Hi!
I've been a long time administrator of Apache servers in a University
environment (translation: a LOT of variety in what content & apps are
on the servers), and our configuration isn't getting simpler.
One of our sites is currently set up with a reverse proxy in front of
two back-end sites, of
Krist van Besien wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:56 PM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>
>
>> May be , I'm not sure but I am happy to confirm that I have solved it in
>> a different way. At my web root directory I have created php.ini and
>> placed the configuration as
>>
>> ~~
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 06:32:38PM -0500, Frank Gingras wrote:
> John,
>
> Place your restrictions in your block instead, in your
> vhost.
I did. But without a / In the examples I saw, it looked like
everything starting with a / was an absolute path on the system.
I'll give that a whirl and
John,
Place your restrictions in your block instead, in your
vhost.
Frank.
John Oliver wrote:
Is it possible to apply htaccess restrictions to a relative URL instead
of an absolute file path?
For instance, https://server.host.name/app is handled by an AJP
ProxyPass to Tomcat. I'd like to
Is it possible to apply htaccess restrictions to a relative URL instead
of an absolute file path?
For instance, https://server.host.name/app is handled by an AJP
ProxyPass to Tomcat. I'd like to restrict access to that URL by IP, but
when I add a stanza to httpd.conf, it doesn't work. I'm assumi
John Oliver wrote:
Is it possible for Apache to authenticate users against a database kept
by Drupal / PHP / MySQL?
I'm using proxy_ajp to handle requests for some applications hosted by
Tomcat. The problem with that is, anyone can access them. We'd like to
have any requests for https://server
Is it possible for Apache to authenticate users against a database kept
by Drupal / PHP / MySQL?
I'm using proxy_ajp to handle requests for some applications hosted by
Tomcat. The problem with that is, anyone can access them. We'd like to
have any requests for https://server.host.name/applicatio
Hmm, then the only way I can see doing it then is by putting your
documents not to be cached in some /no-cache web path and using the
CacheDisable directive with that as the argument.
If you don't care much about the Last-Modified header, you can try
unsetting that header that and set CacheIgnoreNo
fredk2 wrote:
Hi,
I kept on testing with the attributes max_packet_size and packetSize (in
worker.properties and server.xml) and it appears to fix the large header
problem.
Does this mean that all the headers together have to fit into a buffer which
size is set by max_packet_size?
You'd be be
This does not seem to work for some reason. I tried putting the override
section above, then below the authenticated section,
but always got the standard 401 page versus the custom register.html page.
It also appeared that maybe the proxy configuration of one location is being
applied to both.
[SOLVED]
Thank you everyone for the ideas!
When I checked the error logs,
Apache was reinserting the base of the .htaccess directory's URI.
So my "/cgi-bin/script" became /~me/public_html/cgi-bin/script (/~me/
public_html/ is the .htaccess directory + /cgi-bin/script, the
directory I specified).
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:57 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This is posted both to the Apache httpd and Tomcat user lists.
>
> I am taking on a project for which, on the customer side, the installed
> HTTP-related software consists of (in the customer's words) "IBM Websphere
> 6.1 and the corr
I know how to use ab to benchmark a particular url, but I think it
would be more useful to use my previous access log to generate the
load, so I can test the performance in a more scientific way...so are
there any tools recommended?
Thanks.
Hi.
This is posted both to the Apache httpd and Tomcat user lists.
I am taking on a project for which, on the customer side, the installed
HTTP-related software consists of (in the customer's words) "IBM
Websphere 6.1 and the corresponding IBM webserver".
Does anyone on this list have any kn
Hi again,
I think that creates a problem that downstream proxies are affected by that
change, meaning that if i remove those headers, squids and browsers will not
cache that content.
I only want that behaviour in mod_cache in my reverse proxy and not in the
other downstream proxies.
Thanks,
N
On Monday 02 March 2009 18:12:59 Eric Covener wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Nuno Fernandes
wrote:
> >> SetEnvIf Request_URI "\.aspx$" no-cache
> >
> > This is in the manual but not yet in a 2.2.x release
>
> Updated the manual
Brian Mearns wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:11 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
Dear list,
I have a very long .htaccess. Because the .htaccess has all the config
to block the web-graber, leaching protection , redirect rules, php.ini
setting etc.
I like to place all the web-graber, leaching protect
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:11 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I have a very long .htaccess. Because the .htaccess has all the config
> to block the web-graber, leaching protection , redirect rules, php.ini
> setting etc.
> I like to place all the web-graber, leaching protection settings in
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Kaushal Shriyan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a step by step guide to configure ssl on apache2 on Gentoo OS?
>
> Thanks and Regards
>
> Kaushal
There are numerous guides to configuring apache2 with ssl. I would
imagine it's largely the same on Gentoo as other Unix vari
Hi,
I kept on testing with the attributes max_packet_size and packetSize (in
worker.properties and server.xml) and it appears to fix the large header
problem.
Does this mean that all the headers together have to fit into a buffer which
size is set by max_packet_size?
Thanks - Fredk
fredk2 wro
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:56 PM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>
> May be , I'm not sure but I am happy to confirm that I have solved it in
> a different way. At my web root directory I have created php.ini and
> placed the configuration as
>
> ~~~
> display_startup_errors = off
>
Eric Covener wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:57 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
>
>
>> ~
>> Invalid command 'php_flag', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module
>> not included in the server configuration
>>
>>
>
> It's a m
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:57 AM, J. Bakshi wrote:
> ~
> Invalid command 'php_flag', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module
> not included in the server configuration
>
It's a mod_php directive. Maybe you're not using mo
Foster, Stephen (ASPIRE) wrote:
But the content type will be sent back by dynamic content so that code
chunk will not be valid.
If so, then why can whatever the "dynamic" portion, which generates the
response, not also add the response header you want ?
That would be the most logical and effi
Hi there,
I have as situation where I need to add custom headers when the response
is of a certain type, for example:
If the response type is "text/html" I want to add a header of
"Content-Style-Type "text/css""
If the response type is anything other that "text/html" then don't add
anythin
25 matches
Mail list logo
