You beat me by 1 minute.
=J
-Brian
--
Feel free to contact me using PGP Encryption:
Key Id: 0x3AA70848
Available from: http://pgp.mit.edu/
---
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> The problem is that we have F5 before webserver and we want a way to
> remove that web server out of service without having to stop apache
> and affecting existing connections. So only way is to have apache
> listen on socket and F5 do a healt
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> The problem is that we have F5 before webserver and we want a way to
> remove that web server out of service without having to stop apache
> and affecting existing connections. So only way is to have apache
> listen on socket and F5 do a healt
The problem is that we have F5 before webserver and we want a way to
remove that web server out of service without having to stop apache
and affecting existing connections. So only way is to have apache
listen on socket and F5 do a health check. Other way is using http,
which has more overhead.
On
See
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/platform/win_compiling.html
You have to have Microsoft Visual C++/Studio
--
Dan Poirier
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apach
I am using ant cpp task to compile it in following way,
-Original Message-
From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@g
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Jigar Sutaria wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> [cc]
> C:\development\opensource\Apache\httpd-2_0_28\modules\loggers\mod_log_config.c:[I
> am trying to compile this module and getting following errors]
>
> [I just downloaded the source code no modification yet and getting this
>
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 11:35 -0500, Flowering Weeds wrote:
>
>
> > Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Validating HTTP requests
> >
> >
> > Brian Mearns wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry, don't know of anything in particular, but it seems
> > > to me that Apache itself would necessarily be doing some
> > > amount
Hi All,
[cc]
C:\development\opensource\Apache\httpd-2_0_28\modules\loggers\mod_log_config
c:[I am trying to compile this module and getting following errors]
[I just downloaded the source code no modification yet and getting this
error. 2_0_28]
[cc] Error E2141
C:\development\opensource\Apache\h
Mohit Anchlia wrote:
But can I tell apache to stop listening on only one port? So if apache
is listening on 80, 8080 then ask apache to stop listening on 8080
only.
No, not without restarting Apache.
But if you explained why you want to do that, then maybe we can provide
a better answer than j
On 09.03.09 10:12, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> But can I tell apache to stop listening on only one port? So if apache
> is listening on 80, 8080 then ask apache to stop listening on 8080
> only.
The most important question you did not answer (or did I miss it?) was:
WHY?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, u
Only if you when into the config after apache's start, commented out the 8080
Listen line, and reloaded apache.
Then to get it listening on 8080 again, you'd have to do the same, just
uncommenting the Listen line
-Tony
---
Manager, IT Operations
Format Dynamics, Inc.
303-
But can I tell apache to stop listening on only one port? So if apache
is listening on 80, 8080 then ask apache to stop listening on 8080
only.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Frank Gingras
wrote:
> Mohit,
>
> Short answer: no. You must define the Listen directives then start apache.
> If you alt
Mohil,
Please disregard this troll. He has been known to infect every new
thread in this mailing list.
Frank.
Flowering Weeds wrote:
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Validating HTTP requests
Brian Mearns wrote:
Sorry, don't know of anything in particular, but it seems
to me that Apa
> Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Validating HTTP requests
>
>
> Brian Mearns wrote:
>
> > Sorry, don't know of anything in particular, but it seems
> > to me that Apache itself would necessarily be doing some
> > amount of validation on the in coming requests.
>
> Yes of course :-). But 1/ I'd
Mohit Anchlia wrote:
Apache 2:
Is there a way to tell apache to listen on say port 9000 and then when
apache is up ask apache to stop listening on just port 9000? Which
means it will keep listening on port 80 or 443.
Curiosity : why ?
--
Mohit,
Short answer: no. You must define the Listen directives then start
apache. If you alter those, apache must be restarted.
Frank
Mohit Anchlia wrote:
Apache 2:
Is there a way to tell apache to listen on say port 9000 and then when
apache is up ask apache to stop listening on just port
Apache 2:
Is there a way to tell apache to listen on say port 9000 and then when
apache is up ask apache to stop listening on just port 9000? Which
means it will keep listening on port 80 or 443.
-
The official User-To-User suppo
Florent Georges wrote:
Ivars Strazdiņš wrote:
Ivars,
mod_security ?
http://www.modsecurity.org/
Thank you. But if I am right, this allows one to plug its own validation
rules in Apache (or use built-in rules from ModSecurity but those are oriented
to the application scope: inj
Ivars Strazdiņš wrote:
Ivars,
> mod_security ?
> http://www.modsecurity.org/
Thank you. But if I am right, this allows one to plug its own validation
rules in Apache (or use built-in rules from ModSecurity but those are oriented
to the application scope: injection detection, authenticati
Florent Georges wrote:
I am looking for an HTTPD module. I've made a few searches
within the repository but didn't find anything. So just in
case I missed something...
...
mod_security ?
http://www.modsecurity.org/
Ivars
-
Brian Mearns wrote:
> Sorry, don't know of anything in particular, but it seems
> to me that Apache itself would necessarily be doing some
> amount of validation on the in coming requests.
Yes of course :-). But 1/ I'd like the validation to be as strict as
possible (as you said, I expect Ap
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Florent Georges wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for an HTTPD module. I've made a few searches
> within the repository but didn't find anything. So just in
> case I missed something...
>
> I look for a tool to validate HTTP requests. The perfect
> tool would in
Hi,
I am looking for an HTTPD module. I've made a few searches
within the repository but didn't find anything. So just in
case I missed something...
I look for a tool to validate HTTP requests. The perfect
tool would install in the HTTP server and respond to HTTP
requests with a validat
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Arne Berner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Apache/2.2.8 running as a reverse proxy in front of a .Net
> application using Ajax and the gaia framework (gaiaware.net)
> I have setup several ProxyHTMLURLMap for to rewrite the responses from
> the application, and this work
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:39 AM, John Hudak wrote:
> Could someone suggest where the bottle neck might be and how to fix it? Is
> there anyway to monitor the server to see where things are being blocked??
How many apache processes do you start?
Is there anything running on your server that migh
error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _ap_hook_insert_filter
hello, i installed an apache with the package
apache_2.2.11-win32-x86-openssl-0.9.8i.msi
I wrote a module which contains an input filter. when i complie it with
VC++6.0 on winXP,
i got an error "error LNK2001: unresolved external sym
61 matches
Mail list logo
